Literature DB >> 2116359

Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes.

K E Weber1, L T Diggins.   

Abstract

The effect of large population size on selection response was investigated using Drosophila melanogaster, with four "small" lines of 160 selected parents/generation compared to two "large" lines of 1,600 selected parents/generation. All lines were selected under similar conditions at a selection intensity of approximately 0.55 standard deviations, for 65 generations, for increased ethanol vapor resistance (measured in minutes required to become anesthetized). Two unselected control lines of 320 parents/generation were also maintained. A significant effect of population size was found. The final treatment means and standard errors were: 27.91 +/- 1.28 min (two "large" lines); 19.40 +/- 1.54 min (four "small" lines); and 4.98 +/- 0.35 min (two control lines). To estimate the mutation rate for the trait, two isogenic lines of about 400 selected parents were selected for 29 generations. The mean increase in additive genetic variance per generation was 0.0009 times the initial environmental variance of the outbred lines. This is comparable to other reported mutation rates. Mutation can explain part of the difference in evolved resistance between treatments, but it appears that even at rather large population sizes, a large difference in long-term response can be obtained in larger outbred lines, from more complete utilization of the initial genetic variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2116359      PMCID: PMC1204085     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  20 in total

1.  THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation study.

Authors:  M G Bulmer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Effect of an Experimental Bottleneck upon Quantitative Genetic Variation in the Housefly.

Authors:  E H Bryant; S A McCommas; L M Combs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The genetic relationship of two quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Location of the effects.

Authors:  R W Davies
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. II. The genetic nature of the limits.

Authors:  R C Roberts
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Regular responses to selection. 3. Interaction between located polygenes.

Authors:  S G Spickett; J M Thoday
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  STUDIES ON NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA. II. HERITABILITY AND RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR WING LENGTH IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND D. SIMULANS AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES.

Authors:  A O TANTAWY; G S MALLAH; H R TEWFIK
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  33 in total

1.  Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K E Weber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Predictions of patterns of response to artificial selection in lines derived from natural populations.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits.

Authors:  Toby Johnson; Nick Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The hangover gene defines a stress pathway required for ethanol tolerance development.

Authors:  Henrike Scholz; Mirjam Franz; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Increase in quantitative variation after exposure to environmental stresses and/or introduction of a major mutation: G x E interaction and epistasis or canalization?

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Quantitative genetics of postponed aging in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Analysis of outbred populations.

Authors:  E W Hutchinson; M R Rose
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Quantitative genetics, version 3.0: where have we gone since 1987 and where are we headed?

Authors:  Bruce Walsh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  High-resolution analysis of ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Fred W Wolf; Aylin R Rodan; Linus T-Y Tsai; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Age-specific patterns of genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Fecundity and its genetic covariance with age-specific mortality.

Authors:  M Tatar; D E Promislow; A A Khazaeli; J W Curtsinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  An integrative genomic analysis of the Longshanks selection experiment for longer limbs in mice.

Authors:  João Pl Castro; Michelle N Yancoskie; Campbell Rolian; Yingguang Frank Chan; Marta Marchini; Stefanie Belohlavy; Layla Hiramatsu; Marek Kučka; William H Beluch; Ronald Naumann; Isabella Skuplik; John Cobb; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.