| Literature DB >> 21179323 |
Sanaa Ahmed Ali1, Lilla Faddah, Ateff Abdel-Baky, Asmaa Bayoumi.
Abstract
This study provides an information about the mechanisms of liver injury induced by CCl(4), and determines the influence of administration of L-carnitine or/and CoQ10 as prophylactic agents against CCl(4) deteriorative effect. The study was carried out on 80 adult male albino rats divided into eight groups, 10 animals each, as follows: four normal groups (control, treated with L-carnitine, treated with CoQ10, and treated with a combination of Lcarnitine and CoQ10) and four liver injury groups treated with CCl(4) (control, treated with L-carnitine, treated with CoQ10, and treated with a combination of L-carnitine and CoQ10). Liver injury was induced by s.c. injection of a single dose of CCl(4) (1 ml/kg). L-carnitine (50 mg/kg/day) was given i.p. for four successive days 24 hours before CCl(4) injection, and CoQ10 (200 mg/kg) was given as a single i.p. dose 24 hours before CCl(4) injection. Animals were sacrificed 24 hours after CCl(4) injection, blood samples were withdrawn and liver tissue samples were homogenized. The levels of the following parameters were determined: hepatic reduced glutathione, serum ALT and AST, hepatic lipid peroxides, hepatic vitamin C, hepatic and serum total protein, serum albumin, serum sialic acid, serum nitrite, and serum and hepatic total LDH activities and LDH isoenzymes. The obtained data revealed that CCl(4) injection produced a significant decrease in reduced glutathione content, vitamin C, total protein and albumin levels. However, there was a significant increase in serum ALT and AST activities, lipid peroxides, sialic acid, nitric oxide, serum and hepatic total LDH activities. On the other hand, groups treated with L-carnitine or/and CoQ10 prior to CCl(4) injection showed an improvement in most parameters when compared with cirrhotic control group. It has been concluded that L-carnitine and coenzyme Q10 have a pronounced prophylactic effect against liver damage induced by halogenated alkanes such as carbon tetrachloride.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon tetrachloride; Coenzyme Q10; L-carnitine; Liver; Rats; Serum
Year: 2010 PMID: 21179323 PMCID: PMC3007612 DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1006-02
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Pharm ISSN: 0036-8709
Fig. 1.Structure of L-Carnitine
Fig. 2.The Redox Transitions of CoQ10
Levels of ALT, AST, albumin, Nitrate, Sialic acid, total protein and LDH activity in the serum of different groups.
| ALT (U/ml) | 29.32 ± 2.57 | 27.18 ± 3.22 | 16.397 | 26.38 ± 3.91 | 37.49 | 29.59 | 21.03 | 21.05 |
| AST (U/ml) | 71.19 ± 5.16 | 62.38 | 56.45 | 59.85 | 109.82 | 90.82 | 87.66 | 84.09 |
| Albumin (gm/dl) | 6.17 ± 0.118 | 6.11 ± 0.19 | 6.17 ± 0.1338 | 5.89 ± 0.21 | 4.72 | 5.59 | 5.39 | 6.06 |
| Nitrite (μmol/L) | 16.01 ± 1.11 | 7.40 | 13.38 ± 2.635 | 16.64 ± 1.36 | 26.79 | 22.53 | 24.07 ± 2.58 | 18.45 |
| Sialic Acid (mg/dl) | 54.55 ± 4.59 | 36.86 | 45.69 ± 9.383 | 44.71 ± 9.19 | 94.59 | 58.49 | 52.28 | 51.6 |
| Total Protein (mg/ml) | 19.3 ± 0.42 | 17.32 ± 1.26 | 20.8 ± 0.91 | 20.8 ± 0.59 | 5.5 | 14.07 | 18.1 | 18.53 |
| LDH (μmol/mg protein/min) | 81.42 ± 13.47 | 77 | 49.15 | 91.14 | 209.6 | 164.8 | 150.7 | 128.3 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD of ten rats in each group. Treated normal groups are compared with normal control group CCL4-Injury group is compared with normal control group. Treated CCL4 groups are compared with cirrhotic control group. Difference between groups is analyzed by one-way ANOVA, where:
…significantly different from group I at P < 0.05;
…significantly different from group V at P < 0.05.
Levels of GSH, Lipid peroxide, Vit. C, total protein, LDH activity in the liver of different groups.
| GSH (mg/gm tissue) | 3.93 ± 0.07 | 5.33 | 6.186 | 5.811 | 2.507 | 3.638 | 3.572 | 3.67 |
| Lipid peroxide (nmol/mg protein) | 2.568 ± 0.12 | 2.251 | 2.339 ± 0.32 | 1.683 | 5.985 | 3.77 | 3.48 | 3.555 |
| Vit C (ascorbic acid) (μg/gm tissue) | 101.08 ± 8.06 | 99.47 ± 6.61 | 90.81 ± 9.34 | 93.185 ± 11.28 | 51.26 | 67.86 | 79.112 | 81.49 |
| Total Protein (mg/gm tissue) | 250.11 ± 23.58 | 258.28 ± 35.71 | 256.05 ± 8.83 | 287.96 | 176.48 | 217.24 | 232.99 | 248 |
| LDH (μmol/mg protein/min) | 114 ± 1.06 | 88.9 | 99.57 | 97.6 | 181.9 | 163.9 | 155.3 | 134.9 |
Data are expressed as Mean ± SD of ten rats in each group. Difference between groups is analyzed by one-way ANOVA, where:
…significantly different from group I at P < 0.05;
…significantly different from group V at P < 0.05.
Total activity of hepatic LDH Isoenzymes.
| LDH-1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| LDH-2 | 1.01 | 1.298 | 1.47 | 1.11 | 1.32 | 1.72 | 2.05 | 1.43 |
| LDH-3 | 1.85 | 1.242 | 2.99 | 3.89 | 2.09 | 3.74 | 2.85 | 2.44 |
| LDH-4 | 2.60 | 2.6 | 9.84 | 9.74 | 2.29 | 16.88 | 15.22 | 23.29 |
| LDH-5 | 108.54 | 83.76 | 85.27 | 82.89 | 176.20 | 141.57 | 135.19 | 107.74 |
Data are expressed as Values are expressed in Mean ± SD of ten rats in each group. Difference between groups is analyzed By one-way ANOVA, where:
…significantly different from group I at P < 0.05;
…significantly different from group V at P < 0.05.
Fig. 3.Electrophoretic Profile of Lactate Dehydrogenase Isoenzymes (LDH-Isoenzymes) of Male Rats (Liver & Serum).
Total activity of serum LDH Isoenzymes.
| LDH-1 | 1.33 | 1.74 | 0.83 | 3.14 | 6.55 | 3.47 | 3.86 | 3.05 |
| LDH-2 | 1.71 | 1.62 | 1.16 | 3.72 | 7.61 | 8.86 | 4.49 | 3.98 |
| LDH-3 | 3.38 | 4.43 | 1.21 | 3.66 | 4.89 | 8.88 | 3.83 | 3.39 |
| LDH-4 | 4.25 | 6.64 | 3.07 | 5.59 | 5.48 | 9.27 | 5.35 | 5.10 |
| LDH-5 | 70.74 | 62.58 | 42.88 | 75.02 | 185.06 | 134.33 | 133.16 | 111.88 |
Data are expressed as Values are expressed in Mean ± SD of ten rats in each group. Difference between groups is analyzed By one-way ANOVA, where:
…significantly different from group I at P < 0.05;
…significantly different from group V at P < 0.05.