Literature DB >> 21167315

Nonfluoroscopic imaging systems reduce radiation exposure in children undergoing ablation of supraventricular tachycardia.

Christina Y Miyake1, Douglas Y Mah, Joseph Atallah, Heath P Oikle, Monica L Melgar, Mark E Alexander, Charles I Berul, Frank Cecchin, Edward P Walsh, John K Triedman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for imaging during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) ablation uses fluoroscopy, which exposes otherwise healthy children to the potential harmful effects of radiation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the adjunct use of nonfluoroscopic imaging reduces radiation exposure during SVT ablation among children.
METHODS: This was a prospective, controlled, single-center study of patients age ≥8 years, weight ≥25 kg, with SVT and normal cardiac anatomy. Patients were randomized to control (fluoroscopy only) or study group (fluoroscopy + AcuNav intracardiac ultrasound + NavX electroanatomic mapping), stratified by operator to one of five electrophysiologists. Fluoroscopy times (minutes) and radiation doses (mGy) were recorded, and outcomes and adverse events were noted.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were enrolled (37 control, 37 study). Median age was 14.7 years (range 8.6-22.3 years); 61% had accessory pathways and 39% had atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Nonfluoroscopic imaging reduced median fluoroscopy time by 59% (18.3 minutes vs 7.5 minutes, P <.001) and radiation exposure by 72% (387 vs 110 mGy, P <.001). In the study group, 26 of 37 had ≤10 minutes of fluoroscopy, including 2 with no fluoroscopy exposure and 2 with <30 seconds. Electrophysiologic procedure time was not affected by use of nonfluoroscopic imaging, but total case times were prolonged by 31 minutes (P <.001). Acute success was 97% in control and 100% in study patients, with no difference in adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Use of nonfluoroscopic imaging during SVT ablation in children resulted in substantial and immediate reductions in fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure without change in acute success or adverse event rates but did increase overall procedural time.
Copyright © 2011 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21167315     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  24 in total

1.  Incidence of Echocardiographic Abnormalities Following Pediatric SVT Ablation: Comparison of Cases Utilizing Fluoroscopy Alone to Cases with Adjunctive 3D Electroanatomic Mapping.

Authors:  Ari J Gartenberg; Robert H Pass; Scott Ceresnak; Lynn Nappo; Christopher M Janson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Factors associated with fluoroscopy exposure during pediatric catheter ablation utilizing electroanatomical mapping.

Authors:  Grace Wan; Kevin M Shannon; Jeremy P Moore
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  [Interventional therapy of tachyarrhythmias in the pediatric population].

Authors:  Gabriele Hessling
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-08-23

4.  A Cost-Effective Analysis of Systematically Using Mapping Systems During Catheter Ablation Procedures in Children and Teenagers.

Authors:  Massimiliano Marini; Daniele Ravanelli; Fabrizio Guarracini; Maurizio Del Greco; Silvia Quintarelli; Anna Cima; Alessio Coser; Marta Martin; Aldo Valentini; Roberto Bonmassari
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Radiation safety protocol using real-time dose reporting reduces patient exposure in pediatric electrophysiology procedures.

Authors:  Akash R Patel; Jamie Ganley; Xiaowei Zhu; Jonathan J Rome; Maully Shah; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Reduction of radiation exposure in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Lesson learned.

Authors:  Roberto De Ponti
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-26

7.  The Benefit of a General, Systematic Use of Mapping Systems During Electrophysiological Procedures in Children and Teenagers: The Experience of an Adult EP Laboratory.

Authors:  Massimiliano Marini; Maurizio Del Greco; Daniele Ravanelli; Anna Cima; Alessio Coser; Giulio Porcedda; Fabrizio Guarracini; Aldo Valentini; Roberto Bonmassari
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  The use of an integrated electroanatomic mapping system and intracardiac echocardiography to reduce radiation exposure in children and young adults undergoing ablation of supraventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Douglas Y Mah; Christina Y Miyake; Elizabeth D Sherwin; Amy Walsh; Michael J Anderson; Kara Western; Dominic J Abrams; Mark E Alexander; Frank Cecchin; Edward P Walsh; John K Triedman
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Nonfluoroscopic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Cryoballoon.

Authors:  Mansour Razminia; Hany Demo; Carlos Arrieta-Garcia; Oliver J D'Silva; Theodore Wang; Richard F Kehoe
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 10.  The Growing Culture Of A Minimally Fluoroscopic Approach In Electrophysiology Lab.

Authors:  Michela Casella; Eleonora Russo; Francesca Pizzamiglio; Sergio Conti; Ghaliah Al-Mohani; Daniele Colombo; Victor Casula; Yuri D Alessandra; Viviana Biagioli; Corrado Carbucicchio; Stefania Riva; Gaetano Fassini; Massimo Moltrasio; Fabrizio Tundo; Martina Zucchetti; Benedetta Majocchi; Vittoria Marino; Giovanni Forleo; Pasquale Santangeli; Luigi Di Biase; Antonio Dello Russo; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.