Literature DB >> 21167519

The prostate cancer risk calculator from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial underestimates the risk of high grade cancer in contemporary referral patients.

Tin C Ngo1, Brit B Turnbull, Philip W Lavori, Joseph C Presti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prostate cancer risk calculator from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial estimates the risk of positive biopsy and 1 containing high grade disease (Gleason score 7 or greater) based on prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination, family history, race and prior negative biopsy. Since data used to create the calculator came from an unreferred population that underwent mainly sextant biopsy, to our knowledge its usefulness in the contemporary urology practice is unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed the same multivariate logistic regression used to derive the prostate cancer risk calculator in a cohort of men from the Stanford Prostate Needle Biopsy Database who underwent initial prostate needle biopsy using an extended 12-core scheme.
RESULTS: Our predictions of overall prostate cancer risk did not differ significantly from those of the calculator. Prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination and family history were independent risk factors. However, our model predicted a much greater risk of high grade disease than the prostate cancer risk calculator. Prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination and age were independent risk factors for high grade disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The difference between our estimated risk of high grade prostate cancer and that of the prostate cancer risk calculator can be potentially explained by 1) differences between the cohorts (referred vs unreferred) or 2) the difference in grading, ie grading accuracy due to the difference in biopsy schemes or to temporally related grade shifts. Caution should be used when applying the prostate cancer risk calculator to counsel patients referred for suspicion of prostate cancer since it underestimates the risk of high grade disease. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21167519      PMCID: PMC4296968          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Ziding Feng; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Prostate biopsy: indications and technique.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; L Andrew Eskew; David L McCullough
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon.

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; George H Barrows; David F Penson; Pam D H Kowalczyk; M Melinda Sanders; Judith Fine
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  John Concato; Carolyn K Wells; Ralph I Horwitz; David Penson; Graeme Fincke; Dan R Berlowitz; Gregory Froehlich; Dawna Blake; Martyn A Vickers; Gerald A Gehr; Nabil H Raheb; Gail Sullivan; Peter Peduzzi
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-09

5.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Christopher R King; John E McNeal; Harcharan Gill; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The influence of prostate size on cancer detection.

Authors:  R G Uzzo; J T Wei; R S Waldbaum; A P Perlmutter; J C Byrne; E D Vaughan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Gary J Miller; Leslie G Ford; Michael M Lieber; R Duane Cespedes; James N Atkins; Scott M Lippman; Susie M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Connie M Szczepanek; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Probabilities of eventually developing or dying of cancer--United States, 1985.

Authors:  H Seidman; M H Mushinski; S K Gelb; E Silverberg
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy: comparison of a novel logistic regression-based model, the prostate cancer risk calculator, and prostate-specific antigen level alone.

Authors:  David J Hernandez; Misop Han; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Samir S Taneja; Stacy J Childs; Georg Bartsch; Alan W Partin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prostate cancer risk prediction in a urology clinic in Mexico.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Jamie C Messer; Christopher Louden; Miguel A Jimenez-Rios; Ian M Thompson; Hector R Camarena-Reynoso
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 2.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Peter C Albertsen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer using the prostate cancer prevention Trial Risk Calculator in a community setting.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Donna P Ankerst; Ziding Feng; Rong Fu; Janet L Stanford; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Andreas Boeck; Stephen J Freedland; J Stephen Jones; Angel M Cronin; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson; Michael W Kattan; Eric A Klein; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Jenny Donovan; Dipen J Parekh; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Amine Benchikh; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Daniel M Moreira; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja; Andrew J Vickers; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.