Literature DB >> 22183974

Evaluation of a novel translational task for assessing emotional biases in different species.

Michael H Anderson1, Chloë Hardcastle, Marcus R Munafò, Emma S J Robinson.   

Abstract

Changes in the processing of emotional information are key features of affective disorders. Neuropsychological tests based on emotional faces or words are used to detect emotional/affective biases in humans, but these tests are not applicable to animal species. In the present study, we investigated whether a novel affective tone discrimination task (ATDT), developed to study emotion-related behaviour in rats, could also be used to quantify changes in affective states in humans. To date, the methods used in human neuropsychology have not been applicable to animal experiments. Participants completed a training session in which they learnt to discriminate specific tone frequencies and to correctly respond in order to gain emotionally valenced outcomes, to obtain rewards (money), or to avoid punishment (an aversive sound clip). During a subsequent test session, additional ambiguous probe tones were presented at frequencies intermediate between the reward and avoidance paired tones. At the end of the task, participants completed self-report questionnaires. All participants made more avoidance responses to the most ambiguous tone cues, suggesting a bias towards avoidance of punishment. Individual differences in the degrees of bias observed were correlated with anxiety measures, suggesting the task's sensitivity to differences in state anxiety within a healthy population. Further studies in clinical populations will be necessary to assess the task's sensitivity to pathological anxiety states. These data suggest that this affective tone discrimination task provides a novel method to study cognitive affective biases in different species, including humans, and offers a novel assessment to study anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22183974     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-011-0076-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  35 in total

Review 1.  What should animal models of depression model?

Authors:  Alan Frazer; David A Morilak
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Successive negative contrast in one-way avoidance learning in female Roman rats.

Authors:  C Torres; A Cándido; M D Escarabajal; L de la Torre; A Maldonado; A Tobeña; A Fernández-Teruel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-07-21

3.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders.

Authors:  A Mathews; C MacLeod
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Stereotyping starlings are more 'pessimistic'.

Authors:  Ben O Brilot; Lucy Asher; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Cognitive bias in the chick anxiety-depression model.

Authors:  Amy L Salmeto; Kristen A Hymel; Erika C Carpenter; Ben O Brilot; Melissa Bateson; Kenneth J Sufka
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Mood-congruent bias in affective go/no-go performance of unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Kristine Erickson; Wayne C Drevets; Luke Clark; Dara M Cannon; Earle E Bain; Carlos A Zarate; Dennis S Charney; Barbara J Sahakian
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Increased positive versus negative affective perception and memory in healthy volunteers following selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition.

Authors:  Catherine J Harmer; Nicholas C Shelley; Philip J Cowen; Guy M Goodwin
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Affective significance enhances covert attention: roles of anxiety and word familiarity.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Michael W Eysenck
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Anxiety impairs decision-making: psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Andrei C Miu; Renata M Heilman; Daniel Houser
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Translational Assessment of Reward and Motivational Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Andre Der-Avakian; Samuel A Barnes; Athina Markou; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

2.  Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?

Authors:  S Henry; C Fureix; R Rowberry; M Bateson; M Hausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-01-12

3.  Investigating the psychopharmacology of cognitive affective bias in rats using an affective tone discrimination task.

Authors:  Michael H Anderson; Marcus R Munafò; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  A promising novel judgement bias test to evaluate affective states in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Carlotta Burani; Annalisa Pelosi; Paola Valsecchi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 5.  Translational Assessments of Reward and Anhedonia: A Tribute to Athina Markou.

Authors:  Andre Der-Avakian; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 6.  Impact of anxiety on prefrontal cortex encoding of cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Junchol Park; Bita Moghaddam
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates.

Authors:  Anita Schick; Michèle Wessa; Barbara Vollmayr; Christine Kuehner; Philipp Kanske
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Development of a cognitive bias methodology for measuring low mood in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Daniel Nettle
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Assessment of reward responsiveness in the response bias probabilistic reward task in rats: implications for cross-species translational research.

Authors:  A Der-Avakian; M S D'Souza; D A Pizzagalli; A Markou
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 10.  Modelling cognitive affective biases in major depressive disorder using rodents.

Authors:  Claire A Hales; Sarah A Stuart; Michael H Anderson; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.