| Literature DB >> 26101470 |
Abstract
Fish and marine mammal consumption are an important pathway for human exposure to mercury. The low mercury content in shellfish poses a low mercury health risk to people who consume shellfish. The objectives of this study are to detect mercury concentrations in different species of shellfish and to calculate the mercury health risk from shellfish consumption among traditional residents near northern Jiaozhou Bay. A total of 356 shellfish samples, which comprised 7 species from 5 different places in northern Jiaozhou Bay, were collected from April to June in 2012. The average mercury content in the collected shellfish ranged from 0.024 mg·kg(-1) to 0.452 mg·kg(-1). A total of 44 shellfish samples (12.36%) had mercury levels exceeding the national pollution-free aquatic products limit (0.3 mg·kg(-1)). Generally, the viscus had the highest mercury content among all parts of the shellfish. A positive correlation between mercury content and total weight/edible part weight was found in most species of the collected shellfish. The results showed that shellfish consumption resulted in the lower risk of mercury exposure to residents based on the calculation of daily intake (DI) and target hazard quotient (THQ).Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26101470 PMCID: PMC4458521 DOI: 10.1155/2015/159521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Figure 1The spatial location for shellfish sampling in Jiaozhou Bay.
Hg contents in the different species of shellfish samples (wet weight, mg·kg−1).
| Species | Number | Range | Average | Geometric mean | S.D. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 31 | 0.147–1.072 | 0.452a | 0.381 | 0.280 |
|
| 38 | 0.003–1.096 | 0.250b | 0.104 | 0.186 |
|
| 21 | 0.085–0.477 | 0.243b | 0.208 | 0.134 |
|
| 47 | 0.023–0.256 | 0.095c | 0.073 | 0.068 |
|
| 36 | 0.033–0.171 | 0.080c | 0.068 | 0.048 |
|
| 27 | 0.006–0.201 | 0.073c | 0.054 | 0.053 |
|
| 156 | 0.001–0.094 | 0.024cd | 0.016 | 0.015 |
Notes: there is no significant difference between those containing same letters, and there is significant difference between those containing different letters, with α = 0.05.
The distribution of Hg in the different parts of shellfish samples (wet weight, mg·kg−1).
| Species | Name of part | Average | Range | S.D. | Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Viscus | 0.839a | 0.523–1.072 | 0.177 | 31 |
| Edible part | 0.526b | 0.174–0.871 | 0.273 | 31 | |
| Mantle | 0.296bc | 0.155–0.612 | 0.171 | 31 | |
| Foot | 0.156bc | 0.147–0.171 | 0.008 | 31 | |
|
| |||||
|
| Edible part | 0.096a | 0.037–0.256 | 0.067 | 47 |
| mantle | 0.047a | 0.023–0.124 | 0.035 | 47 | |
|
| |||||
|
| Viscus | 0.251a | 0.011–1.096 | 0.233 | 38 |
| Edible part | 0.231a | 0.003–0.947 | 0.219 | 38 | |
|
| |||||
|
| Viscus | 0.250a | 0.091–0.477 | 0.028 | 21 |
| Edible part | 0.121b | 0.085–0.398 | 0.097 | 21 | |
Notes: there is no significant difference between those containing same letters, and there is significant difference between those containing different letters, with α = 0.05.
Correlation between Hg content in different types of shellfish and their total weight/edible part weight.
| Species | Correlation coefficient ( | Equation | Pearson coefficient ( | Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.252 |
| 0.027 | 156 |
|
| 0.323 |
| 0.004 | 156 |
|
| 0.452 |
| 0.141 | 31 |
|
| 0.386 |
| 0.215 | 31 |
|
| 0.480 |
| 0.161 | 36 |
|
| 0.294 |
| 0.409 | 36 |
|
| 0.938 |
| 0.000 | 21 |
|
| 0.948 |
| 0.000 | 21 |
|
| 0.908 |
| 0.000 | 38 |
|
| 0.925 |
| 0.000 | 38 |
|
| 0.381 |
| 0.073 | 47 |
|
| 0.378 |
| 0.076 | 47 |
|
| 0.671 |
| 0.024 | 27 |
|
| 0.693 |
| 0.018 | 27 |
Remarkably significant correlation; significant correlation.
Hg intake to residents of different age groups near northern Jiaozhou Bay by shellfish consumption values (μg·d−1).
| Species | The daily Hg intake through shellfish consumption for residents of different age | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults | Teenagers | Children | ||||
| Average | Range | Average | Range | Average | Range | |
|
| 1.200 | 0.050–47 | 0.554 | 0.023–21.705 | 0.602 | 0.025–23.594 |
|
| 22.600 | 7.350–53.600 | 10.440 | 3.394–24.752 | 11.345 | 3.690–26.907 |
|
| 4.000 | 1.650–8.550 | 1.847 | 0.762–3.948 | 2.008 | 0.828–4.292 |
|
| 7.314 | 2.559–14.358 | 3.378 | 1.182–6.630 | 3.742 | 1.309–7.346 |
|
| 7.525 | 0.090–32.990 | 3.475 | 0.042–15.234 | 3.850 | 0.046–16.878 |
|
| 4.750 | 1.155–12.800 | 2.194 | 0.531–5.911 | 2.385 | 0.577–6.426 |
|
| 2.197 | 0.181–6.050 | 1.015 | 0.083–2.794 | 1.124 | 0.092–3.095 |
THQ of Hg in the different species of shellfish from northern Jiaozhou Bay.
| Species | THQ through shellfish consumption for residents of different age | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults | Teenagers | Children | ||||
| Average | Range | Average | Range | Average | Range | |
|
| 0.028 | 0.001–1.097 | 0.013 | 0.001–0.507 | 0.026 | 0.001–1.010 |
|
| 0.527 | 0.172–1.251 | 0.244 | 0.079–0.572 | 0.486 | 0.158–1.152 |
|
| 0.093 | 0.039–0.199 | 0.043 | 0.018–0.092 | 0.086 | 0.036–0.184 |
|
| 0.170 | 0.060–0.334 | 0.079 | 0.028–0.155 | 0.160 | 0.056–0.315 |
|
| 0.176 | 0.002–0.770 | 0.081 | 0.001–0.356 | 0.165 | 0.002–0.723 |
|
| 0.111 | 0.027–0.299 | 0.051 | 0.012–0.138 | 0.102 | 0.025–0.275 |
|
| 0.051 | 0.005–0.010 | 0.024 | 0.002–0.065 | 0.048 | 0.004–0.133 |