Literature DB >> 22870825

Brief owner absence does not induce negative judgement bias in pet dogs.

Corsin A Müller1, Stefanie Riemer, Claudia M Rosam, Julia Schößwender, Friederike Range, Ludwig Huber.   

Abstract

Humans in a negative emotional state are more likely to judge ambiguous stimuli as negative. In recent years, similar judgement biases have been found in some non-human animals that were exposed to long-term or short-term treatments aimed at influencing their affective states. Here we tested pet dogs in the presence and absence of their owners in a judgement bias test with an established go/no-go procedure. Even though owner absence is thought to induce a state of anxiety in dogs that have formed an attachment bond with their primary caretakers, we found no difference between the dogs' responses to ambiguous stimuli in the presence or absence of their owners. This result may be explained by the absence of anxiety in dogs that are accustomed to brief periods of separation from their owners, or by a sensitivity limit of the customary judgement bias tests in non-human animals when only a moderate, short-term state of anxiety is induced. In addition, we found significant differences between individuals and populations in the responses to ambiguous stimuli, which give impetus for further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22870825      PMCID: PMC4032111          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0526-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  8 in total

1.  Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state.

Authors:  Emma J Harding; Elizabeth S Paul; Michael Mendl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety.

Authors:  M W Eysenck; K Mogg; J May; A Richards; A Mathews
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1991-05

3.  Dogs showing separation-related behaviour exhibit a 'pessimistic' cognitive bias.

Authors:  Michael Mendl; Julie Brooks; Christine Basse; Oliver Burman; Elizabeth Paul; Emily Blackwell; Rachel Casey
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Anxiety-induced cognitive bias in non-human animals.

Authors:  Oliver H P Burman; Richard M A Parker; Elizabeth S Paul; Michael T Mendl
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-06-26

5.  Stereotyping starlings are more 'pessimistic'.

Authors:  Ben O Brilot; Lucy Asher; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Cognitive bias in the chick anxiety-depression model.

Authors:  Amy L Salmeto; Kristen A Hymel; Erika C Carpenter; Ben O Brilot; Melissa Bateson; Kenneth J Sufka
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth's (1969) Strange Situation Test.

Authors:  J Topál; A Miklósi; V Csányi; A Dóka
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Suzanne Desire; Sarah E Gartside; Geraldine A Wright
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?

Authors:  S Henry; C Fureix; R Rowberry; M Bateson; M Hausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-01-12

2.  A promising novel judgement bias test to evaluate affective states in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Carlotta Burani; Annalisa Pelosi; Paola Valsecchi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task.

Authors:  Samantha Jones; Elizabeth S Paul; Peter Dayan; Emma S J Robinson; Michael Mendl
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Mood As Cumulative Expectation Mismatch: A Test of Theory Based on Data from Non-verbal Cognitive Bias Tests.

Authors:  Camille M C Raoult; Julia Moser; Lorenz Gygax
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-14

5.  Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Shanis Barnard; Deborah L Wells; Adam D S Milligan; Gareth Arnott; Peter G Hepper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Towards a comparative science of emotion: Affect and consciousness in humans and animals.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Paul; Shlomi Sher; Marco Tamietto; Piotr Winkielman; Michael T Mendl
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  Modelling cognitive affective biases in major depressive disorder using rodents.

Authors:  Claire A Hales; Sarah A Stuart; Michael H Anderson; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  Making Decisions under Ambiguity: Judgment Bias Tasks for Assessing Emotional State in Animals.

Authors:  Sanne Roelofs; Hetty Boleij; Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Happy hamsters? Enrichment induces positive judgement bias for mildly (but not truly) ambiguous cues to reward and punishment in Mesocricetus auratus.

Authors:  Emily J Bethell; Nicola F Koyama
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats.

Authors:  Carlotta Burani; Shanis Barnard; Deborah Wells; Annalisa Pelosi; Paola Valsecchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.