Literature DB >> 21181163

Limited role of interim PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP.

Changhoon Yoo1, Dae Ho Lee, Jeong Eun Kim, Jungmin Jo, Dok Hyun Yoon, Byeong Seok Sohn, Sang-We Kim, Jung-Shin Lee, Cheolwon Suh.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been found useful in monitoring response to treatment of malignant lymphoma. We investigated the ability of interim PET to monitor response to standard dose R-CHOP chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naïve patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Between March 2004 and April 2009, 155 DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP and available for interim and post-treatment PET/CT were identified and included in this analysis. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between interim PET/CT-negative and positive group, and among three patient groups which were categorized based on their interim and post-treatment PET/CT: those with early metabolic complete response (mCR), delayed mCR, and never mCR. Interim PET/CT-negative patients (n=100) showed superior CR rates to interim PET/CT-positive patients (n=55; 93% vs 62%, P<0.001). However, there was no difference in PFS (P=0.07) and OS (P=0.24) between interim PET/CT-negative and positive group. We categorized patients into three groups, with 100 (64%) in the early mCR group, 35 (23%) in the delayed mCR group, and 20 (13%) in the never mCR group. Early mCR and delayed mCR group did not differ significantly in PFS (P=0.84) or OS (P=0.20). However, the survival outcome in the never mCR group was significantly inferior to the combined early and delayed mCR group. The result from this study suggests that interim PET/CT might be an inappropriate tool for designing risk-adaptive therapy in chemotherapy-naïve DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP. Prospective trials should be performed to clearly determine the role of interim PET/CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21181163     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-010-1135-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  27 in total

1.  The Association Between Liver and Tumor [18F]FDG Uptake in Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma During Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xingchen Wu; Abhisek Bhattarai; Pasi Korkola; Hannu Pertovaara; Hannu Eskola; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Quantitative Assessment of Interim PET/CT Could Have More Prognostic Relevance than Visual Assessment for Predicting Clinical Outcome of Extranodal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Dong Won Baek; Hee Jeong Cho; Ju-Hyung Kim; Sang Kyun Sohn; Ga-Young Song; Seo-Yeon Ahn; Sung-Hoon Jung; Jae Sook Ahn; Je-Jung Lee; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Shin-Young Jeong; Chae Moon Hong; Jung-Joon Min; Joon-Ho Moon; Deok-Hwan Yang
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  The prognostic value of PET/CT evaluation with Deauville score on the recurrence and survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multi-institutional study of KROG 17-02.

Authors:  Jeong Won Lee; Dongryul Oh; Keun-Yong Eom; Jin Hee Kim; Woo Chul Kim; Mi Joo Chung; Jong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Prognostic value of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Zhitao Ying; Xuejuan Wang; Yuqin Song; Wen Zheng; Xiaopei Wang; Yan Xie; Ningjing Lin; Meifeng Tu; Lingyan Ping; Weiping Liu; Lijuan Deng; Chen Zhang; Zhi Yang; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Dynamic Risk Profiling Using Serial Tumor Biomarkers for Personalized Outcome Prediction.

Authors:  David M Kurtz; Mohammad S Esfahani; Florian Scherer; Joanne Soo; Michael C Jin; Chih Long Liu; Aaron M Newman; Ulrich Dührsen; Andreas Hüttmann; Olivier Casasnovas; Jason R Westin; Matthais Ritgen; Sebastian Böttcher; Anton W Langerak; Mark Roschewski; Wyndham H Wilson; Gianluca Gaidano; Davide Rossi; Jasmin Bahlo; Michael Hallek; Robert Tibshirani; Maximilian Diehn; Ash A Alizadeh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; N George Mikhaeel; Lale Kostakoglu; Michel Meignan; Martin Hutchings; Stefan P Müeller; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; Richard I Fisher; Judith Trotman; Otto S Hoekstra; Rodney J Hicks; Michael J O'Doherty; Roland Hustinx; Alberto Biggi; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prognostic value of interim (18)F-FDG-PET in diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with rituximab-based immune-chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Danxia Zhu; Xiao-Li Xu; Cheng Fang; Mei Ji; Jun Wu; Chang-Ping Wu; Jing-Ting Jiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

8.  Current status of PET/CT in the diagnosis and follow up of lymphomas.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2011

9.  Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume Estimated by (18) F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of Stage II or III Disease.

Authors:  Jihyun Kim; Junshik Hong; Seog Gyun Kim; Kyung Hoon Hwang; Minsu Kim; Hee Kyung Ahn; Sun Jin Sym; Jinny Park; Eun Kyung Cho; Dong Bok Shin; Jae Hoon Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-29

10.  Response-adapted therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas based on early [18F] FDG-PET scanning: ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group study (E3404).

Authors:  Lode J Swinnen; Hailun Li; Andrew Quon; Randy Gascoyne; Fangxin Hong; Erik A Ranheim; Thomas M Habermann; Brad S Kahl; Sandra J Horning; Ranjana H Advani
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.