Literature DB >> 16491020

Wall shear stress--an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure--in the arterial system in vivo. Discrepancies with theory.

Robert S Reneman1, Theo Arts, Arnold P G Hoeks.   

Abstract

It has been well established that wall shear stress is an important determinant of endothelial cell function and gene expression as well as of its structure. There is increasing evidence that low wall shear stress, as present in artery bifurcations opposite to the flow divider where atherosclerotic lesions preferentially originate, expresses an atherogenic endothelial gene profile. Besides, wall shear stress regulates arterial diameter by modifying the release of vasoactive mediators by endothelial cells. Most of the studies on the influence of wall shear stress on endothelial cell function and structure have been performed in vitro, generally exposing endothelial cells from different vascular regions to an average wall shear stress level calculated according to Poiseuille's law, which does not hold for the in vivo situation, assuming wall shear stress to be constant along the arterial tree. Also in vivo wall shear stress has been determined based upon theory, assuming the velocity profile in arteries to be parabolic, which is generally not the case. Wall shear stress has been calculated, because of the lack of techniques to assess wall shear stress in vivo. In recent years, techniques have been developed to accurately assess velocity profiles in arterioles, using fluorescently labeled particles as flow tracers, and non-invasively in large arteries by means of ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. Wall shear rate is derived from the in vivo recorded velocity profiles and wall shear stress is estimated as the product of wall shear rate and plasma viscosity in arterioles and whole blood viscosity in large arteries. In this review, we will discuss wall shear stress in vivo, paying attention to its assessment and especially to the results obtained in both arterioles and large arteries. The limitations of the methods currently in use are discussed as well. The data obtained in the arterial system in vivo are compared with the theoretically predicted ones, and the consequences of values deviating from theory for in vitro studies are considered. Applications of wall shear stress as in flow-mediated arterial dilation, clinically in use to assess endothelial cell (dys)function, are also addressed. This review starts with some background considerations and some theoretical aspects. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491020     DOI: 10.1159/000091648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Res        ISSN: 1018-1172            Impact factor:   1.934


  86 in total

1.  Apparent PKA activity responds to intermittent hypoxia in bone cells: a redox pathway?

Authors:  Yan-Liang Zhang; Hesam Tavakoli; Mirianas Chachisvilis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  A new flow co-culture system for studying mechanobiology effects of pulse flow waves.

Authors:  Devon Scott-Drechsel; Zhenbi Su; Kendall Hunter; Min Li; Robin Shandas; Wei Tan
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an in vivo reproducibility study.

Authors:  A J Geers; I Larrabide; A G Radaelli; H Bogunovic; M Kim; H A F Gratama van Andel; C B Majoie; E VanBavel; A F Frangi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Noninvasive imaging of atheromatous carotid plaques.

Authors:  Umar Sadat; Zhi-Yong Li; Martin J Graves; Tjun Y Tang; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-03

5.  Measurements of the wall shear stress distribution in the outflow tract of an embryonic chicken heart.

Authors:  C Poelma; K Van der Heiden; B P Hierck; R E Poelmann; J Westerweel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  A bioengineering approach to Schlemm's canal-like stem cell differentiation for in vitro glaucoma drug screening.

Authors:  Yangzi Isabel Tian; Xulang Zhang; Karen Torrejon; John Danias; Sofya Gindina; Ashima Nayyar; Yiqin Du; Yubing Xie
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Flow shear stress regulates endothelial barrier function and expression of angiogenic factors in a 3D microfluidic tumor vascular model.

Authors:  Cara F Buchanan; Scott S Verbridge; Pavlos P Vlachos; Marissa Nichole Rylander
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Nanowell-trapped charged ligand-bearing nanoparticle surfaces: a novel method of enhancing flow-resistant cell adhesion.

Authors:  Phat L Tran; Jessica R Gamboa; Katherine E McCracken; Mark R Riley; Marvin J Slepian; Jeong-Yeol Yoon
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 9.933

9.  High-content adhesion assay to address limited cell samples.

Authors:  Jay W Warrick; Edmond W K Young; Eric G Schmuck; Kurt W Saupe; David J Beebe
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Role of ultrasonic shear rate estimation errors in assessing inflammatory response and vascular risk.

Authors:  Jean K Tsou; Jie Liu; Abdul I Barakat; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.