Literature DB >> 21176919

Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Tao Cheng1, Guoyou Zhang, Xianlong Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of computer-assisted surgery is to improve accuracy and limit the range of surgical variability. However, a worldwide debate exists regarding the importance and usefulness of computer-assisted navigation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The main purpose of this study is to summarize and compare the radiographic outcomes of TKA performed using imageless computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases was made, in addition to manual search of major orthopedic journals. A meta-analysis of 29 quasi-randomized/randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs/RCTs) and 11 prospective comparative studies was conducted through a random effects model. Additional a priori sources of clinical heterogeneity were evaluated by subgroup analysis with regard to radiographic methods.
RESULTS: When the outlier cut-off value of lower limb axis was defined as ±2° or ±3° from the neutral, the postoperative full-length radiographs demonstrated that the risk ratio was 0.54 or 0.39, respectively, which were in favor of the navigated group. When the cut-off value used for the alignment in the coronal and sagittal plane was 2° or 3°, imageless navigation significantly reduced the outlier rate of the femoral and tibial components compared with the conventional group. Notably, computed tomography scans demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the outliers in the rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components; however, there was strong statistical heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that imageless computer-assisted navigation systems improve lower limb axis and component orientation in the coronal and sagittal planes, but not the rotational alignment in TKA. Further multiple-center clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed to determine differences in the clinical and functional outcomes of knee arthroplasties performed using computer-assisted techniques.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21176919     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  22 in total

1.  Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique.

Authors:  Kilian Reising; Peter C Strohm; Oliver Hauschild; Hagen Schmal; Mohmed Khattab; Norbert P Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Alfonso Noriega-Fernandez; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Carreira; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Simon; Jimena Llorens de los Rios
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Inter-observer precision and physiologic variability of mri landmarks used to determine rotational alignment in conventional and patient-specific TKA.

Authors:  Andrew Park; Denis Nam; Michael V Friedman; Stephen T Duncan; Travis J Hillen; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Differences in component and limb alignment between computer-assisted and conventional surgery total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Kuo-Ti Peng; Kuo-Chin Huang; Mel S Lee; Robert Wen-Wei Hsu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparison of ultra-congruent mobile- and fixed-bearing navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Jung-Won Lim; Young-Bong Ko; Min-Gu Song; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  How to improve femoral component rotational alignment in computer-assisted TKA.

Authors:  F Zambianchi; T Luyckx; J Victor; V Digennaro; A Giorgini; F Catani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Less outliers in pinless navigation compared with conventional surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Pak Lin Chin; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  [Total knee arthroplasty with the use of patient specific instruments. The VISIONAIRE system].

Authors:  C O Tibesku
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.