Literature DB >> 21166485

Predictors of outcome in acute traumatic central cord syndrome due to spinal stenosis.

Bizhan Aarabi1, Melvin Alexander, Stuart E Mirvis, Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan, David Chesler, Christopher Maulucci, Mark Iguchi, Carla Aresco, Tiffany Blacklock.   

Abstract

OBJECT: the objective of this study was to elucidate the relationship between admission demographic data, validated injury severity measures on imaging studies, and clinical indicators on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), manual dexterity, and dysesthetic pain at least 12 months after surgery for acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS) due to spinal stenosis.
METHODS: over a 100-month period (January 2000 to April 2008), of 211 patients treated for ATCCS, 59 cases were due to spinal stenosis, and these patients underwent surgical decompression. Five of these patients died, 2 were lost to follow-up, 10 were not eligible for the study, and the remaining 42 were followed for at least 12 months.
RESULTS: in the cohort of 42 patients, mean age was 58.3 years, 83% of the patients were men, and 52.4% of the accidents were due to falls. Mean admission ASIA motor score was 63.8 (upper extremities score, 25.8 and lower extremities score, 39.8), the spinal cord was most frequently compressed at skeletal segments C3-4 and C4-5 (71%), mean midsagittal diameter at the point of maximum compression was 5.6 mm, maximum canal compromise (MCC) was 50.5%, maximum spinal cord compression was 16.5%, and length of parenchymal damage on T2-weighted MR imaging was 29.4 mm. Time after injury until surgery was within 24 hours in 9 patients, 24-48 hours in 10 patients, and more than 48 hours in 23 patients. At the 1-year follow-up, the mean ASIA motor score was 94.1 (upper extremities score, 45.7 and lower extremities score, 47.6), FIM was 111.1, manual dexterity was 64.4% of baseline, and pain level was 3.5. Stepwise regression analysis of 10 independent variables indicated significant relationships between ASIA motor score at follow-up and admission ASIA motor score (p = 0.003), MCC (p = 0.02), and midsagittal diameter (p = 0.02); FIM and admission ASIA motor score (p = 0.03), MCC (p = 0.02), and age (p = 0.02); manual dexterity and admission ASIA motor score (p = 0.0002) and length of parenchymal damage on T2-weighted MR imaging (p = 0.002); and pain level and age (p = 0.02) and length of parenchymal lesion on T2-weighted MR imaging (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: the main indicators of long-term ASIA motor score, FIM, manual dexterity, and dysesthetic pain were admission ASIA motor score, midsagittal diameter, MCC, length of parenchymal damage on T2-weighted MR imaging, and age, but different domains of outcome were determined by different predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21166485     DOI: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  24 in total

1.  Management and prognosis of acute traumatic cervical central cord syndrome: systematic review and Spinal Cord Society-Spine Trauma Study Group position statement.

Authors:  P K Karthik Yelamarthy; H S Chhabra; Alex Vaccaro; Gayatri Vishwakarma; Patrick Kluger; Ankur Nanda; Rainer Abel; Wee Fu Tan; Brian Gardner; P Sarat Chandra; Sandip Chatterjee; Serdar Kahraman; Sait Naderi; Saumyajit Basu; Francois Theron
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Emergency Neurological Life Support: Traumatic Spine Injury.

Authors:  Deborah M Stein; William A Knight
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Emergency Neurological Life Support: Traumatic Spine Injury.

Authors:  Deborah M Stein; Jose A Pineda; Vincent Roddy; William A Knight
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  The effect of vertebral fracture on the early neurologic recovery in patients with central cord syndrome.

Authors:  Gregory D Schroeder; Christopher K Kepler; Nik Hjelm; Alexander R Vaccaro; Michael S Weinstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical radiculopathy: a review.

Authors:  John M Caridi; Matthias Pumberger; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-09

6.  Prophylactic enlargement of the thecal sac volume by spinal expansion duroplasty in patients with unresectable malignant intramedullary tumors and metastases prior to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ingo Fiss; C Bettag; B Schatlo; K von Eckardstein; I Tsogkas; A Schwarz; C von der Brelie; V Rohde
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a Strong Predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion Following Decompressive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Charles A Sansur; David M Ibrahimi; J Marc Simard; David S Hersh; Elizabeth Le; Cara Diaz; Jennifer Massetti; Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Clinical outcomes of late decompression surgery following cervical spinal cord injury with pre-existing cord compression.

Authors:  Tsunehiko Konomi; Akimasa Yasuda; Kanehiro Fujiyoshi; Junichi Yamane; Shinjiro Kaneko; Takatsugu Komiyama; Masakazu Takemitsu; Yoshiyuki Yato; Osahiko Tsuji; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takashi Asazuma
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 9.  Spinal cord injury: how can we improve the classification and quantification of its severity and prognosis?

Authors:  Vibhor Krishna; Hampton Andrews; Abhay Varma; Jacobo Mintzer; Mark S Kindy; James Guest
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Dural tear and resultant cerebrospinal fluid leaks after cervical spinal trauma.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Chi Heon Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.