Literature DB >> 12479764

Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin vs usual care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT).

.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Studies have demonstrated that statins administered to individuals with risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) reduce CHD events. However, many of these studies were too small to assess all-cause mortality or outcomes in important subgroups.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pravastatin compared with usual care reduces all-cause mortality in older, moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive participants with at least 1 additional CHD risk factor. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Multicenter (513 primarily community-based North American clinical centers), randomized, nonblinded trial conducted from 1994 through March 2002 in a subset of participants from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory persons (n = 10 355), aged 55 years or older, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of 120 to 189 mg/dL (100 to 129 mg/dL if known CHD) and triglycerides lower than 350 mg/dL, were randomized to pravastatin (n = 5170) or to usual care (n = 5185). Baseline mean total cholesterol was 224 mg/dL; LDL-C, 146 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 48 mg/dL; and triglycerides, 152 mg/dL. Mean age was 66 years, 49% were women, 38% black and 23% Hispanic, 14% had a history of CHD, and 35% had type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTION: Pravastatin, 40 mg/d, vs usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with follow-up for up to 8 years. Secondary outcomes included nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal CHD (CHD events) combined, cause-specific mortality, and cancer.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 4.8 years. During the trial, 32% of usual care participants with and 29% without CHD started taking lipid-lowering drugs. At year 4, total cholesterol levels were reduced by 17% with pravastatin vs 8% with usual care; among the random sample who had LDL-C levels assessed, levels were reduced by 28% with pravastatin vs 11% with usual care. All-cause mortality was similar for the 2 groups (relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.11; P =.88), with 6-year mortality rates of 14.9% for pravastatin vs 15.3% with usual care. CHD event rates were not significantly different between the groups (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.04; P =.16), with 6-year CHD event rates of 9.3% for pravastatin and 10.4% for usual care.
CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin did not reduce either all-cause mortality or CHD significantly when compared with usual care in older participants with well-controlled hypertension and moderately elevated LDL-C. The results may be due to the modest differential in total cholesterol (9.6%) and LDL-C (16.7%) between pravastatin and usual care compared with prior statin trials supporting cardiovascular disease prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12479764     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.23.2998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  310 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging biomarkers for Parkinson disease: facts and fantasy.

Authors:  Joel S Perlmutter; Scott A Norris
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 2.  New and emerging data from clinical trials of statins.

Authors:  John C LaRosa
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Toxicity of antilipidemic agents: facts and fictions.

Authors:  Antonios M Xydakis; Peter H Jones
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Management of dyslipidaemia.

Authors:  Gilbert R Thompson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  [Recommendations of the European Stroke Initiative (EUSI) for treatment of ischemic stroke--update 2003. Part 2: prevention and rehabilitation].

Authors:  Sonja Külkens; Peter Arthur Ringleb; Werner Hacke
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in people with diabetes.

Authors:  John A Farmer
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  João Costa; Margarida Borges; Cláudio David; António Vaz Carneiro
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-03

Review 8.  Treatment of lipids and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kathie L Hermayer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Bayesian regression model for recurrent event data with event-varying covariate effects and event effect.

Authors:  Li-An Lin; Sheng Luo; Barry R Davis
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 1.404

10.  Urinary angiotensinogen as a novel biomarker of the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system status in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kobori; A Brent Alper; Rajesh Shenava; Akemi Katsurada; Toshie Saito; Naro Ohashi; Maki Urushihara; Kayoko Miyata; Ryousuke Satou; L Lee Hamm; L Gabriel Navar
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.