Literature DB >> 21167714

A high proliferation rate is required for cell reprogramming and maintenance of human embryonic stem cell identity.

Sergio Ruiz1, Athanasia D Panopoulos, Aída Herrerías, Karl-Dimiter Bissig, Margaret Lutz, W Travis Berggren, Inder M Verma, Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte.   

Abstract

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells show an atypical cell-cycle regulation characterized by a high proliferation rate and a short G1 phase. In fact, a shortened G1 phase might protect ES cells from external signals inducing differentiation, as shown for certain stem cells. It has been suggested that self-renewal and pluripotency are intimately linked to cell-cycle regulation in ES cells, although little is known about the overall importance of the cell-cycle machinery in maintaining ES cell identity. An appealing model to address whether the acquisition of stem cell properties is linked to cell-cycle regulation emerged with the ability to generate induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by expression of defined transcription factors. Here, we show that the characteristic cell-cycle signature of hES cells is acquired as an early event in cell reprogramming. We demonstrate that induction of cell proliferation increases reprogramming efficiency, whereas cell-cycle arrest inhibits successful reprogramming. Furthermore, we show that cell-cycle arrest is sufficient to drive hES cells toward irreversible differentiation. Our results establish a link that intertwines the mechanisms of cell-cycle control with the mechanisms underlying the acquisition and maintenance of ES cell identity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21167714      PMCID: PMC3034649          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  29 in total

1.  An inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases that lengthens, but does not arrest, neuroepithelial cell cycle induces premature neurogenesis.

Authors:  Federico Calegari; Wieland B Huttner
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity.

Authors:  Rosa M Marión; Katerina Strati; Han Li; Matilde Murga; Raquel Blanco; Sagrario Ortega; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Manuel Serrano; Maria A Blasco
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control.

Authors:  R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway.

Authors:  Hyenjong Hong; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Tomoko Ichisaka; Takashi Aoi; Osami Kanagawa; Masato Nakagawa; Keisuke Okita; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Homologous recombination in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Thomas P Zwaka; James A Thomson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  p21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities.

Authors:  Tarek Abbas; Anindya Dutta
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Linking the p53 tumour suppressor pathway to somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Teruhisa Kawamura; Jotaro Suzuki; Yunyuan V Wang; Sergio Menendez; Laura Batlle Morera; Angel Raya; Geoffrey M Wahl; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Senescence impairs successful reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Ana Banito; Sheikh T Rashid; Juan Carlos Acosta; SiDe Li; Carlos F Pereira; Imbisaat Geti; Sandra Pinho; Jose C Silva; Veronique Azuara; Martin Walsh; Ludovic Vallier; Jesús Gil
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Cdk4/cyclinD1 overexpression in neural stem cells shortens G1, delays neurogenesis, and promotes the generation and expansion of basal progenitors.

Authors:  Christian Lange; Wieland B Huttner; Federico Calegari
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  Bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemical determination of the lengths of the cell cycle and the DNA-synthetic phase for an anatomically defined population.

Authors:  R S Nowakowski; S B Lewin; M W Miller
Journal:  J Neurocytol       Date:  1989-06
View more
  143 in total

1.  Sequential introduction of reprogramming factors reveals a time-sensitive requirement for individual factors and a sequential EMT-MET mechanism for optimal reprogramming.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Liu; Hao Sun; Jing Qi; Linli Wang; Songwei He; Jing Liu; Chengqian Feng; Chunlan Chen; Wen Li; Yunqian Guo; Dajiang Qin; Guangjin Pan; Jiekai Chen; Duanqing Pei; Hui Zheng
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Generation of a drug-inducible reporter system to study cell reprogramming in human cells.

Authors:  Sergio Ruiz; Athanasia D Panopoulos; Nuria Montserrat; Marie-Christine Multon; Aurélie Daury; Corinne Rocher; Emmanuel Spanakis; Erika M Batchelder; Cécile Orsini; Jean-François Deleuze; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  G1 cyclins link proliferation, pluripotency and differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Lijun Liu; Wojciech Michowski; Hiroyuki Inuzuka; Kouhei Shimizu; Naoe Taira Nihira; Joel M Chick; Na Li; Yan Geng; Alice Y Meng; Alban Ordureau; Aleksandra Kołodziejczyk; Keith L Ligon; Roderick T Bronson; Kornelia Polyak; J Wade Harper; Steven P Gygi; Wenyi Wei; Piotr Sicinski
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Cultured Cells from the Human Oocyte Cumulus Niche Are Efficient Feeders to Propagate Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Said Assou; Emilie Pourret; Marie Péquignot; Valérie Rigau; Vasiliki Kalatzis; Ounissa Aït-Ahmed; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  Pluripotency of male germline stem cells.

Authors:  Sungtae Kim; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.034

Review 6.  Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state.

Authors:  Kathrin Plath; William E Lowry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  cAMP and EPAC Signaling Functionally Replace OCT4 During Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Reprogramming.

Authors:  Ashley L Fritz; Maroof M Adil; Sunnie R Mao; David V Schaffer
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 8.  Cycling through developmental decisions: how cell cycle dynamics control pluripotency, differentiation and reprogramming.

Authors:  Abdenour Soufi; Stephen Dalton
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  ATG3-dependent autophagy mediates mitochondrial homeostasis in pluripotency acquirement and maintenance.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Qian Zhao; Pinglei Liu; Jiani Cao; Jiaqi Gong; Chaoqun Wang; Weixu Wang; Xiaoyan Li; Hongyan Sun; Chao Zhang; Yufei Li; Minggui Jiang; Shaohua Zhu; Qingyuan Sun; Jianwei Jiao; Baoyang Hu; Xiaoyang Zhao; Wei Li; Quan Chen; Qi Zhou; Tongbiao Zhao
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 16.016

10.  Cdk1 Controls Global Epigenetic Landscape in Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Wojciech Michowski; Joel M Chick; Chen Chu; Aleksandra Kolodziejczyk; Yichen Wang; Jan M Suski; Brian Abraham; Lars Anders; Daniel Day; Lukas M Dunkl; Mitchell Li Cheong Man; Tian Zhang; Phatthamon Laphanuwat; Nickolas A Bacon; Lijun Liu; Anne Fassl; Samanta Sharma; Tobias Otto; Emanuelle Jecrois; Richard Han; Katharine E Sweeney; Samuele Marro; Marius Wernig; Yan Geng; Alan Moses; Cheng Li; Steven P Gygi; Richard A Young; Piotr Sicinski
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.