Literature DB >> 11006067

Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening.

G A Brenes1, E D Paskett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in women, little is known about predictors of adherence to screening.
METHODS: A randomly selected sample of 202 predominantly low-income and African-American women were interviewed. Knowledge of, attitudes and beliefs about, and practices related to flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening were assessed.
RESULTS: The majority of participants were in the precontemplation stage of adoption (56%). There were significant differences by stage of adoption for FS beliefs, FS barriers, risk of developing colorectal cancer, worry about getting colorectal cancer, and physician recommendation to get a FS. Predictors of adherence to FS guidelines were perceiving fewer barriers to getting a FS and having a physician recommend a FS.
CONCLUSION: Seventy-two percent of the women in this study were nonadherent to FS screening guidelines. Psychosocial factors play an important role in screening for colorectal cancer. Ways of reducing barriers and increasing physician recommendations should be explored. Copyright 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11006067     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  65 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Errol J Philip; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 2.  Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health?

Authors:  Michelle van Ryn; Steven S Fu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Colorectal cancer screening: physicians' knowledge of risk assessment and guidelines, practice, and description of barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Pascal Burtin; Martin Dawes; Mark Yaffe; Linda Snell; Mark Roper; Patrizia Zanelli; Alan Pavilanis
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Assessing endoscopic colorectal screening adherence in an emergency department population.

Authors:  Jennifer Christie; Denise Nassisi; Ilene Wilets; Katherine N DuHamel; Gary Winkel; Rhadjena Hilliard; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  A model of disease-specific worry in heritable disease: the influence of family history, perceived risk and worry about other illnesses.

Authors:  Terry A DiLorenzo; Julie Schnur; Guy H Montgomery; Joel Erblich; Gary Winkel; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-02-10

7.  Using decision tree models to depict primary care physicians CRC screening decision heuristics.

Authors:  Sarah B Wackerbarth; Yelena N Tarasenko; Laurel A Curtis; Jennifer M Joyce; Steven A Haist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effectiveness of a primary care practice intervention for increasing colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Mark Dignan; Brent Shelton; Stacey A Slone; Cheri Tolle; Sohail Mohammad; Nancy Schoenberg; Kevin Pearce; Emily Van Meter; Gretchen Ely
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Barriers and facilitators of colon cancer screening among patients at faith-based neighborhood health centers.

Authors:  Melissa Tabbarah; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Mahlon Raymund; Ilene K Jewell; Richard K Zimmerman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2005-02

10.  Monitoring visual status: why patients do or do not comply with practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Derek S Brown; Emily Streyer Carlisle; Gabriel A Picone; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.