Literature DB >> 21183155

Comparison of biomechanical loading during use of conventional stud welding equipment and an alternate system.

Nathan B Fethke1, Lauren C Gant, Fred Gerr.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of an alternative welding system designed to reduce exposure to extreme trunk flexion on measures of trunk inclination and muscle activity. Among 10 participants, data were collected while using conventional stud welding equipment and while using the alternate system. Paired t-tests were used to compare results between the two welding systems. Mean trunk inclination angle was reduced with the alternate system (34.4° versus 9.7°, p < 0.01). Percent time with trunk inclination angles greater than 60° was also reduced (40.0% versus 4.7%, p < 0.01). In general, the alternate system resulted in less desirable upper trapezius muscle activity levels. The alternate system appears to be effective in reducing exposure to extreme trunk flexion among stud welders. Continued development of the system should explore features designed to reduce shoulder forces and improve productivity.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21183155     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  8 in total

1.  Reduction of Biomechanical and Welding Fume Exposures in Stud Welding.

Authors:  Nathan B Fethke; Thomas M Peters; Stephanie Leonard; Mahmoud Metwali; Imali A Mudunkotuwa
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-11-23

2.  Biomechanical factors during common agricultural activities: Results of on-farm exposure assessments using direct measurement methods.

Authors:  Nathan B Fethke; Mark C Schall; Howard Chen; Cassidy A Branch; Linda A Merlino
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Data collection costs in industrial environments for three occupational posture exposure assessment methods.

Authors:  Catherine Trask; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Jens Wahlström; Marina Heiden; Mahmoud Rezagholi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Bias and imprecision in posture percentile variables estimated from short exposure samples.

Authors:  Svend Erik Mathiassen; Jens Wahlström; Mikael Forsman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Accuracy and repeatability of an inertial measurement unit system for field-based occupational studies.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Nathan B Fethke; Howard Chen; Sakiko Oyama; David I Douphrate
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.561

6.  Accuracy and precision of variance components in occupational posture recordings: a simulation study of different data collection strategies.

Authors:  Per Liv; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Susanne Wulff Svendsen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Sex differences in task distribution and task exposures among Danish house painters: an observational study combining questionnaire data with biomechanical measurements.

Authors:  Thomas Heilskov-Hansen; Susanne Wulff Svendsen; Jane Frølund Thomsen; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Gert-Åke Hansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluating Swine Injection Technologies as a Workplace Musculoskeletal Injury Intervention: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Catherine Trask; Brenna Bath; Stephan Milosavljevic; Aaron M Kociolek; Bernardo Predicala; Erika Penz; Olugbenga Adebayo; Lee Whittington
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.