Literature DB >> 21182434

Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool.

Corinne Schroder1, Jennifer Medves, Margo Paterson, Vaughan Byrnes, Christine Chapman, Anne O'Riordan, Deborah Pichora, Carly Kelly.   

Abstract

Collaborative practice is receiving increased attention as a model of healthcare delivery that positively influences the effectiveness and efficiency of patient care while improving the work environment of healthcare providers. The collaborative practice assessment tool (CPAT) was developed from the literature to enable interprofessional teams to assess their collaborative practice. The CPAT survey included 56 items across nine domains including: mission and goals; relationships; leadership; role responsibilities and autonomy; communication; decision-making and conflict management; community linkages and coordination; perceived effectiveness and patient involvement; in addition to three open-ended questions. The tool was developed for use in a variety of settings involving a diversity of healthcare providers with the aim of helping teams to identify professional development needs and corresponding educational interventions. The results of two pilot tests indicated that the CPAT is a valid and reliable tool for assessing levels of collaborative practice within teams. This article describes the development of the tool, the pilot testing and validation process, as well as limitations of the tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21182434     DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2010.532620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  18 in total

1.  Development and validation of the primary care team dynamics survey.

Authors:  Hummy Song; Alyna T Chien; Josephine Fisher; Julia Martin; Antoinette S Peters; Karen Hacker; Meredith B Rosenthal; Sara J Singer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools Measuring Interprofessional Education Outcomes Relevant to Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Sarah Shrader; Michelle Z Farland; Jennifer Danielson; Brigitte Sicat; Elena M Umland
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Measuring team factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.

Authors:  Sue E Brennan; Marije Bosch; Heather Buchan; Sally E Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Improving chronic care through continuing education of interprofessional primary healthcare teams: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Jann Paquette-Warren; Sharon Ellen Roberts; Meghan Fournie; Marie Tyler; Judith Brown; Stewart Harris
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.338

5.  Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study.

Authors:  Catherine Donnelly; Lyn Shulha; Don Klinger; Lori Letts
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Organizational Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care: A Framework for Improvement.

Authors:  Jenna M Evans; Agnes Grudniewicz; G Ross Baker; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Suitability of a Programme for Improving Interprofessional Primary Care Team Meetings.

Authors:  Jerôme Jean Jacques van Dongen; Marloes Amantia van Bokhoven; Wilhelmus Nicolaas Marie Goossens; Ramon Daniëls; Trudy van der Weijden; Anna Beurskens
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.120

8.  Feasibility and preliminary effects of an integrated hospital-to-home transitional care intervention for older adults with stroke and multimorbidity: A study protocol.

Authors:  Maureen Markle-Reid; Ruta Valaitis; Amy Bartholomew; Kathryn Fisher; Rebecca Fleck; Jenny Ploeg; Jennifer Salerno; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  J Comorb       Date:  2019-03-07

9.  Implementing a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Hemodialysis Patients in Routine Clinical Care: Perspectives of Patients and Providers on ESAS-r:Renal.

Authors:  Jenna M Evans; Alysha Glazer; Rebecca Lum; Esti Heale; Marnie MacKinnon; Peter G Blake; Michael Walsh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Indicators and Measurement Tools for Health Systems Integration: A Knowledge Synthesis.

Authors:  Esther Suter; Nelly D Oelke; Maria Alice Dias da Silva Lima; Michelle Stiphout; Robert Janke; Regina Rigatto Witt; Cheryl Van Vliet-Brown; Kaela Schill; Mahnoush Rostami; Shelanne Hepp; Arden Birney; Fatima Al-Roubaiai; Giselda Quintana Marques
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.120

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.