| Literature DB >> 21160453 |
Jing Tang1, Xiangjie Meng, Hao Liu, Jianglin Zhao, Ligang Zhou, Minghua Qiu, Xianming Zhang, Zhu Yu, Fuyu Yang.
Abstract
Three antimicrobial sphingolipids were separated by bioassay-guided isolation from the chloroform fraction of the crude methanol extract of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) stems and identified as (2S,3S,4R,10E)-2-[(2'R)-2-hydroxytetra-cosanoylamino]-1,3,4-octadecanetriol-10-ene (1), 1-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl(2S,3S,4R,10E)-2-[(2'R)-2-hydroxy-tetracosanoylamino]-1,3,4-octadecanetriol-10-ene (2) and soya-cerebroside I (3) by their physicochemical properties and spectroscopic analysis. They were evaluated to show antifungal and antibacterial activity on test microorganisms including four fungal and three bacterial species. Among them, compound 1, a relatively low polarity aglycone, exhibited stronger antimicrobial activity than its corresponding glycoside 2. The results indicated that sphingolipids could be the main antimicrobial compounds in the crude methanol extract of cucumber stems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21160453 PMCID: PMC6259170 DOI: 10.3390/molecules15129288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of the compounds 1-3.
Mycelia growth inhibitory activity of the crude methanol extract and its fractions of cucumberstems against four phytopathogenic fungi.
| Treatment | Inhibitory rate of the mycelia growth (mean ± SD) (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Carbendazim | 79.2 ± 2.0 | 88.0 ± 0.6 | 29.0 ± 2.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 |
| Methanol extract | 45.0 ± 2.4 | 7.6 ± 3.3 | 20.4 ± 1.4 | 35.0 ± 3.5 |
| Chloroform fraction | 49.4 ± 0.9 | 41.3 ± 1.0 | 44.8 ± 1.7 | 42.2 ± 1.6 |
| 48.5 ± 2.0 | 16.5 ± 3.5 | 41.4 ± 2.8 | 41.6 ± 1.3 | |
| Aqueous fraction | 43.8 ± 1.6 | 6.8 ± 1.8 | 15.6 ± 2.4 | 23.4 ± 2.7 |
Note: Positive control was carbendazim (10 μg/mL). Negative control was ethanol which was tested to have no inhibitory activity. Concentration of the extract or fraction in medium was 1.0 mg/mL.
Bacteria growth inhibition activity of the crude methanol extract and fractions of cucumber stems.
| Treatment | Diameter of inhibitory zone (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Streptomycin sulfate | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| Methanol extract | + | + | ++ |
| Chloroform fraction | ++ | ++ | +++ |
| + | + | + | |
| Aqueous fraction | - | - | - |
Note: The quantity of the extract or fractions in each well was 2.5 mg, and that of streptomycin sulfate in each well was 8 μg. The solvent was DMSO which was tested to have no inhibitory activity. "-", no inhibitory zone; "+", 0< D ≤5mm; "++", 5< D ≤10mm; "+++", D > 10mm.
Mycelia growth inhibition of the compounds 1-3 against four phytopathogenic fungi.
| Treatment | Inhibitory rate of the mycelia growth (Mean ± SD) (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Compd 1 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 22.3 ± 2.4 | 48.4 ± 1.0 | 10.7 ± 2.9 |
| Compd 2 | 46.6 ± 2.5 | 11.2 ± 3.1 | 30.4 ± 1.8 | 9.3 ± 1.5 |
| Compd 3 | 23.5 ± 4.3 | 7.1 ± 3.2 | 24.4 ± 2.2 | 5.5 ± 1.0 |
Note: Both the positive and negative controls were the same as those in Table 1. Concentration of each compound in medium was 100 μg/mL.
Median effective inhibitory concentration (IC50) of compounds 1-3 on phyto-pathogenic bacteria growth.
| Compound | Test bacterium | Toxicity regression equation ( | Correlation coefficient ( | IC50(μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compd 1 |
| 0.9793 | 50.2 | |
|
| 0.9864 | 25.6 | ||
|
| 0.9752 | 15.3 | ||
| Compd 2 |
| 0.9893 | 87.9 | |
|
| 0.9818 | 32.4 | ||
|
| 0.9841 | 17.4 | ||
| Compd 3 |
| 0.9398 | 110.9 | |
|
| 0.9886 | 64.5 | ||
|
| 0.9712 | 37.3 |
Note: Toxicity regression equation Y = aX + b, where Y is the inhibitory probit value, and X is concentration logarithm of compounds. The IC50 values of the positive control streptomycin sulfate on B. subtilis, X. vesicatoria and P. lachrymans were 5.0 μg/mL, 11.6 μg/mL and 9.0 μg/mL, respectively.