Literature DB >> 21156165

Cognitive bias in the chick anxiety-depression model.

Amy L Salmeto1, Kristen A Hymel, Erika C Carpenter, Ben O Brilot, Melissa Bateson, Kenneth J Sufka.   

Abstract

Cognitive bias is a phenomenon that presents in clinical populations where anxious individuals tend to adopt a more pessimistic-like interpretation of ambiguous aversive stimuli whereas depressed individuals tend to adopt a less optimistic-like interpretation of ambiguous appetitive stimuli. To further validate the chick anxiety-depression model as a neuropsychiatric simulation we sought to quantify this cognitive endophenotype. Chicks exposed to an isolation stressor of 5m to induce an anxiety-like or 60 m to induce a depressive-like state were then tested in a straight alley maze to a series of morphed ambiguous appetitive (chick silhouette) to aversive (owl silhouette) cues. In non-isolated controls, runway start and goal latencies generally increased as a function of greater amounts of aversive characteristics in the cues. In chicks in the anxiety-like state, runway latencies were increased to aversive ambiguous cues, reflecting more pessimistic-like behavior. In chicks in the depression-like state, runway latencies were increased to both aversive and appetitive ambiguous cues, reflecting more pessimistic-like and less optimistic-like behavior, respectively.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21156165     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  48 in total

1.  A glass full of optimism: enrichment effects on cognitive bias in a rat model of depression.

Authors:  Sophie Helene Richter; Anita Schick; Carolin Hoyer; Katja Lankisch; Peter Gass; Barbara Vollmayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?

Authors:  S Henry; C Fureix; R Rowberry; M Bateson; M Hausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-01-12

3.  Negative emotional contagion and cognitive bias in common ravens (Corvus corax).

Authors:  Jessie E C Adriaense; Jordan S Martin; Martina Schiestl; Claus Lamm; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry.

Authors:  Ľubor Košťál; Zuzana Skalná; Katarína Pichová
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Unveiling the neural underpinnings of optimism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fatima Erthal; Aline Bastos; Liliane Vilete; Leticia Oliveira; Mirtes Pereira; Mauro Mendlowicz; Eliane Volchan; Ivan Figueira
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Evaluation of a novel translational task for assessing emotional biases in different species.

Authors:  Michael H Anderson; Chloë Hardcastle; Marcus R Munafò; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Investigating the psychopharmacology of cognitive affective bias in rats using an affective tone discrimination task.

Authors:  Michael H Anderson; Marcus R Munafò; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Brief owner absence does not induce negative judgement bias in pet dogs.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Stefanie Riemer; Claudia M Rosam; Julia Schößwender; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Impaired social behavior in chicks exposed to sodium valproate during the last week of embryogenesis.

Authors:  Hideo Nishigori; Keisuke Kagami; Ai Takahashi; Yu Tezuka; Atsushi Sanbe; Hidekazu Nishigori
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Vigilance for threat accounts for inter-individual variation in physiological responses to adversity in rhesus macaques: A cognition × environment approach.

Authors:  Tara M Mandalaywala; Lauren A Petrullo; Karen J Parker; Dario Maestripieri; James P Higham
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.