Literature DB >> 21158942

Genetic engineering including superseding microinjection: new ways to make GM pigs.

Cesare Galli1, Andrea Perota, Dario Brunetti, Irina Lagutina, Giovanna Lazzari, Franco Lucchini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Techniques for genetic engineering of swine are providing genetically modified animals of importance for the field of xenotransplantation, animal models for human diseases and for a variety of research applications. Many of these modifications have been directed toward avoiding naturally existing cellular and antibody responses to species-specific antigens.
METHODS: A number of techniques are today available to engineering the genome of mammals, these range from the well established less efficient method of DNA microinjection into the zygote, the use of viral vectors, to the more recent use of somatic cell nuclear transfer. The use of enzymatic engineering that are being developed now will refine the precision of the genetic modification combined with the use of new vectors like transposons.
RESULTS: The use of somatic cell nuclear transfer is currently the most efficient way to generate genetically modified pigs. The development of enzymatic engineering with zinc-finger nucleases, recombinases and transposons will revolutionize the field. Nevertheless, genetic engineering in large domesticated animals will remain a challenging task.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent improvements in several fields of cell and molecular biology offer new promises and opportunities toward an easier, cost-effective and efficient generation of transgenic pigs.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21158942     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2010.00590.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  7 in total

1.  Versatile co-expression of graft-protective proteins using 2A-linked cassettes.

Authors:  Nella Fisicaro; Sarah L Londrigan; Jamie L Brady; Evelyn Salvaris; Mark B Nottle; Philip J O'Connell; Simon C Robson; Anthony J F d'Apice; Andrew M Lew; Peter J Cowan
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 2.  Clinical lung xenotransplantation--what donor genetic modifications may be necessary?

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser; Christopher Burlak; Mohamed Ezzelarab; Hidetaka Hara; Leela Paris; A Joseph Tector; Carol Phelps; Agnes M Azimzadeh; David Ayares; Simon C Robson; Richard N Pierson
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.907

3.  Direct introduction of gene constructs into the pronucleus-like structure of cloned embryos: a new strategy for the generation of genetically modified pigs.

Authors:  Mayuko Kurome; Simon Leuchs; Barbara Kessler; Elisabeth Kemter; Eva-Maria Jemiller; Beatrix Foerster; Nikolai Klymiuk; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  The role of genetically engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser; Jagdeece Ramsoondar; Carol Phelps; David Ayares
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Effects of concentration of CRISPR/Cas9 components on genetic mosaicism in cytoplasmic microinjected porcine embryos.

Authors:  Fuminori Tanihara; Maki Hirata; Nhien Thi Nguyen; Quynh Anh LE; Takayuki Hirano; Takeshige Otoi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  The effects of electroporation on viability and quality of in vivo-derived bovine blastocysts.

Authors:  Fuminori Tanihara; Maki Hirata; Shigeki Morikawa; Nhien Thi Nguyen; Quynh Anh LE; Takayuki Hirano; Yoshiyuki Fukumi; Toshiaki Abe; Takeshige Otoi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Intrapancreatic ectopic splenic tissue found in a cloned miniature pig.

Authors:  Ok Jae Koo; Seung-Kwon Ha; Sol Ji Park; Hee Jung Park; Su Jin Kim; Daekee Kwon; Jung Taek Kang; Joon Ho Moon; Eun Jung Park; Goo Jang; Byeong Chun Lee
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 1.672

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.