OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of standardized, patient-centered label (PCL) instructions to improve comprehension of prescription drug use compared with typical instructions. METHODS: A total of 500 adult patients recruited from 2 academic and 2 community primary care clinics in Chicago, IL and Shreveport, LA were assigned to receive as follows: (1) standard prescription instructions written as times per day (once, twice 3 times per day) (usual care), (2) PCL instructions that specify explicit timing with standard intervals (morning, noon, evening, bedtime) (PCL), or (3) PCL instructions with a graphic aid to visually depict dose and timing of the medication (PCL + Graphic). The outcome was correct interpretation of label instructions. RESULTS: Instructions with the PCL format were more likely to be correctly interpreted compared with standard instructions (adjusted relative risk [RR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.41). Inclusion of the graphic aid (PCL + Graphic) decreased rates of correct interpretation compared with PCL instructions alone (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97). Patients with low literacy were better able to interpret PCL instructions (low literacy: RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.14-1.68; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PCL approach could improve patients' understanding and use of their medication regimen.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of standardized, patient-centered label (PCL) instructions to improve comprehension of prescription drug use compared with typical instructions. METHODS: A total of 500 adult patients recruited from 2 academic and 2 community primary care clinics in Chicago, IL and Shreveport, LA were assigned to receive as follows: (1) standard prescription instructions written as times per day (once, twice 3 times per day) (usual care), (2) PCL instructions that specify explicit timing with standard intervals (morning, noon, evening, bedtime) (PCL), or (3) PCL instructions with a graphic aid to visually depict dose and timing of the medication (PCL + Graphic). The outcome was correct interpretation of label instructions. RESULTS: Instructions with the PCL format were more likely to be correctly interpreted compared with standard instructions (adjusted relative risk [RR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.41). Inclusion of the graphic aid (PCL + Graphic) decreased rates of correct interpretation compared with PCL instructions alone (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97). Patients with low literacy were better able to interpret PCL instructions (low literacy: RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.14-1.68; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PCL approach could improve patients' understanding and use of their medication regimen.
Authors: Terry C Davis; Michael S Wolf; Pat F Bass; Jason A Thompson; Hugh H Tilson; Marolee Neuberger; Ruth M Parker Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-11-29 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Terry C Davis; Alex D Federman; Pat F Bass; Robert H Jackson; Mark Middlebrooks; Ruth M Parker; Michael S Wolf Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Michael S Wolf; Terry C Davis; William Shrank; David N Rapp; Pat F Bass; Ulla M Connor; Marla Clayman; Ruth M Parker Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2007-06-22
Authors: Michael S Wolf; Paul Shekelle; Niteesh K Choudhry; Jessica Agnew-Blais; Ruth M Parker; William H Shrank Journal: Med Care Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: William H Shrank; Jessica Agnew-Blais; Niteesh K Choudhry; Michael S Wolf; Aaron S Kesselheim; Jerry Avorn; Paul Shekelle Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-09-10
Authors: Stacy Cooper Bailey; Lauren A Opsasnick; Laura M Curtis; Alex D Federman; Julia Y Benavente; Rachel O'Conor; Michael S Wolf Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: H Shonna Yin; Ruth M Parker; Lee M Sanders; Alan Mendelsohn; Benard P Dreyer; Stacy Cooper Bailey; Deesha A Patel; Jessica J Jimenez; Kwang-Youn A Kim; Kara Jacobson; Michelle C J Smith; Laurie Hedlund; Nicole Meyers; Terri McFadden; Michael S Wolf Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Marina Serper; Rachel E Patzer; Peter P Reese; Kamila Przytula; Rachel Koval; Daniela P Ladner; Josh Levitsky; Michael M Abecassis; Michael S Wolf Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Claudia M Lora; Alexander W Sokolovsky; Daniel R Touchette; Jing Jin; Xiaojing Hu; Weihua Gao; Ben S Gerber Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Rachel E Patzer; Marina Serper; Peter P Reese; Kamila Przytula; Rachel Koval; Daniela P Ladner; Josh M Levitsky; Michael M Abecassis; Michael S Wolf Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Laura M Curtis; Rebecca J Mullen; Allison Russell; Aimee Fata; Stacy C Bailey; Gregory Makoul; Michael S Wolf Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-07-02