Literature DB >> 22702466

Clinical lung xenotransplantation--what donor genetic modifications may be necessary?

David K C Cooper1, Burcin Ekser, Christopher Burlak, Mohamed Ezzelarab, Hidetaka Hara, Leela Paris, A Joseph Tector, Carol Phelps, Agnes M Azimzadeh, David Ayares, Simon C Robson, Richard N Pierson.   

Abstract

Barriers to successful lung xenotransplantation appear to be even greater than for other organs. This difficulty may be related to several macro anatomic factors, such as the uniquely fragile lung parenchyma and associated blood supply that results in heightened vulnerability of graft function to segmental or lobar airway flooding caused by loss of vascular integrity (also applicable to allotransplants). There are also micro-anatomic considerations, such as the presence of large numbers of resident inflammatory cells, such as pulmonary intravascular macrophages and natural killer (NK) T cells, and the high levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) associated with the microvasculature. We have considered what developments would be necessary to allow successful clinical lung xenotransplantation. We suggest this will only be achieved by multiple genetic modifications of the organ-source pig, in particular to render the vasculature resistant to thrombosis. The major problems that require to be overcome are multiple and include (i) the innate immune response (antibody, complement, donor pulmonary and recipient macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and NK cells), (ii) the adaptive immune response (T and B cells), (iii) coagulation dysregulation, and (iv) an inflammatory response (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, HMGB1, C-reactive protein). We propose that the genetic manipulation required to provide normal thromboregulation alone may include the introduction of genes for human thrombomodulin/endothelial protein C-receptor, and/or tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and/or CD39/CD73; the problem of pig vWF may also need to be addressed. It would appear that exploration of every available therapeutic path will be required if lung xenotransplantation is to be successful. To initiate a clinical trial of lung xenotransplantation, even as a bridge to allotransplantation (with a realistic possibility of survival long enough for a human lung allograft to be obtained), significant advances and much experimental work will be required. Nevertheless, with the steadily increasing developments in techniques of genetic engineering of pigs, we are optimistic that the goal of successful clinical lung xenotransplantation can be achieved within the foreseeable future. The optimistic view would be that if experimental pig lung xenotransplantation could be successfully managed, it is likely that clinical application of this and all other forms of xenotransplantation would become more feasible.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22702466      PMCID: PMC3775598          DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2012.00708.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  180 in total

1.  Role of recombinant hirudin in a pig-to-human lung transplantation model.

Authors:  H Schelzig; A Vogel; C Krischer; F Simon; D Abendroth
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Effect of particles on sheep lung hemodynamics parallels depletion and recovery of intravascular macrophages.

Authors:  Y Sone; A Nicolaysen; N C Staub
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1997-11

3.  Mean xenograft survival of 14.6 days in a small group of hDAF-transgenic pig hearts transplanted orthotopically into baboons.

Authors:  P Brenner; M Schmoeckel; C Wimmer; V Eder; A Rucker; T Felbinger; S Uchita; M Hinz; U Brandl; B Meiser; H Reichenspurner; C Hammer; B Reichart
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 4.  Controlling coagulation dysregulation in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Peter J Cowan; Simon C Robson; Anthony J F d'Apice
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Identification of new carbohydrate and membrane protein antigens in cardiac xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Guerard W Byrne; Paul G Stalboerger; Zeji Du; Tessa R Davis; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Life-supporting human complement regulator decay accelerating factor transgenic pig liver xenograft maintains the metabolic function and coagulation in the nonhuman primate for up to 8 days.

Authors:  P Ramirez; R Chavez; M Majado; V Munitiz; A Muñoz; Q Hernandez; C G Palenciano; G Pino-Chavez; M Loba; A Minguela; J Yelamos; M R Gago; A S Vizcaino; H Asensi; M G Cayuela; B Segura; F Marin; A Rubio; T Fuente; R Robles; F S Bueno; T Sansano; F Acosta; J M Rodriguez; F Navarro; J Cabezuelo; E Cozzi; D J White; R Y Calne; P Parrilla
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Generation of soluble human tumor necrosis factor-α receptor 1-Fc transgenic pig.

Authors:  Bumrae Cho; Ok Jae Koo; Jong-Ik Hwang; Hwajung Kim; Eun Mi Lee; Sunghoon Hurh; Sol Ji Park; Han Ro; Jaeseok Yang; Charles D Surh; Anthony J D'Apice; Byeong Chun Lee; Curie Ahn
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Genetically-modified pig mesenchymal stromal cells: xenoantigenicity and effect on human T-cell xenoresponses.

Authors:  Mohamed Ezzelarab; Corin Ezzelarab; Tyler Wilhite; Goutham Kumar; Hidetaka Hara; David Ayares; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.907

9.  Prolonged function of macrophage, von Willebrand factor-deficient porcine pulmonary xenografts.

Authors:  E Cantu; K R Balsara; B Li; C Lau; S Gibson; A Wyse; K Baig; J Gaca; G V Gonzalez-Stawinski; T Nichols; W Parker; R D Davis
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Lack of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose expression on porcine endothelial cells prevents complement-induced lysis but not direct xenogeneic NK cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Bettina C Baumann; Pietro Forte; Robert J Hawley; Robert Rieben; Mårten K J Schneider; Jörg D Seebach
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  27 in total

1.  The case for xenotransplantation.

Authors:  David K C Cooper
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Pig genomics for biomedicine.

Authors:  Randall S Prather
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Expression of human CD46 modulates inflammation associated with GalTKO lung xenograft injury.

Authors:  L Burdorf; T Stoddard; T Zhang; E Rybak; A Riner; C Avon; A Laaris; X Cheng; E Sievert; G Braileanu; A Newton; C J Phelps; D Ayares; A M Azimzadeh; R N Pierson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 4.  Bioprosthetic heart valves of the future.

Authors:  Rizwan A Manji; Burcin Ekser; Alan H Menkis; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 5.  Lung xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Hisashi Sahara; Hironosuke Watanabe; Thomas Pomposelli; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 6.  Lung xenotransplantation: recent progress and current status.

Authors:  Donald G Harris; Kevin J Quinn; Siamak Dahi; Lars Burdorf; Agnes M Azimzadeh; Richard N Pierson
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 7.  Future prospects for tissue engineered lung transplantation: decellularization and recellularization-based whole lung regeneration.

Authors:  Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Amogh Sivarapatna; Kevin Rocco; Atsushi Nanashima; Takeshi Nagayasu; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 8.  Immunobiology of liver xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Christopher Burlak; Joshua P Waldman; Andrew J Lutz; Leela L Paris; Massimiliano Veroux; Simon C Robson; Michael A Rees; David Ayares; Bruno Gridelli; A Joseph Tector; David Kc Cooper
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  Development of a consensus protocol to quantify primate anti-non-Gal xenoreactive antibodies using pig aortic endothelial cells.

Authors:  Agnes M Azimzadeh; Guerard W Byrne; Mohamed Ezzelarab; Emily Welty; Gheorghe Braileanu; Xiangfei Cheng; Simon C Robson; Christopher G A McGregor; David K C Cooper; Richard N Pierson
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 10.  The role of genetically engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser; Jagdeece Ramsoondar; Carol Phelps; David Ayares
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 7.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.