Literature DB >> 21170153

Finite Normal Mixture SEM Analysis by Fitting Multiple Conventional SEM Models.

Ke-Hai Yuan1, Peter M Bentler.   

Abstract

This paper proposes a two-stage maximum likelihood (ML) approach to normal mixture structural equation modeling (SEM), and develops statistical inference that allows distributional misspecification. Saturated means and covariances are estimated at stage-1 together with a sandwich-type covariance matrix. These are used to evaluate structural models at stage-2. Techniques accumulated in the conventional SEM literature for model diagnosis and evaluation can be used to study the model structure for each component. Examples show that the two-stage ML approach leads to correct or nearly correct models even when the normal mixture assumptions are violated and initial models are misspecified. Compared to single-stage ML, two-stage ML avoids the confounding effect of model specification and the number of components, and is computationally more efficient. Monte-Carlo results indicate that two-stage ML loses only minimal efficiency under the condition where single-stage ML performs best. Monte-Carlo results also indicate that the commonly used model selection criterion BIC is more robust to distribution violations for the saturated model than that for a structural model at moderate sample sizes. The proposed two-stage ML approach is also extremely flexible in modeling different components with different models. Potential new developments in the mixture modeling literature can be easily adapted to study issues with normal mixture SEM.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21170153      PMCID: PMC3002113          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01224.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methodol        ISSN: 0081-1750


  11 in total

1.  Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm.

Authors:  B Muthén; K Shedden
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions.

Authors:  Bengt Muthén; C Hendricks Brown; Katherine Masyn; Booil Jo; Siek-Toon Khoo; Chih-Chien Yang; Chen-Pin Wang; Sheppard G Kellam; John B Carlin; Jason Liao
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes.

Authors:  Daniel J Bauer; Patrick J Curran
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-09

4.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?

Authors:  L T Hu; P M Bentler; Y Kano
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities.

Authors:  Daniel J Bauer; Patrick J Curran
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-03

6.  Distinguishing Between Latent Classes and Continuous Factors: Resolution by Maximum Likelihood?

Authors:  Gitta Lubke; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Structural Equation Modeling with Small Samples: Test Statistics.

Authors:  P M Bentler; K H Yuan
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance.

Authors:  R C MacCallum; M Roznowski; L B Necowitz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Two simple approximations to the distributions of quadratic forms.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.380

View more
  6 in total

1.  Moderation analysis using a two-level regression model.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Ying Cheng; Scott Maxwell
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  On Components, Latent Variables, PLS and Simple Methods: Reactions to Rigdon's Rethinking of PLS.

Authors:  Peter M Bentler; Wenjing Huang
Journal:  Long Range Plann       Date:  2014-06-01

3.  Temporal Stability of Heavy Drinking Days and Drinking Reductions Among Heavy Drinkers in the COMBINE Study.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Adam D Wilson; Matthew R Pearson; Kevin A Hallgren; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Henry R Kranzler; Karl F Mann; Deborah S Hasin; Stephanie S O'Malley; Raymond F Anton
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Broad Coping Repertoire Mediates the Effect of the Combined Behavioral Intervention on Alcohol Outcomes in the COMBINE Study: An Application of Latent Class Mediation.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Corey R Roos; Davood Tofighi; M Lee Van Horn
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  Maintenance of World Health Organization Risk Drinking Level Reductions and Posttreatment Functioning Following a Large Alcohol Use Disorder Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Deborah S Hasin; Henry R Kranzler; Karl F Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Raymond F Anton
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.928

6.  Stability of Drinking Reductions and Long-term Functioning Among Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Kevin A Hallgren; Deborah S Hasin; Arnie P Aldridge; Gary A Zarkin; Karl F Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Raymond F Anton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.