OBJECTIVES: Sigmoidoscopy is an effective screening test for colorectal cancer but has yet to have a major impact on mortality because, in part, of inadequate utilization by physicians. To address concerns of inefficient use of time and resources, we examined the feasibility of high volume, single-day flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening sessions using an innovative fiberoptic sigmoidoscope with a disposable sheath system. METHODS: All City of Boston employees over the age of 50 yr (n = 6137) were invited by mail to undergo a screening FS at Boston City Hospital (BCH). Respondents (n = 564) were contacted by phone by the program coordinator on receipt of a prepaid postcard and were scheduled (n = 227) consecutively into 15-min slots on 1 of 6 1/2-day (3-h) weekend sessions. Preregistration was completed at BCH during the week before each session and included enrollment, completion of a brief risk questionnaire, documentation of informed consent, and bowel prep instructions. Procedures were performed by three physician endoscopists rotating among four endoscopy rooms per session. Each room was staffed with a nurse to aid in patient care and a technician to set up equipment. RESULTS: A total of 198 of the 227 (87%) scheduled patients underwent screening FS during the three sessions. Physicians performed a mean of 3.5 procedures per room per hour, or 4.7 procedures per hour overall, with a mean depth of scope insertion of 51 +/- 10 cm and a mean procedure time of 4.7 +/- 3.3 min. Equipment set-up time and patient turnaround time averaged 4.6 +/- 1.7 min and 11.0 +/- 6.0 min, respectively. Polyps were detected in 29 (14.6%) patients, and a Dukes' A cancer was detected in one (0.5%). The only complication was a cardiac arrhythmia. A crude estimate of direct costs approximated $ 75 per examination. CONCLUSION: High volume, single-day FS using the fiberoptic sigmoidoscope with a disposable sheath system offers an effective strategy for enhancing physicians compliance, and possibly patient compliance, with screening sigmoidoscopy through more efficient use of time and resources.
OBJECTIVES: Sigmoidoscopy is an effective screening test for colorectal cancer but has yet to have a major impact on mortality because, in part, of inadequate utilization by physicians. To address concerns of inefficient use of time and resources, we examined the feasibility of high volume, single-day flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening sessions using an innovative fiberoptic sigmoidoscope with a disposable sheath system. METHODS: All City of Boston employees over the age of 50 yr (n = 6137) were invited by mail to undergo a screening FS at Boston City Hospital (BCH). Respondents (n = 564) were contacted by phone by the program coordinator on receipt of a prepaid postcard and were scheduled (n = 227) consecutively into 15-min slots on 1 of 6 1/2-day (3-h) weekend sessions. Preregistration was completed at BCH during the week before each session and included enrollment, completion of a brief risk questionnaire, documentation of informed consent, and bowel prep instructions. Procedures were performed by three physician endoscopists rotating among four endoscopy rooms per session. Each room was staffed with a nurse to aid in patient care and a technician to set up equipment. RESULTS: A total of 198 of the 227 (87%) scheduled patients underwent screening FS during the three sessions. Physicians performed a mean of 3.5 procedures per room per hour, or 4.7 procedures per hour overall, with a mean depth of scope insertion of 51 +/- 10 cm and a mean procedure time of 4.7 +/- 3.3 min. Equipment set-up time and patient turnaround time averaged 4.6 +/- 1.7 min and 11.0 +/- 6.0 min, respectively. Polyps were detected in 29 (14.6%) patients, and a Dukes' A cancer was detected in one (0.5%). The only complication was a cardiac arrhythmia. A crude estimate of direct costs approximated $ 75 per examination. CONCLUSION: High volume, single-day FS using the fiberoptic sigmoidoscope with a disposable sheath system offers an effective strategy for enhancing physicians compliance, and possibly patient compliance, with screening sigmoidoscopy through more efficient use of time and resources.
Authors: Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: S Gölder; W Vogt; H Lichti; H C Rath; A Kullmann; J Schölmerich; F Kullmann Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: T R Levin; F A Farraye; R E Schoen; G Hoff; W Atkin; J H Bond; S Winawer; R W Burt; D A Johnson; L M Kirk; S C Litin; D K Rex Journal: Gut Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 23.059