Literature DB >> 32843371

Implementing a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Hemodialysis Patients in Routine Clinical Care: Perspectives of Patients and Providers on ESAS-r:Renal.

Jenna M Evans1, Alysha Glazer2, Rebecca Lum2, Esti Heale2, Marnie MacKinnon2, Peter G Blake2,3, Michael Walsh2,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal is a patient-reported outcome measure used to assess physical and psychosocial symptom burden in patients treated with maintenance dialysis. Studies of patient-reported outcome measures suggest the need for deeper understanding of how to optimize their implementation and use. This study examines patient and provider perspectives of the implementation process and the influence of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal on symptom management, patient-provider communication, and interdisciplinary communication. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Eight in-facility hemodialysis programs in Ontario, Canada, assessed patients using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal every 4-6 weeks for 1 year. Screening and completion rates were tracked, and pre- and postimplementation surveys and midimplementation interviews were conducted with patients and providers. A chart audit was conducted 12 months postimplementation.
RESULTS: In total, 1459 patients completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal; 58% of eligible patients completed the preimplementation survey (n=718), and 56% of patients who completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal at least once completed the postimplementation survey (n=569). Provider survey response rates were 71% (n=514) and 54% (n=319), respectively. Nine patients/caregivers from three sites and 48 providers from all sites participated in interviews. A total of 1207 charts were audited. Seven of eight sites had mean screening rates over 80%, suggesting that routine use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal in clinical practice is feasible. However, the multiple data sources painted an inconsistent picture of the value and effect of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal standardized symptom screening processes across providers and sites; improved patient and provider symptom awareness, particularly for psychosocial symptoms; and empowered patients to raise issues with providers. Yet, there was little, if any, statistically significant improvement in the metrics used to assess symptom management, patient-provider communication, and interdisciplinary communication.
CONCLUSIONS: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal patient-reported outcome measure may be useful to standardize symptom screening, enhance awareness of psychosocial symptoms among patients and providers, and empower patients rather than to reduce symptom burden.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic kidney disease; end stage kidney disease; nephrology; patient-reported outcomes; renal; symptom management; symptom screening

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32843371      PMCID: PMC7480546          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01840220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  24 in total

Review 1.  Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Lisa Barbera; Carolyn L Kerrigan; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 2.  The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Maria B Boyce; John P Browne; Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Time to Rethink Our Approach to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for ESRD.

Authors:  Fredric O Finkelstein; Susan H Finkelstein
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials.

Authors:  Grigorios Kotronoulas; Nora Kearney; Roma Maguire; Alison Harrow; David Di Domenico; Suzanne Croy; Stephen MacGillivray
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Cross-sectional validity of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system in dialysis patients: a simple assessment of symptom burden.

Authors:  S N Davison; G S Jhangri; J A Johnson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Gregory Makoul; Edward Krupat; Chih-Hung Chang
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-06-18

7.  Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team: pilot study using the Communication Assessment Tool-Team (CAT-T).

Authors:  Laura Min Mercer; Paula Tanabe; Peter S Pang; Michael A Gisondi; D Mark Courtney; Kirsten G Engel; Sarah M Donlan; James G Adams; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11

8.  Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.

Authors:  Nick Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-28

Review 9.  A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting.

Authors:  Jack Chen; Lixin Ou; Stephanie J Hollis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Functionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PROMs data to improve patient care.

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh; Ray Pawson; Judy Wright; Nick Black; Jose Maria Valderas; David Meads; Elizabeth Gibbons; Laurence Wood; Charlotte Wood; Chris Mills; Sonia Dalkin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  9 in total

1.  A Step in the Right Direction: The Promise of PROMs in Routine Hemodialysis Care.

Authors:  Jane Ogden Schell; Dale Ellen Lupu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Rachel Campbell; Angela Ju; Madeleine T King; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Outcomes after kidney transplantation, let's focus on the patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Yiman Wang; Jaapjan D Snoep; Marc H Hemmelder; Koen E A van der Bogt; Willem Jan W Bos; Paul J M van der Boog; Friedo W Dekker; Aiko P J de Vries; Yvette Meuleman
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-01-20

4.  Patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis patients: results of the first multicenter cross-sectional ePROMs study in France.

Authors:  Abdallah Guerraoui; Mathilde Prezelin-Reydit; Anne Kolko; Marie Lino-Daniel; Charlotte Dumas de Roque; Pablo Urena; Philippe Chauveau; Catherine Lasseur; Julie Haesebaert; Agnes Caillette-Beaudoin
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 5.  Mental Health Care for Adults Treated With Dialysis in Canada: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Laurence Fernandez; Stephanie Thompson; Charlotte Berendonk; Kara Schick-Makaroff
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2022-03-23

6.  How Are Albertans "Adjusting to and Coping With" Dialysis? A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Charlotte Berendonk; Jordan Overwater; Laura Streith; Loretta Lee; Manuel Escoto; Daniel Cukor; Scott Klarenbach; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2022-08-23

7.  Screening for symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients treated with renal replacement therapy: utility of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised.

Authors:  Evan Tang; Sumaya Dano; Nathaniel Edwards; Sara Macanovic; Heather Ford; Susan Bartlett; Doris Howell; Madeline Li; Marta Novak; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Mapping the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised: Renal to the EQ-5D-5L in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Jiabi Wen; Xuejing Jin; Fatima Al Sayah; Hilary Short; Arto Ohinmaa; Sara N Davison; Michael Walsh; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Evaluation of PROMIS Preference Scoring System (PROPr) in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis or Kidney Transplant.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Barry Dewitt; Evan Tang; Daniel Breitner; Mohammed Saqib; Dan Li; Rabail Siddiqui; Nathaniel Edwards; John Devin Peipert; Ron D Hays; Janel Hanmer; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 10.614

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.