Literature DB >> 25722102

Water-enema multidetector computed tomography for planning surgery.

A Venara1, C Ridereau-Zins, L Toque, E Cesbron, S Michalak, E Lermite, C Aube, A Hamy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Water-enema multidetector computed tomography (WE-MDCT) is a technique for the localization and preoperative T- and N-stage assessments of colon cancer. It may be a useful tool for planning surgery. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of WE-MDCT for T-staging and its ability to locate tumors for laparoscopy planning. The secondary aim was to assess reading reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy for the preoperative determination of N-stage.
METHODS: We performed a study to evaluate preoperative WE-MDCT for surgical planning in patients with symptomatic colon adenocarcinomas who underwent surgery between June 2010 and January 2014. A radiologist and a surgeon read the WE-MDCTs separately. Results were compared with colonoscopy and the surgical specimen.
RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (42 men (59.1%); mean age 73.1 years (range 45 to 95)) were included. Seventy-six tumors were assessed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for location as determined by surgery and that determined by WE-MDCT was 1, and the ICC for location between colonoscopy and WE-MDCT was 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.91). For T-stage determination, sensitivity was 96 and 94% and specificity 83 and 88% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The T-stage assessment allowed for the programing of surgical access and showed good sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of invasion in adjacent organs.
CONCLUSION: WE-MDCT is relatively easy to perform, and its results can be read effectively by radiologists and surgeons. WE-MDCT indicated the location of tumors perfectly and permitted a good determination of their T-stage. The technique is thus pertinent for the planning of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25722102     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2172-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  28 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography: Why? When? How?

Authors:  C Ridereau-Zins; F Pilleul; Y Gandon; V Laurent
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.026

Review 2.  [Perioperative care in digestive surgery].

Authors:  C Mariette; A Alves; S Benoist; F Bretagnol; J Y Mabrut; K Slim
Journal:  J Chir (Paris)       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

3.  Use of an endoscopically placed clip can avoid diagnostic errors in colonoscopy.

Authors:  N Tabibian; P A Michaletz; J T Schwartz; M C Heiser; W B Dixon; J L Smith; D Y Graham
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Leaving a mark: the frequency and accuracy of tattooing prior to laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P J Conaghan; C A Maxwell-Armstrong; M V Garrioch; L Hong; A G Acheson
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Accuracy of radiological staging in identifying high-risk colon cancer patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicentre experience.

Authors:  S Dighe; I Swift; L Magill; K Handley; R Gray; P Quirke; D Morton; M Seymour; B Warren; G Brown
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 6.  Diagnostic precision of CT in local staging of colon cancers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Dighe; S Purkayastha; I Swift; P P Tekkis; A Darzi; R A'Hern; G Brown
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 7.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Kwok; I P Bissett; G L Hill
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Impact of contrast-enhanced computed tomography colonography on laparoscopic surgical planning of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicola Flor; Andrea Pisani Ceretti; Miriam Mezzanzanica; Paolo Rigamonti; Mauro Peri; Silvia Tresoldi; Simone Soldi; Benedetto Mangiavillano; Francesco Sardanelli; Gian Paolo Cornalba
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2013-10

9.  Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Wendy Atkin; Edward Dadswell; Kate Wooldrage; Ines Kralj-Hans; Christian von Wagner; Rob Edwards; Guiqing Yao; Clive Kay; David Burling; Omar Faiz; Julian Teare; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Jane Wardle; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Differences in survival between colon and rectal cancer from SEER data.

Authors:  Yen-Chien Lee; Yen-Lin Lee; Jen-Pin Chuang; Jenq-Chang Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative localization of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sergio A Acuna; Maryam Elmi; Prakesh S Shah; Natalie G Coburn; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The role of multidetector CT in local staging and evaluation of retroperitoneal surgical margin involvement in colon cancer.

Authors:  Funda Dinç Elibol; Funda Obuz; Selman Sökmen; Cem Terzi; Aras Emre Canda; Özgül Sağol; Sülen Sarıoğlu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Pre-colectomy location and TNM staging of colon cancer by the computed tomography colonography: a diagnostic performance study.

Authors:  Yadong Zhou; Zhiwei Han; Fafu Dou; Tao Yan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.754

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.