Literature DB >> 30118979

Optoacoustic imaging identifies ovarian cancer using a microenvironment targeted theranostic wormhole mesoporous silica nanoparticle.

Abhilash Samykutty1, William E Grizzle2, Benjamin L Fouts3, Molly W McNally1, Phillip Chuong4, Alexandra Thomas5, Akiko Chiba6, Dennis Otali2, Anna Woloszynska7, Neveen Said1, Peter J Frederick8, Jacek Jasinski9, Jie Liu10, Lacey R McNally11.   

Abstract

At the intersection of the newly emerging fields of optoacoustic imaging and theranostic nanomedicine, promising clinical progress can be made in dismal prognosis of ovarian cancer. An acidic pH targeted wormhole mesoporous silica nanoparticle (V7-RUBY) was developed to serve as a novel tumor specific theranostic nanoparticle detectable using multispectral optoacoustic tomographic (MSOT) imaging. We report the synthesis of a small, < 40 nm, biocompatible asymmetric wormhole pore mesoporous silica core particle that has both large loading capacity and favorable release kinetics combined with tumor-specific targeting and gatekeeping. V7-RUBY exploits the acidic tumor microenvironment for tumor-specific targeting and tumor-specific release. In vitro, treatment with V7-RUBY containing either paclitaxel or carboplatin resulted in increased cell death at pH 6.6 in comparison to drug alone (p < 0.0001). In orthotopic ovarian xenograft mouse models, V7-RUBY containing IR780 was specifically detected within the tumor 7X and 4X higher than the liver and >10X higher than in the kidney using both multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) imaging with secondary confirmation using near infrared fluorescence imaging (p < 0.0004). The V7-RUBY system carrying a cargo of either contrast agent or an anti-neoplastic drug has the potential to become a theranostic nanoparticle which can improve both diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetric wormhole pore; Extracellular pH; Mesoporous silica nanoparticle; Multispectral optoacoustic tomography; Ovarian cancer; Theranostic nanoparticle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30118979      PMCID: PMC6289590          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  68 in total

1.  Impacts of mesoporous silica nanoparticle size, pore ordering, and pore integrity on hemolytic activity.

Authors:  Yu-Shen Lin; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Influence of nanoparticle shape, size, and surface functionalization on cellular uptake.

Authors:  Ningning Ma; Chao Ma; Chuanyan Li; Ting Wang; Yongjun Tang; Hongyin Wang; Xianbo Moul; Zhan Chen; Nongyue Hel
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-10

3.  Orthotopic pancreatic tumors detected by optoacoustic tomography using Syndecan-1.

Authors:  Charles W Kimbrough; Shanice Hudson; Anil Khanal; Michael E Egger; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 4.  Development of nanoscale approaches for ovarian cancer therapeutics and diagnostics.

Authors:  Sarah A Engelberth; Nadine Hempel; Magnus Bergkvist
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2014

5.  From The Mine to Cancer Therapy: Natural and Biodegradable Theranostic Silicon Nanocarriers from Diatoms for Sustained Delivery of Chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Shaheer Maher; Tushar Kumeria; Ye Wang; Gagandeep Kaur; Dina Fathalla; Gihan Fetih; Abel Santos; Fawzia Habib; Andreas Evdokiou; Dusan Losic
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation.

Authors:  I F Tannock; D Rotin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Harnessing the potential of lipid-based nanomedicines for type-specific ovarian cancer treatments.

Authors:  Ada W Y Leung; Jessica Kalra; Nancy Dos Santos; Marcel B Bally; Michael S Anglesio
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.307

8.  Identification of pancreatic tumors in vivo with ligand-targeted, pH responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles by multispectral optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Marie K Gurka; Dillon Pender; Phillip Chuong; Benjamin L Fouts; Alexander Sobelov; Molly W McNally; Megan Mezera; Shiao Y Woo; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Role of New Functional MRI Techniques in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Followup of Gynecological Cancer: Comparison with PET-CT.

Authors:  Elena Alvarez Moreno; Mar Jimenez de la Peña; Raquel Cano Alonso
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-01-18

10.  Nadir CA-125 level as prognosis indicator of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Xia Xu; Yan Wang; Fang Wang; Lizhou Jia; Yiqin Zhou; Fei Deng; Junwei Qu; Bifang Zhou; Aifeng Meng; Bole Fu; Xiaoxiang Chen; Zhiying Qian; Jinhua Wang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.234

View more
  13 in total

1.  In vivo Targeting of Liver Cancer with Tissue- and Nuclei-Specific Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-Based Nanocarriers in mice.

Authors:  Ziqiang Ding; Dujin Wang; Wei Shi; Xiaomei Yang; Siliang Duan; Fengzhen Mo; Xiaoqiong Hou; Aiqun Liu; Xiaoling Lu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 2.  Current Update on Nanotechnology-Based Approaches in Ovarian Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Boddapati Kalyani Bhardwaj; Sanu Thankachan; Priyanila Magesh; Thejaswini Venkatesh; Rie Tsutsumi; Padmanaban S Suresh
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  Nanotheranostics for Image-Guided Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Isabel S Dennahy; Zheng Han; William M MacCuaig; Hunter M Chalfant; Anna Condacse; Jordan M Hagood; Juan C Claros-Sorto; Wajeeha Razaq; Jennifer Holter-Chakrabarty; Ronald Squires; Barish H Edil; Ajay Jain; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 4.  Targeted contrast agents and activatable probes for photoacoustic imaging of cancer.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhao; Chelsea B Swartchick; Jefferson Chan
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 60.615

Review 5.  Nanoarchitectured prototypes of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for innovative biomedical applications.

Authors:  Ranjith Kumar Kankala; Ya-Hui Han; Hong-Ying Xia; Shi-Bin Wang; Ai-Zheng Chen
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 10.435

6.  In vivo tracking of orally-administered particles within the gastrointestinal tract of murine models using multispectral optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Neal Bhutiani; Abhilash Samykutty; Kelly M McMasters; Nejat K Egilmez; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2018-11-17

Review 7.  Active Cellular and Subcellular Targeting of Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Okhil K Nag; James B Delehanty
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 8.  Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: Properties and Strategies for Enhancing Clinical Effect.

Authors:  Alex N Frickenstein; Jordan M Hagood; Collin N Britten; Brandon S Abbott; Molly W McNally; Catherine A Vopat; Eian G Patterson; William M MacCuaig; Ajay Jain; Keisha B Walters; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Improved pentamethine cyanine nanosensors for optoacoustic imaging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Laramie; Benjamin L Fouts; William M MacCuaig; Emmanuel Buabeng; Meredith A Jones; Priyabrata Mukherjee; Bahareh Behkam; Lacey R McNally; Maged Henary
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Small Molecule Optoacoustic Contrast Agents: An Unexplored Avenue for Enhancing In Vivo Imaging.

Authors:  Matt D Laramie; Mary K Smith; Fahad Marmarchi; Lacey R McNally; Maged Henary
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.