Literature DB >> 21178956

An orthotopic model of serous ovarian cancer in immunocompetent mice for in vivo tumor imaging and monitoring of tumor immune responses.

Selene Nunez-Cruz1, Denise C Connolly, Nathalie Scholler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is generally diagnosed at an advanced stage where the case/fatality ratio is high and thus remains the most lethal of all gynecologic malignancies among US women. Serous tumors are the most widespread forms of ovarian cancer and the Tg-MISIIR-TAg transgenic represents the only mouse model that spontaneously develops this type of tumors. Tg-MISIIR-TAg mice express SV40 transforming region under control of the Mullerian Inhibitory Substance type II Receptor (MISIIR) gene promoter. Additional transgenic lines have been identified that express the SV40 TAg transgene, but do not develop ovarian tumors. Non-tumor prone mice exhibit typical lifespan for C57Bl/6 mice and are fertile. These mice can be used as syngeneic allograft recipients for tumor cells isolated from Tg-MISIIR-TAg-DR26 mice.
OBJECTIVE: Although tumor imaging is possible, early detection of deep tumors is challenging in small living animals. To enable preclinical studies in an immunologically intact animal model for serous ovarian cancer, we describe a syngeneic mouse model for this type of ovarian cancer that permits in vivo imaging, studies of the tumor microenvironment and tumor immune responses.
METHODS: We first derived a TAg+ mouse cancer cell line (MOV1) from a spontaneous ovarian tumor harvested in a 26 week-old DR26 Tg-MISIIR-TAg female. Then, we stably transduced MOV1 cells with TurboFP635 Lentivirus mammalian vector that encodes Katushka, a far-red mutant of the red fluorescent protein from sea anemone Entacmaea quadricolor with excitation/emission maxima at 588/635 nm. We orthotopically implanted MOV1(Kat) in the ovary of non-tumor prone Tg-MISIIR-TAg female mice. Tumor progression was followed by in vivo optical imaging and tumor microenvironment was analyzed by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Orthotopically implanted MOV1(Kat) cells developed serous ovarian tumors. MOV1(Kat) tumors could be visualized by in vivo imaging up to three weeks after implantation (fig. 1) and were infiltrated with leukocytes, as observed in human ovarian cancers (fig. 2).
CONCLUSIONS: We describe an orthotopic model of ovarian cancer suitable for in vivo imaging of early tumors due to the high pH-stability and photostability of Katushka in deep tissues. We propose the use of this novel syngeneic model of serous ovarian cancer for in vivo imaging studies and monitoring of tumor immune responses and immunotherapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21178956      PMCID: PMC3159604          DOI: 10.3791/2146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology, and pathology.

Authors:  N Auersperg; A S Wong; K C Choi; S K Kang; P C Leung
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  The case for early detection.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Nicole Urban; Scott Ramsey; Martin McIntosh; Stephen Schwartz; Brian Reid; Jerald Radich; Garnet Anderson; Leland Hartwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  A better fluorescent protein for whole-body imaging.

Authors:  Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Bright far-red fluorescent protein for whole-body imaging.

Authors:  Dmitry Shcherbo; Ekaterina M Merzlyak; Tatiana V Chepurnykh; Arkady F Fradkov; Galina V Ermakova; Elena A Solovieva; Konstantin A Lukyanov; Ekaterina A Bogdanova; Andrey G Zaraisky; Sergey Lukyanov; Dmitriy M Chudakov
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-08-26       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  A patient-like orthotopic implantation nude mouse model of highly metastatic human ovarian cancer.

Authors:  K Kiguchi; T Kubota; D Aoki; Y Udagawa; S Yamanouchi; M Saga; A Amemiya; F X Sun; S Nozawa; A R Moossa; R M Hoffman
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Activation of cancer-specific gene expression by the survivin promoter.

Authors:  Rudi Bao; Denise C Connolly; Maureen Murphy; Jeffrey Green; Jillian K Weinstein; Debra A Pisarcik; Thomas C Hamilton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-04-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Xenograft and Transgenic Mouse Models of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Non Invasive Imaging Modalities to Monitor Ovarian Tumor Growth In situ -Applications in Evaluating Novel Therapeutic Agents.

Authors:  Denise C Connolly; Harvey H Hensley
Journal:  Curr Protoc Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-01

8.  Performance of the red-shifted fluorescent proteins in deep-tissue molecular imaging applications.

Authors:  Nikolaos C Deliolanis; Randa Kasmieh; Thomas Wurdinger; Bakhos A Tannous; Khalid Shah; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Human ovarian carcinoma metastatic models constructed in nude mice by orthotopic transplantation of histologically-intact patient specimens.

Authors:  X Fu; R M Hoffman
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Assessing lead time of selected ovarian cancer biomarkers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Martin McIntosh; Lieling Wu; Matt Barnett; Gary Goodman; Jason D Thorpe; Lindsay Bergan; Mark D Thornquist; Nathalie Scholler; Nam Kim; Kathy O'Briant; Charles Drescher; Nicole Urban
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  7 in total

1.  Characterization of ovarian cancer cell lines as in vivo models for preclinical studies.

Authors:  Lidia Hernandez; Marianne K Kim; L Tiffany Lyle; Kristen P Bunch; Carrie D House; Franklin Ning; Anne M Noonan; Christina M Annunziata
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Optoacoustic imaging identifies ovarian cancer using a microenvironment targeted theranostic wormhole mesoporous silica nanoparticle.

Authors:  Abhilash Samykutty; William E Grizzle; Benjamin L Fouts; Molly W McNally; Phillip Chuong; Alexandra Thomas; Akiko Chiba; Dennis Otali; Anna Woloszynska; Neveen Said; Peter J Frederick; Jacek Jasinski; Jie Liu; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Modeling spontaneous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in mice following nephrectomy.

Authors:  Amanda Tracz; Michalis Mastri; Christina R Lee; Roberto Pili; John M L Ebos
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  From seeing to believing: labelling strategies for in vivo cell-tracking experiments.

Authors:  Fränze Progatzky; Margaret J Dallman; Cristina Lo Celso
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Withaferin a alone and in combination with cisplatin suppresses growth and metastasis of ovarian cancer by targeting putative cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Sham S Kakar; Mariusz Z Ratajczak; Karen S Powell; Mana Moghadamfalahi; Donald M Miller; Surinder K Batra; Sanjay K Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan F Anker; Hanlin Mok; Anum F Naseem; Praveen Thumbikat; Sarki A Abdulkadir
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Development of a clinically relevant ovarian cancer model incorporating surgical cytoreduction to evaluate treatment of micro-metastatic disease.

Authors:  Christopher B Morse; Valentin Voillet; Breanna M Bates; Edison Y Chiu; Nicolas M Garcia; Raphael Gottardo; Philip D Greenberg; Kristin G Anderson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.304

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.