Literature DB >> 23093234

Effect of source of funding on weight loss up to 3 years after gastric banding.

Jonathan Afoke1, Sanjay Agrawal, Janet Edmond, David Mahon, Richard Welbourn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a popular choice for patients seeking weight loss surgery. Since behavioural change appears to play a role in weight loss outcomes we postulated that publicly funded patients might not do as well as self-payers. This series examines the effect of public funding versus self-pay on patients undergoing LAGB over 1, 2 and 3 years.
METHODS: Consecutive non-randomised cohort series of patient undergoing LAGB over 5 years (September 2003 to December 2008) in a single unit. Age, sex, funding route, body mass index (BMI) and complications were recorded. Per cent excess weight loss (EWL) and the Reinhold criterion for success (proportion achieving 50 % EWL) were assessed.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were publicly funded, and 250 patients were self-payers. Initial BMI was significantly higher in publicly funded patients (46.6 vs. 42.3 kg/m(2), p < 0.001) with a higher proportion of males (22.2 vs. 6.0 %, p < 0.001). Mean % EWL was significantly less for publicly funded patients at 1 year (38.1 vs. 53.5 %, p < 0.001) and 2 years (49.6 vs. 64.1 %, p < 0.001), but not at 3 years (59.7 vs. 61.8 %, p = 0.784). Fewer publicly funded patients achieved 50 % EWL at 1 year (24.5 vs. 50.2 %, p < 0.001), but with no significant difference at 2 years (54.8 vs. 67.0 %, p = 0.140) or 3 years (55.2 vs. 66.0 %, p = 0.349).
CONCLUSIONS: Self-pay patients initially achieved more % EWL and greater success in reaching 50 % EWL after LAGB, but this difference was not maintained. The results suggest that patient motivation, using self-pay as a surrogate marker, may affect early results, but the operation itself is the main determinant of weight loss at 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23093234     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2578-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Johnathan A Slone; Xuan-Mai T Nguyen; Jaimee S Hartman; David B Hoyt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity.

Authors:  Thomas A Wadden; Robert I Berkowitz; Leslie G Womble; David B Sarwer; Suzanne Phelan; Robert K Cato; Louise A Hesson; Suzette Y Osei; Rosalind Kaplan; Albert J Stunkard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Bariatric surgery in Canada — bridging the gap.

Authors:  Chris Cobourn
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates.

Authors:  M Suter; J M Calmes; A Paroz; V Giusti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients lost to follow-up.

Authors:  W W te Riele; D Boerma; M J Wiezer; I H M Borel Rinkes; B van Ramshorst
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Does patient compliance with preoperative bariatric office visits affect postoperative excess weight loss?

Authors:  Maher El Chaar; Kathleen McDeavitt; Sarah Richardson; Keith S Gersin; Timothy S Kuwada; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  Positive relationship between support group attendance and one-year postoperative weight loss in gastric banding patients.

Authors:  Kathryn A Kaiser; Susan F Franks; Adam B Smith
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  Introduction of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in England: observational population cohort study.

Authors:  Elaine M Burns; Haris Naseem; Alex Bottle; Antonio Ivan Lazzarino; Paul Aylin; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Omar Faiz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-26

9.  Motivation, readiness to change, and weight loss following adjustable gastric band surgery.

Authors:  John B Dixon; Cheryl P Laurie; Margaret L Anderson; Melissa J Hayden; Maureen E Dixon; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 10.  Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Jane Garb; Garry Welch; Sofija Zagarins; Jay Kuhn; John Romanelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gender influence on long-term weight loss after three bariatric procedures: gastric banding is less effective in males in a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Bekheit; Khaled Katri; Mohamed Hany Ashour; Bruno Sgromo; Galal Abou-ElNagah; Wael Nabil Abdel-Salam; Jean-Marc Catheline; El-Said El Kayal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Initial Weight Loss after Restrictive Bariatric Procedures May Predict Mid-Term Weight Maintenance: Results From a 12-Month Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Marko Nikolić; Ivan Kruljac; Lora Kirigin; Gorana Mirošević; Neven Ljubičić; Borka Pezo Nikolić; Miroslav Bekavac-Bešlin; Ivan Budimir; Milan Vrkljan
Journal:  Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 0.607

Review 3.  Developing Integrated Clinical Pathways for the Management of Clinically Severe Adult Obesity: a Critique of NHS England Policy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Hazlehurst; Jennifer Logue; Helen M Parretti; Sally Abbott; Adrian Brown; Dimitri J Pournaras; Abd A Tahrani
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2020-11-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.