Literature DB >> 21169575

Monetary reward increases attentional effort in the flanker task.

Ronald Hübner1, Jan Schlösser.   

Abstract

An important question is whether monetary reward can increase attentional effort in order to improve performance. Up to now, evidence for a positive answer is weak. Therefore, in the present study, the flanker task was used to examine this question further. Participants had to respond sooner than a certain deadline in a flanker task. One group of participants received a performance-contingent monetary reward, whereas the other group earned a fixed amount of money. As a result, monetary reward significantly improved performance in comparison with the control group. The analysis of speed-accuracy trade-off functions revealed that monetary reward increased attentional effort, leading to an enhanced quality of stimulus coding. Little evidence was found that reward also improved selective spatial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21169575     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Serena J Butcher; Carol Lee; Megan Hyle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

3.  Medial frontal cortex activity and loss-related responses to errors.

Authors:  Stephan F Taylor; Brian Martis; Kate D Fitzgerald; Robert C Welsh; James L Abelson; Israel Liberzon; Joseph A Himle; William J Gehring
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  More attention must be paid: the neurobiology of attentional effort.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; William J Gehring; Rouba Kozak
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2006-03-13

5.  Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05-05

6.  Choking on the money: reward-based performance decrements are associated with midbrain activity.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Demis Hassabis; Ben Seymour; Jennifer L Marchant; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Raymond J Dolan; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-07-06

7.  Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  Jan B Engelmann; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2007-08

8.  Combined effects of attention and motivation on visual task performance: transient and sustained motivational effects.

Authors:  Jan B Engelmann; Eswar Damaraju; Srikanth Padmala; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Basal forebrain activation enhances cortical coding of natural scenes.

Authors:  Michael Goard; Yang Dan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Jon Driver; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-01-23
View more
  24 in total

1.  The time course of cognitive control implementation.

Authors:  Clio Janssens; Esther De Loof; Gilles Pourtois; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  Reward-prospect interacts with trial-by-trial preparation for potential distraction.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Berry van den Berg; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-02-01

3.  Local and global effects of motivation on cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam C Savine; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-02

5.  Transient and sustained incentive effects on electrophysiological indices of cognitive control in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Ryan S Williams; Farrah Kudus; Benjamin J Dyson; Julia Spaniol
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  Mechanisms of motivation-cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Todd S Braver; Marie K Krug; Kimberly S Chiew; Wouter Kool; J Andrew Westbrook; Nathan J Clement; R Alison Adcock; Deanna M Barch; Matthew M Botvinick; Charles S Carver; Roshan Cools; Ruud Custers; Anthony Dickinson; Carol S Dweck; Ayelet Fishbach; Peter M Gollwitzer; Thomas M Hess; Derek M Isaacowitz; Mara Mather; Kou Murayama; Luiz Pessoa; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Leah H Somerville
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Effects of average reward rate on vigor as a function of individual variation in striatal dopamine.

Authors:  Lieke Hofmans; Andrew Westbrook; Ruben van den Bosch; Jan Booij; Robbert-Jan Verkes; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Motivation versus aversive processing during perception.

Authors:  Srikanth Padmala; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-04-07

9.  Promising high monetary rewards for future task performance increases intermediate task performance.

Authors:  Claire M Zedelius; Harm Veling; Erik Bijleveld; Henk Aarts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Motivational salience and genetic variability of dopamine D2 receptor expression interact in the modulation of interference processing.

Authors:  Anni Richter; Sylvia Richter; Adriana Barman; Joram Soch; Marieke Klein; Anne Assmann; Catherine Libeau; Gusalija Behnisch; Torsten Wüstenberg; Constanze I Seidenbecher; Björn H Schott
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.