G Böhm1, T Mang, M Gschwendtner. 1. Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Krankenhaus Elisabethinen Linz, Fadingerstr. 1, A-4010, Linz, Österreich.
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Colorectal cancer is a major public health challenge in Austria and Germany. As the participation in dedicated colonoscopy screening programs is rather low, the question of alternative methods is raised again and computed tomography (CT) colonography seems to be a gentle alternative with a very high patient acceptance. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: In recent years CT colonography (CTC) has been established besides conventional colonoscopy as a radiological method for the investigation of the entire colon. From axial two-dimensional images three-dimensional images can be generated, allowing a virtual flight through the colon which is why this technique is also known as virtual colonoscopy. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: The technique of CTC has been improved continuously during recent years. On the one hand the steady decrease in the layer thickness (currently ≤ 1 mm) has improved the resolution of volume data sets and on the other hand there has been significant progress in postprocessing. PERFORMANCE: Numerous studies have recently shown that the significance of CTC in the detection of advanced adenomas is similar to conventional colonoscopy. ACHIEVEMENTS: Meanwhile CT colonography is now a routine investigation method established in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (screening). PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Study data now clearly show that CTC, as an alternative to conventional colonoscopy, is a powerful method for investigation of colorectal cancer. To achieve good results adequate preparation including fecal tagging, standardized technical procedures during the investigation and expertise in both 2D and 3D reading are essential.
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Colorectal cancer is a major public health challenge in Austria and Germany. As the participation in dedicated colonoscopy screening programs is rather low, the question of alternative methods is raised again and computed tomography (CT) colonography seems to be a gentle alternative with a very high patient acceptance. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: In recent years CT colonography (CTC) has been established besides conventional colonoscopy as a radiological method for the investigation of the entire colon. From axial two-dimensional images three-dimensional images can be generated, allowing a virtual flight through the colon which is why this technique is also known as virtual colonoscopy. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: The technique of CTC has been improved continuously during recent years. On the one hand the steady decrease in the layer thickness (currently ≤ 1 mm) has improved the resolution of volume data sets and on the other hand there has been significant progress in postprocessing. PERFORMANCE: Numerous studies have recently shown that the significance of CTC in the detection of advanced adenomas is similar to conventional colonoscopy. ACHIEVEMENTS: Meanwhile CT colonography is now a routine investigation method established in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (screening). PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Study data now clearly show that CTC, as an alternative to conventional colonoscopy, is a powerful method for investigation of colorectal cancer. To achieve good results adequate preparation including fecal tagging, standardized technical procedures during the investigation and expertise in both 2D and 3D reading are essential.
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; James A Butler; Michael L Puckett; Hans A Hildebrandt; Roy K Wong; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; William R Schindler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amy Berrington de González; Kwang Pyo Kim; Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Judy Yee; Karen M Kuntz; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Christine D Berg Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael E Zalis; Matthew A Barish; J Richard Choi; Abraham H Dachman; Helen M Fenlon; Joseph T Ferrucci; Seth N Glick; Andrea Laghi; Michael Macari; Elizabeth G McFarland; Martina M Morrin; Perry J Pickhardt; Jorge Soto; Judy Yee Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: C Daniel Johnson; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Alicia Y Toledano; Jay P Heiken; Abraham Dachman; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy K Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Benjamin A Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Paul J Limburg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Laurian Copel; Jacob Sosna; Jonathan B Kruskal; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Richard J Farrell; Martina M Morrin Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-12-30 Impact factor: 91.245