| Literature DB >> 21169687 |
Roger Fourme1, Eric Girard, Anne Claire Dhaussy, Kadda Medjoubi, Thierry Prangé, Isabella Ascone, Mohamed Mezouar, Richard Kahn.
Abstract
Biological structures can now be investigated at high resolution by high-pressure X-ray macromolecular crystallography (HPMX). The number of HPMX studies is growing, with applications to polynucleotides, monomeric and multimeric proteins, complex assemblies and even a virus capsid. Investigations of the effects of pressure perturbation have encompassed elastic compression of the native state, study of proteins from extremophiles and trapping of higher-energy conformers that are often of biological interest; measurements of the compressibility of crystals and macromolecules were also performed. HPMX results were an incentive to investigate short and ultra-short wavelengths for standard biocrystallography. On cryocooled lysozyme crystals it was found that the data collection efficiency using 33 keV photons is increased with respect to 18 keV photons. This conclusion was extended from 33 keV down to 6.5 keV by exploiting previously published data. To be fully exploited, the potential of higher-energy photons requires detectors with a good efficiency. Accordingly, a new paradigm for MX beamlines was suggested, using conventional short and ultra-short wavelengths, aiming at the collection of very high accuracy data on crystals under standard conditions or under high pressure. The main elements of such beamlines are outlined.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21169687 PMCID: PMC3004250 DOI: 10.1107/S0909049510041695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Synchrotron Radiat ISSN: 0909-0495 Impact factor: 2.616
Figure 1Selected examples of macromolecular structures investigated by HPMX (from works by authors of this article and co-workers).
Results of HPMX studies where data collection at one or several pressures was completed
N = number of crystals. Res = resolution. Compl = completeness. Red = redundancy. PDB = Protein Data Bank. IP = imaging plate.
| System | Space group | Cell parameters | λ (Å)/detector | Res | Compl (%) | Red | Reference | PDB ID | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEWL | 77.54, 77.54, 38.05 | 0.331/IP | 0.30 | 1 | 1.98 | 4.8 | 19.1 | 79.5 | 4.2 | 18.8 | 22.0 | Fourme | ||
| 76.77, 76.77, 37.80 | 0.331/IP | 0.58 | 1 | 1.99 | 5.2 | 20.7 | 84.3 | 4.8 | 20.8 | 24.5 | Fourme | |||
| 76.58, 76.58, 37.55 | 0.331/IP | 0.69 | 2 | 1.81 | 7.6 | 21.4 | 70.6 | 3.9 | 22.8 | 26.1 | Fourme | |||
| UOX | 79.70, 95.87, 104.99 | 0.374/CCD | 0.15 | 1 | 1.8 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 96.4 | 2.7 | 17.8 | 21.8 | Girard | 3f2m | |
| SOD | 46.85, 50.51, 146.38 | 0.331/IP | 0.57 | 2 | 2.0 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 91.0 | 5.8 | 17.2 | 21.8 | Ascone | 3hw7 | |
| CpMV | 313.38, 313.38, 313.38 | 0.331/IP | 0.33 | 8 | 2.8 | 14.9 | 4.9 | 91.2 | 3.4 | 16.3 | 17.1 | Girard | ||
| Cellulase | 44.66, 78.87, 136.10 | 0.331/IP | 1.75 | 2 | 1.80 | – | – | – | – | – | – | Refinement in progress | ||
| A-DNA | 43.71, 43.71, 40.70 | 0.374/CCD | 0.55 | 1 | 1.65 | 4.3 | 10.2 | 94.1 | 3.2 | 16.9 | 20.1 | Girard | 2pl4 | |
| 43.17, 43.17, 40.38 | 0.374/CCD | 1.04 | 1 | 1.60 | 5.8 | 6.6 | 89.4 | 3.2 | 18.9 | 22.1 | Girard | 2pl8 | ||
| 42.83, 42.83, 40.30 | 0.374/CCD | 1.39 | 1 | 1.60 | 4.7 | 11.4 | 98.5 | 3.1 | 18.7 | 22.2 | Girard | 2plb | ||
| B-DNA | 25.23, 40.66, 65.20 | 0.374/CCD | 0.35 | 2 | 2.55 | 11.5 | 8.1 | 78.5 | 3.2 | 20.5 | 27.1 | Refinement in progress | ||
| Z-DNA | 17.77, 30.86, 43.45 | 0.8/CCD | 0.72 | 3 | 1.55 | – | – | – | – | – | – | Data collected | ||
| eGFP | 37.72, 130.37, 110.60 | 0.374/CCD | 7.85 | 2 | 1.9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | Data at four pressures, refinement in progress |
Structure refinements by T. Prangé (private communication).
Figure 2Variation of the average B factor as a function of data set number during multiple data acquisition with 18 keV photons and a CCD detector.
Figure 3Intrinsic ΔB/B variation as a function of data set number during repeated acquisitions on a cryocooled HEWL crystal at 18 and 33 keV. The first data set is labelled 0 and the 18 keV plot is limited to the first 16 data sets of the complete collection shown in Fig. 2 ▶.
Figure 4Variation of ΔB/B per data set versus energy during repeated data acquisitions on a cryocooled HEWL crystal performed at nine photon energies from 6.5 to 33 keV with a CCD detector. Analysis is based on Table 1 of Shimizu et al. (2007 ▶), after rescaling assuming DQE = 1 over the whole energy range.