Literature DB >> 21153815

Computed tomography volumetric fat parameters versus body mass index for predicting short-term outcomes of colon surgery.

Stefano Cecchini1, Egildo Cavazzini, Federico Marchesi, Leopoldo Sarli, Luigi Roncoroni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At present, the impact of obesity on short-term outcomes of general surgery remains controversial, especially in the field of laparoscopy. Most studies on the subject have used the body mass index (BMI) to define obesity without distinguishing between visceral and subcutaneous storage. Computed tomography (CT) volumetric analysis permits accurate evaluation of site-specific volume of adipose tissue. The purpose of this study was to compare CT volumetric fat parameters and the BMI for predicting short-term outcomes of colon surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 231 consecutive patients undergoing elective colon resection, with open or laparoscopic technique, from January 2007 to April 2009. CT volumetric quantification of abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue was performed. Intraoperative and perioperative data were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 187 patients were enrolled. BMI showed a direct correlation with fat volumetric parameters but not with the visceral/subcutaneous fat ratio. Operating time was correlated with subcutaneous fat storage and BMI in the laparoscopic right colectomy subgroup. No associations were found with the conversion rate. Length of the hospital stay was correlated with the visceral/subcutaneous fat ratio in the laparoscopic left colectomy subgroup. Whereas the overall postoperative complication rate and mortality were not associated with fat parameters, the postoperative surgical complication rate was associated with visceral volumetric parameters in the laparoscopic left colectomy subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcomes of colon surgery are better predicted by fat volumetric parameters than by the BMI. This study has provided new elements for discussion on the impact of visceral and subcutaneous adiposity in laparoscopic and traditional colon surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21153815     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0888-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  31 in total

1.  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in obese patients.

Authors:  J E Efron; J P Uriburu; S D Wexner; A Pikarsky; C Hamel; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Obesity: is there an increase in perioperative complications in those undergoing elective colon and rectal resection for carcinoma?

Authors:  Thomas H Blee; G Eric Belzer; Pamela J Lambert
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon?

Authors:  Ioannis Raftopoulos; Anita P Courcoulas; David Blumberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  J J Tuech; N Regenet; S Hennekinne; P Pessaux; R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program.

Authors:  Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Karen Richards; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Gender differences in pelvic anatomy and effects on rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Seike; Keiji Koda; Kenji Oda; Chihiro Kosugi; Kimio Shimizu; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

7.  Effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Karl Y Bilimoria; Martin D McCarter; David J Bentrem
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Obesity in general elective surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Markus K Muller; Markus Weber; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Impact of obesity on short-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Thierry Bège; Bernard Lelong; Daniel Francon; Olivier Turrini; Jérome Guiramand; Jean-Robert Delpero
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Neudecker; F Klein; R Bittner; T Carus; A Stroux; W Schwenk
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  18 in total

1.  Sagittal abdominal diameter is a better predictor than body mass index for duration of laparoscopic left colectomy.

Authors:  Daniel Clerc; Benjamin Blaser; Nicolas Demartines; Dimitrios Christoforidis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Impact of Body Composition on Surgical Outcome in Rectal Cancer Patients, a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  C Heus; N Bakker; W M Verduin; H J Doodeman; A P J Houdijk
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Improving the outcomes in oncological colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Jeroen L A van Vugt; Kostan W Reisinger; Joep P M Derikx; Djamila Boerma; Jan H M B Stoot
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Fully automatic CT-histogram-based fat estimation in dead bodies.

Authors:  Michael Hubig; Sebastian Schenkl; Holger Muggenthaler; Felix Güttler; Andreas Heinrich; Ulf Teichgräber; Gita Mall
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in obese patients: a case-matched series.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Harr; Samuel Luka; Aman Kankaria; Yen-Yi Juo; Samir Agarwal; Vincent Obias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Quantitative Assessment of Visceral Obesity and Postoperative Colon Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Oluwatobi O Ozoya; Erin M Siegel; Thejal Srikumar; Amanda M Bloomer; Amanda DeRenzis; David Shibata
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Visceral and subcutaneous fat as new independent predictive factors of survival in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiao-Ting Li; Lei Tang; Ying Chen; Yan-Ling Li; Xiao-Peng Zhang; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Effect of Visceral Obesity on Surgical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Ji Won Park; Seung-Bum Ryoo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Quantitative measures of visceral adiposity and body mass index in predicting rectal cancer outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Whalen Clark; Erin M Siegel; Y Ann Chen; Xiuhua Zhao; Colin M Parsons; Jonathan M Hernandez; Jill Weber; Shalini Thareja; Junsung Choi; David Shibata
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Sarcopenia, but not visceral fat amount, is a risk factor of postoperative complications after major hepatectomy.

Authors:  Takaaki Higashi; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Katsunobu Taki; Keita Sakamoto; Hideyuki Kuroki; Hidetoshi Nitta; Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Toru Beppu; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.