Literature DB >> 30730399

Contextual Factors Associated With Quality Improvement Success in a Multisite Ambulatory Setting.

Lindsey C Douglas, Moonseong Heo, Namita Azad, Andrew D Racine, Michael L Rinke.   

Abstract

The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ) is a framework of contextual factors for quality improvement (QI) projects. We sought to determine which MUSIQ contextual factors were associated with successful QI initiatives. In a cross-sectional survey study, at a 21-site, ambulatory, urban primary care network, a modified MUSIQ survey tool questionnaire was administered to QI team members. The primary analysis associated objective measures of QI success with MUSIQ contextual factors. Objective QI success was defined as reaching goal percentages of adult patients with diabetes achieving glycated hemoglobin less than 8% and/or pediatric patients who had received combination toddler vaccines. Objective outcomes were compared with a subjective, self-reported outcome measure of QI success because previous literature found subjective outcomes were associated with specific MUSIQ factors. In the 143 survey responses collected, across 21 sites, no contextual factors from the MUSIQ survey were associated with either the adult or pediatric objective measure of QI project success. In a post hoc analysis, objective and subjective measures of success were often not associated and/or negatively correlated. In conclusion, contextual factors were not associated with objective measures of QI outcomes, in contrast to previous studies finding associations with subjective QI outcome measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30730399      PMCID: PMC6679818          DOI: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Qual        ISSN: 1062-2551            Impact factor:   1.095


  10 in total

1.  Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  A Kitson; G Harvey; B McCormack
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-09

Review 2.  The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Patrick W Brady; Michele C Dritz; David K Hooper; W Matthew Linam; Craig M Froehle; Peter Margolis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Lloyd P Provost; Craig M Froehle; Peter A Margolis
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  An exploratory analysis of the model for understanding success in quality.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Craig M Froehle; Amy Cassedy; Lloyd P Provost; Peter A Margolis
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

5.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success.

Authors:  John Øvretveit
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 7.  The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Dionne S Kringos; Rosa Sunol; Cordula Wagner; Russell Mannion; Philippe Michel; Niek S Klazinga; Oliver Groene
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The interplay of contextual elements in implementation: an ethnographic case study.

Authors:  Megan B McCullough; Ann F Chou; Jeffrey L Solomon; Beth Ann Petrakis; Bo Kim; Angela M Park; Ashley J Benedict; Alison B Hamilton; Adam J Rose
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study.

Authors:  Thomas J Waltz; Byron J Powell; Monica M Matthieu; Laura J Damschroder; Matthew J Chinman; Jeffrey L Smith; Enola K Proctor; JoAnn E Kirchner
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  A qualitative study of contextual factors' impact on measures to reduce surgery cancellations.

Authors:  Einar Hovlid; Oddbjørn Bukve
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.