Literature DB >> 21159022

Intra- and inter-observer reliability using a noninvasive ultrasound cardiac output monitor in healthy anesthetized children.

Sonny Dhanani1, Nick J Barrowman, Roxanne E Ward, Kimmo T Murto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate and reliable evaluation of cardiac index (CI) in critically ill pediatric patients can optimize their management. Although validated, noninvasive ultrasound measurement techniques have been previously shown to be unreliable because of observer variability.
OBJECTIVE: To confirm intra- and inter-observer reliability when using the noninvasive USCOM(®) in healthy anesthetized children.
METHODS: Prospective observational study at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, included newborns to 12 years of age undergoing elective surgery or magnetic resonance imaging. The USCOM(®) was used to assess CI via aortic flow with a trans-sternal approach. Two trained observers were responsible for taking two measurements of CI each at steady state in randomized succession after stable depth of anesthesia was achieved.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included. Forty-seven (80%) were between 3 and 7 years old, with 57% male. The mean difference ± sd for repeat CI measurements by each of two observers was 0.11 ± 0.47 and 0.05 ± 0.65 l·min(-1) ·m(-2) , respectively. Intra-observer reliability for these repeat measurements by each observer determined by Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.92 and 0.85, respectively. The mean difference ± sd between observers was 0.16 ± 0.59 l·min(-1) ·m(-2) , and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.87. The two observers subjectively rated measurements as 'Difficult' or 'Very difficult' only 14% (16/118) and 3% (4/118) of the time, respectively. No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the USCOM(®) is relatively easy to use and reliable in healthy children when operated by trained users.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159022     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03480.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  10 in total

1.  Measuring the cardiac output in acute emergency admissions: use of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with determination of the learning curve and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  Luke E Hodgson; Richard Venn; Lui G Forni; Theophilus L Samuels; Howard G Wakeling
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-12-10

2.  Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM™) Measurements Prove Unreliable Compared to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adolescents with Cardiac Disease.

Authors:  Avichai Weissbach; Amichay Rotstein; Yaniv Lakovsky; Eytan Kaplan; Gili Kadmon; Einat Birk; Elhanan Nahum
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Fernando Beltramo; Jondavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  [Application of ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in evaluation of cardiac function in children with severe pneumonia].

Authors:  Juan Fan; Zhi-Ying Chen; Peng-Yuan Chen; Chang-Hui Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2016-09

5.  Urgent ultrasound guided hemodynamic assessments by a pediatric medical emergency team: a pilot study.

Authors:  David J Zorko; Karen Choong; Jonathan Gilleland; Barbara Agar; Shawn Baker; Cindy Brennan; Eleanor Pullenayegum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The normal ranges of cardiovascular parameters measured using the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor.

Authors:  Giles N Cattermole; P Y Mia Leung; Grace Y L Ho; Peach W S Lau; Cangel P Y Chan; Stewart S W Chan; Brendan E Smith; Colin A Graham; Timothy H Rainer
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-03

7.  Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kurniawan Taufiq Kadafi; Abdul Latief; Antonius Hocky Pudjiadi
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2020-09-22

8.  Age-specific non-invasive transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound derived haemodynamic reference ranges in elderly Chinese adults.

Authors:  Cangel Pui-Yee Chan; Nandini Agarwal; King-Keung Sin; Sangeeta Narain; Brendan E Smith; Colin A Graham; Timothy H Rainer
Journal:  BBA Clin       Date:  2014-09-28

9.  Temporal haemodynamic changes after bisoprolol treatment in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  Weiwei Zeng; Brian Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06

Review 10.  Current state of noninvasive, continuous monitoring modalities in pediatric anesthesiology.

Authors:  Jan J van Wijk; Frank Weber; Robert J Stolker; Lonneke M Staals
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.733

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.