Literature DB >> 21171029

Assessment of barriers to changing practice as CME outcomes.

David W Price1, Elaine K Miller, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Nancy E Brace, R Sam Larson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Continuing medical education (CME) is meant to drive and support improvements in practice. To achieve this goal, CME activities must move beyond simply purveying knowledge, instead helping attendees to contextualize information and to develop strategies for implementing new learning. CME attendees face different barriers to implementing learning, depending on both personal and practice specific contexts. We sought to develop a framework, applicable across multiple CME activities, for categorizing barriers that learners anticipated encountering after CME activities.
METHODS: Building on previous work, qualitative research methods were used to develop an enhanced framework classifying attendee-perceived barriers to implementing CME learnings in practice. Three thousand one hundred thirty (3130) narrative responses on attendee-perceived barriers to implementing learnings were collected from 75 Kaiser Permanente Colorado live CME activities for family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric, and OB/GYN clinicians in 2008 and 2009.
RESULTS: Our CME Learning Transfer Barrier Framework contains 27 discrete barriers in 12 barrier categories (including "none"). The barrier framework was applicable across two years of live CME activities for different clinician target audiences. DISCUSSION: Assessing, characterizing, and summarizing barriers to implementing learning during CME activities can provide valuable information to inform subsequent CME interventions, and provide feedback to organizational leaders to inform performance improvement efforts. The framework may be applicable to other CME formats and to CME activities for audiences in different practice settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21171029     DOI: 10.1002/chp.20088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

Review 1.  Building capacity for dementia care: training program to develop primary care memory clinics.

Authors:  Linda Lee; M Janet Kasperski; W Wayne Weston
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Prosthetists' perceptions and use of outcome measures in clinical practice: Long-term effects of focused continuing education.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Susan E Spaulding; Rana Salem; Sara J Morgan; Ignacio Gaunaurd; Robert Gailey
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  An evaluation of the translation of continuing education into diabetes public health care by pharmacists.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur; Sara Shabana; Fatima Maraghi; Alaa ElMubark; Nadir Kheir
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-05-12

4.  Implementing an evidence-based breast cancer support and communication tool to newly diagnosed patients as standard care in two institutions.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Robert P Hawkins; James W Dearing; Suzanne Pingree; Jana Bolduan Lomax; Helen McDowell; Erica Ferro Morse; BreAnne Barela
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  "Systems-Integrated CME": The Implementation and Outcomes Imperative for Continuing Medical Education in the Learning Health Care Enterprise.

Authors:  David W Price; David A Davis; Gary L Filerman
Journal:  NAM Perspect       Date:  2021-10-04

6.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing a continuing medical education intervention in a primary health care setting.

Authors:  Teresa Reis; Inês Faria; Helena Serra; Miguel Xavier
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  A Systematic Review of Global Health Assessment for Education in Healthcare Professions.

Authors:  Connor Sharon E; Jonkman Lauren J; Covvey Jordan R; Kahaleh Abby A; Park Sharon K; Ryan Melody; Klein-Fedyshin Michele; Golchin Negar; Veillard Regine Beliard
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.640

Review 8.  Geriatric Educational Interventions for Physicians Training in Non-Geriatric Specialties: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  En Ye Ong; Kelly J Bower; Louisa Ng
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 9.  What are the implications of implementation science for medical education?

Authors:  David W Price; Dianne P Wagner; N Kevin Krane; Steven C Rougas; Nancy R Lowitt; Regina S Offodile; L Jane Easdown; Mark A W Andrews; Charles M Kodner; Monica Lypson; Barbara E Barnes
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-04-23

Review 10.  The transformation of continuing medical education (CME) in the United States.

Authors:  Jann Torrance Balmer
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2013-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.