BACKGROUND: Obesity is a relative contraindication to performing restorative proctocolectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the morbidity and functional results after restorative proctocolectomy in obese patients as compared to a matched cohort of non-obese patients. METHODS: 334 patients who had restorative proctocolectomy were reviewed; obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2. 31 obese patients were matched to 31 non-obese patients for age, gender, steroid use, and diagnosis. Operative time, length of hospitalization, and both perioperative (< 6 weeks) and long-term morbidity (> 6 weeks), especially sepsis, were evaluated. RESULTS: The BMI was significantly higher in the obese group (33.7 vs 23.2) (p < 0.0001), and no difference was found between the obese and non-obese groups relative to the matched parameters of age, gender, steroid use and diagnosis. There was no difference in the rate of mucosectomy performed between the obese and non-obese patients (9.6% vs 3.2%, p = NS). 16% of the obese patients underwent one stage restorative proctocolectomies as compared to 10% in the non-obese group. Operative time was longer in the obese group (229 min vs 196 min; p = 0.02), but overall hospital length of stay was similar (9.7 days vs 7.7 days; p = 0.13). Perioperative morbidity was higher in obese patients (32% vs 9.6%, p = 0.058). However, there was no statistical significance in long-term morbidity (23% vs 32%, p = 0.57) at a mean follow-up of 51 months in the obese group and 53 months in the non-obese group. Obese patients had more stomal complications (10 vs 0%) and incisional hernias (13 vs 3%) (p = NS). Overall the pelvic sepsis-rate was significantly higher in the obese group (16 vs 0%; p < 0.05). 60% of the obese patients who developed pelvic sepsis had pouch-anal anastomosis performed without proximal fecal diversion. Mean bowel movements/24 hours, pad use, nocturnal evacuation, accidents/24 hours and incontinence scores were not statistically significant between the groups. CONCLUSION: Obese patients have a higher rate of pelvic sepsis and peri-operative morbidity when compared to a matched non-obese cohort of patients; however, the functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy in obese patients is not significantly different than in non-obese patients.
BACKGROUND:Obesity is a relative contraindication to performing restorative proctocolectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the morbidity and functional results after restorative proctocolectomy in obesepatients as compared to a matched cohort of non-obesepatients. METHODS: 334 patients who had restorative proctocolectomy were reviewed; obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2. 31 obesepatients were matched to 31 non-obesepatients for age, gender, steroid use, and diagnosis. Operative time, length of hospitalization, and both perioperative (< 6 weeks) and long-term morbidity (> 6 weeks), especially sepsis, were evaluated. RESULTS: The BMI was significantly higher in the obese group (33.7 vs 23.2) (p < 0.0001), and no difference was found between the obese and non-obese groups relative to the matched parameters of age, gender, steroid use and diagnosis. There was no difference in the rate of mucosectomy performed between the obese and non-obesepatients (9.6% vs 3.2%, p = NS). 16% of the obesepatients underwent one stage restorative proctocolectomies as compared to 10% in the non-obese group. Operative time was longer in the obese group (229 min vs 196 min; p = 0.02), but overall hospital length of stay was similar (9.7 days vs 7.7 days; p = 0.13). Perioperative morbidity was higher in obesepatients (32% vs 9.6%, p = 0.058). However, there was no statistical significance in long-term morbidity (23% vs 32%, p = 0.57) at a mean follow-up of 51 months in the obese group and 53 months in the non-obese group. Obesepatients had more stomal complications (10 vs 0%) and incisional hernias (13 vs 3%) (p = NS). Overall the pelvic sepsis-rate was significantly higher in the obese group (16 vs 0%; p < 0.05). 60% of the obesepatients who developed pelvic sepsis had pouch-anal anastomosis performed without proximal fecal diversion. Mean bowel movements/24 hours, pad use, nocturnal evacuation, accidents/24 hours and incontinence scores were not statistically significant between the groups. CONCLUSION:Obesepatients have a higher rate of pelvic sepsis and peri-operative morbidity when compared to a matched non-obese cohort of patients; however, the functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy in obesepatients is not significantly different than in non-obesepatients.
Authors: Coen L Klos; Bashar Safar; Nida Jamal; Steven R Hunt; Paul E Wise; Elisa H Birnbaum; James W Fleshman; Matthew G Mutch; Sekhar Dharmarajan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 3.452