Literature DB >> 31229791

Impact of PET/CT for Restaging Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Eric Sorenson1, Fernando Lambreton1, Jian Q Yu2, Tianyu Li3, Crystal S Denlinger4, Joshua E Meyer5, Elin R Sigurdson1, Jeffrey M Farma6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A major challenge in identifying candidates for nonoperative management of locally advanced rectal cancer is predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) following chemoradiation. We evaluated pre- and post-CRT PET-CT imaging to predict pCR and prognosis in this set of patients undergoing resection after neoadjuvant therapy.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients from 2002 to 2015 with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent CRT, pre- and post-CRT PET-CT imaging, and resection. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the association of PET-CT characteristics with pCR and survival. ROC curves were generated to define optimal cutoff points for predictive PET-CT characteristics.
RESULTS: 125 patients were included. pCR rate was 28%, and follow-up was 48 mo. On multivariable analysis, patients who had a pCR had lower median post-CRT maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (3.2 versus 5.2, P = 0.009) and higher median %SUV decrease (72 versus 58%, P = 0.009). ROC curves were generated for %SUVmax decrease (AUC = 0.70) and post-CRT SUV (AUC = 0.69). Post-CRT SUVmax <4.3 and %SUVmax decrease of >66% were equally predictive of pCR with a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 72%, PPV of 44%, and NPV of 86%. Median 5-y overall and relapse-free survival were improved for patients with post-CRT SUV <4.3 (OS: 86 versus 66%, P = 0.01; RFS: 75 versus 52%, P = 0.01) or %SUV decrease of >66% (OS, 82 versus 66%, P = 0.05; RFS, 75 versus 54%, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT may be useful in identifying patients who did not achieve pCR, as well as overall survival in patients undergoing CRT for rectal cancer. Patients with a post-CRT SUV of >4.3 should be considered for operative management, as an estimated 86% of these patients will not have a pCR.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete pathologic response; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation; PET/CT; Rectal Cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31229791      PMCID: PMC7751164          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  30 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation by whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with primary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Mukai; S Sadahiro; S Yasuda; H Ishida; N Tokunaga; T Tajima; H Makuuchi
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Predicting complete response to neoadjuvant CRT for distal rectal cancer using sequential PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  R O Perez; A Habr-Gama; G P São Julião; P B Lynn; C Sabbagh; I Proscurshim; F G Campos; J Gama-Rodrigues; S C Nahas; C A Buchpiguel
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Systematic review of FDG-PET prediction of complete pathological response and survival in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sameer Memon; A Craig Lynch; Timothy Akhurst; Samuel Y Ngan; Satish K Warrier; Michael Michael; Alexander G Heriot
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer using 18FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Skandan Shanmugan; Rodrigo Arrangoiz; James R Nitzkorski; Jian Q Yu; Tianyu Li; Harry Cooper; Andre Konski; Jeffrey M Farma; Elin R Sigurdson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Development and external validation of a predictive model for pathological complete response of rectal cancer patients including sequential PET-CT imaging.

Authors:  Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Guido Lammering; Jeroen Buijsen; Marco H M Janssen; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Pieter Slagmolen; Maarten Lambrecht; Domenico Rubello; Marcello Gava; Alessandro Giordano; Eric O Postma; Karin Haustermans; Carlo Capirci; Vincenzo Valentini; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Value of FDG PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in Initial Staging of Colorectal Cancer - Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT.

Authors:  Anchisa Kunawudhi; Karun Sereeborwornthanasak; Chetsadaporn Promteangtrong; Bunchorn Siripongpreeda; Saiphet Vanprom; Chanisa Chotipanich
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016

7.  FDG PET/CT radiomics for predicting the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pierre Lovinfosse; Marc Polus; Daniel Van Daele; Philippe Martinive; Frédéric Daenen; Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Benjamin Koopmansch; Frédéric Lambert; Carla Coimbra; Laurence Seidel; Adelin Albert; Philippe Delvenne; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Wladimir Nadalin; Jorge Sabbaga; Ulysses Ribeiro; Afonso Henrique Silva e Sousa; Fábio Guilherme Campos; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  18F-FDG positron emission tomography staging and restaging in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Felipe A Calvo; Marta Domper; Raúl Matute; Raúl Martínez-Lázaro; José A Arranz; Manuel Desco; Emilio Alvarez; José Luis Carreras
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues; Guilherme P São Julião; Igor Proscurshim; Charles Sabbagh; Patricio B Lynn; Rodrigo O Perez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy: how certain is radiology?]

Authors:  Hanna Kuzior; Michel Eisenblätter
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  T2-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient and 18F-FDG PET histogram analysis of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  F Crimì; R Stramare; G Spolverato; V Aldegheri; A Barison; L D'Alimonte; Q R Bao; A Spimpolo; L Albertoni; D Cecchin; C Campi; E Quaia; S Pucciarelli; P Zucchetta
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Assessment of clinical and pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal adenocarcinoma and its therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sorin Tiberiu Alexandrescu; Adrian Vasile Dumitru; Ruxandra Doina Babiuc; Radu Virgil Costea
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Magnetic Resonance Guided Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: Expanding Opportunities for Non-Operative Management.

Authors:  Leila T Tchelebi; Paul B Romesser; Sebastian Feuerlein; Sarah Hoffe; Kujtim Latifi; Seth Felder; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.