Literature DB >> 21178236

The accuracy of dose calculations by anisotropic analytical algorithms for stereotactic radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

M W K Kan1, J Y C Cheung, L H T Leung, B M F Lau, P K N Yu.   

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal tumors are commonly treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. For photon dose calculations, problems related to loss of lateral electronic equilibrium exist when small fields are used. The anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) implemented in Varian Eclipse was developed to replace the pencil beam convolution (PBC) algorithm for more accurate dose prediction in an inhomogeneous medium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the AAA for predicting interface doses for intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy boost of nasopharyngeal tumors. The central axis depth dose data and dose profiles of phantoms with rectangular air cavities for small fields were measured using a 6 MV beam. In addition, the air-tissue interface doses from six different intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy plans were measured in an anthropomorphic phantom. The nasopharyngeal region of the phantom was especially modified to simulate the air cavities of a typical patient. The measured data were compared to the data calculated by both the AAA and the PBC algorithm. When using single small fields in rectangular air cavity phantoms, both AAA and PBC overestimated the central axis dose at and beyond the first few millimeters of the air-water interface. Although the AAA performs better than the PBC algorithm, its calculated interface dose could still be more than three times that of the measured dose when a 2 × 2 cm(2) field was used. Testing of the algorithms using the anthropomorphic phantom showed that the maximum overestimation by the PBC algorithm was 20.7%, while that by the AAA was 8.3%. When multiple fields were used in a patient geometry, the dose prediction errors of the AAA would be substantially reduced compared with those from a single field. However, overestimation of more than 3% could still be found at some points at the air-tissue interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21178236     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Design and development of a new micro-beam treatment planning system: effectiveness of algorithms of optimization and dose calculations and potential of micro-beam treatment.

Authors:  Hidenobu Tachibana; Hiroyuki Kojima; Noritaka Yusa; Satoshi Miyajima; Akihisa Tsuda; Takashi Yamashita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-04-29

2.  Accuracy Evaluation of Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition Algorithms for the Nasopharynx Interface in the Early Stage of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan-Chun Lai; Li-Chung Hung; Chien-Chung Jeng; Chen-Ju Feng; Tung-Hao Chang; Shih-Ming Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Evaluation of pencil beam convolution and anisotropic analytical algorithms in stereotactic lung irradiation.

Authors:  Tania De La Fuente Herman; Kerry Hibbitts; Terence Herman; Salahuddin Ahmad
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-10

4.  Dose calculation of Acuros XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment with flattening filter free beams and the potential role of calculation grid size.

Authors:  Baotian Huang; Lili Wu; Peixian Lin; Chuangzhen Chen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Impact of delivery characteristics on dose delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy for different treatment sites.

Authors:  Jiaqi Li; Xile Zhang; Jun Li; Rongtao Jiang; Jing Sui; Maria F Chan; Ruijie Yang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  A review on the use of grid-based Boltzmann equation solvers for dose calculation in external photon beam treatment planning.

Authors:  Monica W K Kan; Peter K N Yu; Lucullus H T Leung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Dosimetric impact of intermediate dose calculation for optimization convergence error.

Authors:  Byung Do Park; Tae Gyu Kim; Jong Eon Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-21

8.  Commissioning and comprehensive evaluation of the ArcCHECK cylindrical diode array for VMAT pretreatment delivery QA.

Authors:  Vibha Chaswal; Michael Weldon; Nilendu Gupta; Arnab Chakravarti; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Clinical implication in the use of the AAA algorithm versus the AXB in nasopharyngeal carcinomas by comparison of TCP and NTCP values.

Authors:  Antonella Bufacchi; Orietta Caspiani; Giulia Rambaldi; Luca Marmiroli; Giuseppe Giovinazzo; Mattia Polsoni
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Effects of different CT value assignment methods on dose calculations in radiotherapy planning for brain metastases.

Authors:  Jianxin Ren; Guanzhong Gong; Xingmin Ma; Xinsen Yao; Yong Yin
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.