Literature DB >> 21177395

Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers.

Marjolein H Liedenbaum1, Shandra Bipat, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Roy S Dwarkasing, Margriet C de Haan, Roel J Jansen, Dominique Kauffman, Christiaan van der Leij, Manou S de Lijster, Cindy C Lute, Marije P van der Paardt, Maarten G Thomeer, Ijsbrand A Zijlstra, Jaap Stoker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine how many computed tomographic (CT) colonography training studies have to be evaluated by novice readers to obtain an adequate level of competence in polyp detection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Six physicians (one radiologist, three radiology residents, two researchers) and three technicians completed a CT colonography training program. Two hundred CT colonographic examinations with colonoscopic verification were selected from a research database, with 100 CT colonographic examinations with at least one polyp 6 mm or larger. After a lecture session and short individual hands-on training, CT colonography training was done individually with immediate feedback of colonoscopy outcome. Per-polyp sensitivity was calculated for four sets of 50 CT colonographic examinations for lesions 6 mm or larger. By using logistic regression analyses, the number of CT colonographic examinations to reach 90% sensitivity for lesions 6 mm or larger was estimated. Reading times were registered.
RESULTS: The average per-polyp sensitivity for lesions 6 mm or larger was 76% (207 of 270) in the first set of 50 CT colonographic examinations, 77% (262 of 342) in the second (P = .96 vs first set), 80% (310 of 387) in the third (P = .67 vs first set), and 91% (261 of 288) in the fourth (P = .018). The estimated number of CT colonographic examinations for a sufficient sensitivity was 164. Six of nine readers reached this level of competence within 175 CT colonographic examinations. Reading times decreased significantly from the first to the second set of 50 CT colonographic examinations for six readers.
CONCLUSION: Novice CT colonography readers obtained sensitivity equal to that of experienced readers after practicing on average 164 CT colonographic studies. © RSNA, 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21177395     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Water-enema multidetector computed tomography for planning surgery.

Authors:  A Venara; C Ridereau-Zins; L Toque; E Cesbron; S Michalak; E Lermite; C Aube; A Hamy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Silvia Delsanto; Daniela Sacchetto; Loredana Correale; Massimo Falchini; Andrea Ferraris; Giovanni Gandini; Giulia Grazzini; Franco Iafrate; Gabriella Iussich; Lia Morra; Andrea Laghi; Mario Mascalchi; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of sensitivity of lung nodule detection between radiologists and technologists on low-dose CT lung cancer screening images.

Authors:  R Kakinuma; K Ashizawa; T Kobayashi; A Fukushima; H Hayashi; T Kondo; M Machida; M Matsusako; K Minami; K Oikado; M Okuda; S Takamatsu; M Sugawara; S Gomi; Y Muramatsu; K Hanai; Y Muramatsu; M Kaneko; R Tsuchiya; N Moriyama
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  [CT colonography as routine method].

Authors:  G Böhm; T Mang; M Gschwendtner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence and Characteristics of the Serrated Polyp Spectrum.

Authors:  David H Kim; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; B Dustin Pooler; Jennifer M Weiss; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography.

Authors:  Thomas Mang; Luca Bogoni; Vikram X Anand; Dass Chandra; Andrew J Curtin; Anna S Lev-Toaff; Gerardo Hermosillo; Ralph Noah; Vikas Raykar; Marcos Salganicoff; Robert Shaw; Susan Summerton; Rafel F R Tappouni; Helmut Ringel; Michael Weber; Matthias Wolf; Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Time-efficient CT colonography interpretation using an advanced image-gallery-based, computer-aided "first-reader" workflow for the detection of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Thomas Mang; Gerardo Hermosillo; Matthias Wolf; Luca Bogoni; Marcos Salganicoff; Vikas Raykar; Helmut Ringl; Michael Weber; Christina Mueller-Mang; Anno Graser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Unit costs in population-based colorectal cancer screening using CT colonography performed in university hospitals in The Netherlands.

Authors:  M C de Haan; M Thomeer; J Stoker; E Dekker; E J Kuipers; M van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.