Literature DB >> 21153859

Patient and caregiver perceptions of communication of prognosis in high grade glioma.

E A Lobb1, G K B Halkett, A K Nowak.   

Abstract

This study sought the views of patients and their caregivers on their experience of being diagnosed with high grade glioma. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 19 patients and 21 caregivers from the medical oncology unit of a tertiary hospital. A semi-structured face-to-face interview was conducted. Interviews were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Data was analysed based on Grounded Theory and using the constant comparison method. This paper focuses on patient and carer perceptions of the initial communication about the diagnosis of high grade glioma and its prognosis. Themes identified included: (a) shock at hearing the diagnosis; (b) trying to understand and process prognostic information when still in shock; (c) the perception of hope being taken away; (d) individualizing prognostic information; and (e) clinicians' lack of communication skills. This study shows that the first communication of prognosis to patients with high grade glioma and their caregivers requires careful negotiation. It illustrates the inability of individuals to process detailed prognostic information when in a state of initial shock and distress. The importance of balancing honesty with hope in the communication of a poor prognosis is highlighted. We recommend that clinicians seek patient preferences for the amount and type of information they require and that prognostic information be individualized. Detailed discussions of prognosis should only take place with senior medical staff, or advanced trainees who have demonstrated acceptable communication skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153859     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-010-0495-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  24 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines for communicating prognosis and end-of-life issues with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness, and their caregivers.

Authors:  Josephine M Clayton; Karen M Hancock; Phyllis N Butow; Martin H N Tattersall; David C Currow; Jonathan Adler; Sanchia Aranda; Kirsten Auret; Fran Boyle; Annette Britton; Richard Chye; Katy Clark; Patricia Davidson; Jan Maree Davis; Afaf Girgis; Sara Graham; Janet Hardy; Kate Introna; John Kearsley; Ian Kerridge; Linda Kristjanson; Peter Martin; Amanda McBride; Anne Meller; Geoffrey Mitchell; Alison Moore; Beverley Noble; Ian Olver; Sharon Parker; Matthew Peters; Peter Saul; Cameron Stewart; Lyn Swinburne; Bernadette Tobin; Kathryn Tuckwell; Patsy Yates
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 2.  Psychosocial and supportive-care needs in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Susan Catt; Anthony Chalmers; Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Effect of disease burden on health-related quality of life in patients with malignant gliomas.

Authors:  D Osoba; M Brada; M D Prados; W K Yung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know?

Authors:  P N Butow; S Dowsett; R Hagerty; M H N Tattersall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger?

Authors:  M Gattellari; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; S M Dunn; C A MacLeod
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Caring for someone with high-grade glioma: a time of rapid change for caregivers.

Authors:  Ruth McConigley; Georgia Halkett; Elizabeth Lobb; Anna Nowak
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  General information tapes inhibit recall of the cancer consultation.

Authors:  S M Dunn; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; Q J Jones; J S Sheldon; J J Taylor; M D Sumich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Dietmar Krex; Barbara Klink; Christian Hartmann; Andreas von Deimling; Torsten Pietsch; Matthias Simon; Michael Sabel; Joachim P Steinbach; Oliver Heese; Guido Reifenberger; Michael Weller; Gabriele Schackert
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners.

Authors:  A Girgis; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The creation of protection and hope in patients with malignant brain tumours.

Authors:  P Salander; T Bergenheim; R Henriksson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of supportive care needs in patients with primary malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ford; Susan Catt; Anthony Chalmers; Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Privacy-solidarity conflict: the communication with the support group.

Authors:  C Y Finocchiaro; A Botturi; E Lamperti; S Gauri; A Petruzzi; G Simonetti; L Sarno; A Salmaggi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  How much time do we have? Longitudinal perception of prognosis in newly-diagnosed high grade glioma patients and caregivers compared to clinicians.

Authors:  Akanksha Sharma; Briant Fruth; Celina Barrera; Hannah N Farfour; Maciej M Mrugala; Mark K Edwin; Jeff A Sloan; Alyx B Porter
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Feasibility Testing and Refinement of a Supportive Educational Intervention for Carers of Patients with High-Grade Glioma - a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Georgia K B Halkett; Elizabeth A Lobb; Lisa Miller; Thérèse Shaw; Rachael Moorin; Anne Long; Anne King; Jenny Clarke; Stephanie Fewster; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Through the patient's eyes: the value of a comprehensive brain tumor center.

Authors:  Adam M Robin; Tobias Walbert; Tom Mikkelsen; Steven N Kalkanis; Jack Rock; Ian Lee; Mark L Rosenblum
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Gender differences in the evolution of illness understanding among patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Kalen Fletcher; Holly G Prigerson; Elizabeth Paulk; Jennifer Temel; Esme Finlay; Lisa Marr; Ruth McCorkle; Lorna Rivera; Francisco Munoz; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2013-09

7.  The interaction between informal cancer caregivers and health care professionals: a survey of caregivers' experiences of problems and unmet needs.

Authors:  Line Lund; Lone Ross; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Do carer's levels of unmet needs change over time when caring for patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma and how are these needs correlated with distress?

Authors:  G K B Halkett; E A Lobb; T Shaw; M M Sinclair; L Miller; E Hovey; A K Nowak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Prognostic awareness and communication preferences among caregivers of patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  A J Applebaum; K Buda; M Kryza-Lacombe; J J Buthorn; R Walker; K M Shaffer; T A D'Agostino; E L Diamond
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Distress and psychological morbidity do not reduce over time in carers of patients with high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Georgia K B Halkett; Elizabeth A Lobb; Thèrése Shaw; Michelle M Sinclair; Lisa Miller; Elizabeth Hovey; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.