Literature DB >> 12478092

Prostate biopsy: indications and technique.

Brian R Matlaga1, L Andrew Eskew, David L McCullough.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The last decade has seen numerous modifications in the way prostate cancer is diagnosed. We review the current indications for and methods of prostate biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The English language literature was reviewed regarding major indications for and methods of prostate biopsy. Pertinent peer reviewed articles were collated and analyzed.
RESULTS: The most widely accepted indication for prostate biopsy is a prostate specific antigen (PSA) value of greater than 4.0 ng./ml. However, some investigators advocate prostate biopsy for men with a PSA value in the 2.5 to 4.0 ng./ml. range, believing that use of this parameter results in detection of a greater number of cases of curable disease. Age specific PSA range, percent free PSA and presence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypia are all considered to be relative indications for prostate biopsy. The current literature describes a trend toward increasing the number of cores obtained and the sites biopsied beyond those of the standard sextant technique. The additional cores in many series are obtained from more lateral regions of the gland.
CONCLUSIONS: Although several criteria are used as indications for initial prostate biopsy, all are based on PSA level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. Future improvements in currently used prostate cancer markers may result in better selection of cases to biopsy. There is no universally accepted technique of prostate gland biopsy. The current literature supports use of more extensive biopsy techniques to increase the likelihood of prostate cancer detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12478092     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000041828.84343.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

Review 1.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prostate Cancer - What's New?

Authors:  D Doddamani; A Kayastha
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Comparison of 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 cores prostate biopsies in the determination of prostate cancer and the importance of prostate volume.

Authors:  Cavit Ceylan; Omer Gokhan Doluoglu; Erdogan Aglamis; Ozkan Baytok
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Simulation of autonomous robotic multiple-core biopsy by 3D ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Kaicheng Liang; Albert J Rogers; Edward D Light; Daniel Von Allmen; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  The prostate cancer risk calculator from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial underestimates the risk of high grade cancer in contemporary referral patients.

Authors:  Tin C Ngo; Brit B Turnbull; Philip W Lavori; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Does an asymmetric lobe in digital rectal examination include any risk for prostate cancer? results of 1495 biopsies.

Authors:  Ömer Yilmaz; Özgür Kurul; Ferhat Ates; Hasan Soydan; Zeki Aktas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  The importance of prostate volume in prostate needle biopsy.

Authors:  Ömer Gökhan Doluoğlu; Çetin Volkan Öztekin; Mehmet Karabakan; Alp Özgür Akdemir; Mesut Çetinkaya
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

9.  Exploring automatic prostate histopathology image Gleason grading via local structure modeling.

Authors:  Daihou Wang; David J Foran; Jian Ren; Hua Zhong; Isaac Y Kim; Xin Qi
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

Review 10.  Role of magnetic resonance methods in the evaluation of prostate cancer: an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Virendra Kumar; Rajeev Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.