Literature DB >> 21183614

Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an in vivo reproducibility study.

A J Geers1, I Larrabide, A G Radaelli, H Bogunovic, M Kim, H A F Gratama van Andel, C B Majoie, E VanBavel, A F Frangi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Patient-specific simulations of the hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms can be constructed by using image-based vascular models and CFD techniques. This work evaluates the impact of the choice of imaging technique on these simulations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten aneurysms, imaged with 3DRA and CTA, were analyzed to assess the reproducibility of geometric and hemodynamic variables across the 2 modalities.
RESULTS: Compared with 3DRA models, we found that CTA models often had larger aneurysm necks (P = .05) and that most of the smallest vessels (between 0.7 and 1.0 mm in diameter) could not be reconstructed successfully with CTA. With respect to the values measured in the 3DRA models, the flow rate differed by 14.1 ± 2.8% (mean ± SE) just proximal to the aneurysm and 33.9 ± 7.6% at the aneurysm neck. The mean WSS on the aneurysm differed by 44.2 ± 6.0%. Even when normalized to the parent vessel WSS, a difference of 31.4 ± 9.9% remained, with the normalized WSS in most cases being larger in the CTA model (P = .04). Despite these substantial differences, excellent agreement (κ ≥ 0.9) was found for qualitative variables that describe the flow field, such as the structure of the flow pattern and the flow complexity.
CONCLUSIONS: Although relatively large differences were found for all evaluated quantitative hemodynamic variables, the main flow characteristics were reproduced across imaging modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21183614      PMCID: PMC8013098          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  41 in total

1.  Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics.

Authors:  M A Castro; C M Putman; J R Cebral
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Efficient simulation of blood flow past complex endovascular devices using an adaptive embedding technique.

Authors:  Juan R Cebral; Rainald Löhner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Wall shear stress--an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure--in the arterial system in vivo. Discrepancies with theory.

Authors:  Robert S Reneman; Theo Arts; Arnold P G Hoeks
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 1.934

4.  CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Laura Dempere-Marco; Estanislao Oubel; Marcelo Castro; Christopher Putman; Alejandro Frangi; Juan Cebral
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2006

5.  CT angiography, MR angiography and rotational digital subtraction angiography for volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms. An experimental study.

Authors:  M Piotin; P Gailloud; L Bidaut; S Mandai; M Muster; J Moret; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Hemodynamics in a lethal basilar artery aneurysm just before its rupture.

Authors:  J R Cebral; S Hendrickson; C M Putman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases.

Authors:  Juhana Frösen; Anna Piippo; Anders Paetau; Marko Kangasniemi; Mika Niemelä; Juha Hernesniemi; Juha Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  3D rotational digital subtraction angiography may underestimate intracranial aneurysms: findings from two basilar aneurysms.

Authors:  L-D Jou; A Mohamed; D H Lee; M E Mawad
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography.

Authors:  M Romijn; H A F Gratama van Andel; M A van Walderveen; M E Sprengers; J C van Rijn; W J van Rooij; H W Venema; C A Grimbergen; G J den Heeten; C B Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  W J van Rooij; M E Sprengers; A N de Gast; J P P Peluso; M Sluzewski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  19 in total

1.  Point: CFD--computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination.

Authors:  D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Statistical wall shear stress maps of ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms.

Authors:  L Goubergrits; J Schaller; U Kertzscher; N van den Bruck; K Poethkow; Ch Petz; H-Ch Hege; A Spuler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of 4D-DSA with 3D-DSA Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations in Cerebral Aneurysms.

Authors:  S Lang; P Hoelter; A I Birkhold; M Schmidt; J Endres; C Strother; A Doerfler; H Luecking
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  3D cine phase-contrast MRI at 3T in intracranial aneurysms compared with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  P van Ooij; J J Schneiders; H A Marquering; C B Majoie; E van Bavel; A J Nederveen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance angiography as a possible alternative to rotational angiography or computed tomography angiography for assessing cerebrovascular computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Yuya Yoneyama; Haruo Isoda; Kenta Ishiguro; Masaki Terada; Masaki Kamiya; Kenichi Otsubo; Roshani Perera; Takashi Mizuno; Atsushi Fukuyama; Kazuya Takiguchi; Tomoya Watanabe; Takafumi Kosugi; Yoshiaki Komori; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2020-10-12

6.  Impact of main branch stenting on endothelial shear stress: role of side branch diameter, angle and lesion.

Authors:  Henry Y Chen; Issam D Moussa; Charles Davidson; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Hemodynamic changes in a middle cerebral artery aneurysm at follow-up times before and after its rupture: a case report and a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Sejkorová; K D Dennis; H Švihlová; O Petr; G Lanzino; A Hejčl; D Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Intra- and inter-observer variability in intracranial aneurysm segmentation: comparison between CT angiography (semi-automated segmentation software stroke VCAR) and digital subtraction angiography (3D rotational angiography).

Authors:  F D'Argento; A Pedicelli; C Ciardi; E Leone; M Scarabello; A Infante; A Alexandre; E Lozupone; I Valente; C Colosimo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Intracranial aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: the impact on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  J J Schneiders; H A Marquering; L Antiga; R van den Berg; E VanBavel; C B Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Mind the gap: impact of computational fluid dynamics solution strategy on prediction of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics and rupture status indicators.

Authors:  K Valen-Sendstad; D A Steinman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.