AIM: To assess radiologists reporting rates of incidental vertebral compression fractures in imaging studies. METHODS: We performed a review of the current literature on the prevalence and reporting rates of incidental vertebral compression fractures in radiologic examinations. RESULTS: The bibliographic search revealed 12 studies: 7 studies using conventional radiology and 5 using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The loss of height cut-off to define a vertebral fracture varied from 15% to 25%. Fracture prevalence was high (mean 21.1%; range 9.5%-35%) in both radiographic and MDCT studies (mean 21.6% and 20.2%, respectively). Reporting rates were low with a mean value of 27.4% (range 0%-66.3%) and were significantly lower in MDCT than in radiographic studies (mean 8.1% vs 41.1%). Notably, recent studies showed lower reporting rates than older studies. CONCLUSION: Many scientific studies have confirmed a high prevalence of vertebral compression fractures as incidental findings on imaging studies. However, the underreporting of these fractures, as determined in our study, may negatively affect patient care.
AIM: To assess radiologists reporting rates of incidental vertebral compression fractures in imaging studies. METHODS: We performed a review of the current literature on the prevalence and reporting rates of incidental vertebral compression fractures in radiologic examinations. RESULTS: The bibliographic search revealed 12 studies: 7 studies using conventional radiology and 5 using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The loss of height cut-off to define a vertebral fracture varied from 15% to 25%. Fracture prevalence was high (mean 21.1%; range 9.5%-35%) in both radiographic and MDCT studies (mean 21.6% and 20.2%, respectively). Reporting rates were low with a mean value of 27.4% (range 0%-66.3%) and were significantly lower in MDCT than in radiographic studies (mean 8.1% vs 41.1%). Notably, recent studies showed lower reporting rates than older studies. CONCLUSION: Many scientific studies have confirmed a high prevalence of vertebral compression fractures as incidental findings on imaging studies. However, the underreporting of these fractures, as determined in our study, may negatively affect patient care.
Authors: J S Bauer; D Müller; A Ambekar; M Dobritz; M Matsuura; F Eckstein; E J Rummeny; T M Link Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-12-31 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Sumit R Majumdar; Nancy Kim; Ian Colman; Anthony M Chahal; Gregory Raymond; Ho Jen; Kerry G Siminoski; David A Hanley; Brian H Rowe Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005-04-25
Authors: Brett A Freedman; Benjamin K Potter; Leon J Nesti; Jeffrey R Giuliani; Chadwick Hampton; Timothy R Kuklo Journal: Spine J Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: N Kim; B H Rowe; G Raymond; H Jen; I Colman; S A Jackson; K G Siminoski; A M Chahal; D Folk; S R Majumdar Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Elisabeth A P M Romme; Piet Geusens; Willem F Lems; Erica P A Rutten; Frank W J M Smeenk; Joop P W van den Bergh; Peter ThW van Hal; Emiel F M Wouters Journal: Respir Res Date: 2015-03-07