BACKGROUND: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a phase II study evaluating sunitinib in patients with progressive metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma following prior gemcitabine-based therapy (trial CALGB 80603; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00397787). The primary endpoint was to determine the disease control rate (DCR) as measured by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (complete response, partial response [PR], and stable disease) at 6 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0-2 and with progressive pancreas adenocarcinoma following treatment with gemcitabine were eligible. Sunitinib was dosed at 50 mg orally days 1-28, every 42 days (1 cycle). The statistical plan called for a three-stage design. A DCR ≥15% was considered worthy of further study. RESULTS: In total, 77 patients were enrolled. Forty-two (54.6%) enrollees were male. The median age was 65 years. The ECOG performance status score distribution was: 0, 39%; 1, 50%; 2, 11%. The DCR was 21.6%; one patient (1.4%) had a PR and 15 patients (20.3%) had stable disease as their best response. The progression-free survival time was 1.31 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.38 months) and overall survival time was 3.68 months (95% CI, 3.06-4.24 months). CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary endpoint; however sunitinib had minimal activity and moderate toxicity in a population of gemcitabine-refractory pancreas adenocarcinoma patients. For future studies, limiting enrollment to patients with an ECOG performance status score of 0-1 is recommended.
BACKGROUND: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a phase II study evaluating sunitinib in patients with progressive metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma following prior gemcitabine-based therapy (trial CALGB 80603; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00397787). The primary endpoint was to determine the disease control rate (DCR) as measured by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (complete response, partial response [PR], and stable disease) at 6 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0-2 and with progressive pancreas adenocarcinoma following treatment with gemcitabine were eligible. Sunitinib was dosed at 50 mg orally days 1-28, every 42 days (1 cycle). The statistical plan called for a three-stage design. A DCR ≥15% was considered worthy of further study. RESULTS: In total, 77 patients were enrolled. Forty-two (54.6%) enrollees were male. The median age was 65 years. The ECOG performance status score distribution was: 0, 39%; 1, 50%; 2, 11%. The DCR was 21.6%; one patient (1.4%) had a PR and 15 patients (20.3%) had stable disease as their best response. The progression-free survival time was 1.31 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.38 months) and overall survival time was 3.68 months (95% CI, 3.06-4.24 months). CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary endpoint; however sunitinib had minimal activity and moderate toxicity in a population of gemcitabine-refractory pancreas adenocarcinomapatients. For future studies, limiting enrollment to patients with an ECOG performance status score of 0-1 is recommended.
Authors: H A Burris; M J Moore; J Andersen; M R Green; M L Rothenberg; M R Modiano; M C Cripps; R K Portenoy; A M Storniolo; P Tarassoff; R Nelson; F A Dorr; C D Stephens; D D Von Hoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brian M Wolpin; Aram F Hezel; Thomas Abrams; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Jennifer A Chan; Peter C Enzinger; Brittany Allen; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Charles S Fuchs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K Fujimoto; R Hosotani; M Wada; J U Lee; T Koshiba; Y Miyamoto; S Tsuji; S Nakajima; R Doi; M Imamura Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Michele Milella; Alain Gelibter; Serena Di Cosimo; Emilio Bria; Enzo Maria Ruggeri; Paolo Carlini; Paola Malaguti; Mario Pellicciotta; Edmondo Terzoli; Francesco Cognetti Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Maria S Pino; Michele Milella; Alain Gelibter; Isabella Sperduti; Salvatore De Marco; Carmen Nuzzo; Emilio Bria; Livio Carpanese; Enzo M Ruggeri; Paolo Carlini; Francesco Cognetti Journal: Oncology Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Kenneth P Olive; Michael A Jacobetz; Christian J Davidson; Aarthi Gopinathan; Dominick McIntyre; Davina Honess; Basetti Madhu; Mae A Goldgraben; Meredith E Caldwell; David Allard; Kristopher K Frese; Gina Denicola; Christine Feig; Chelsea Combs; Stephen P Winter; Heather Ireland-Zecchini; Stefanie Reichelt; William J Howat; Alex Chang; Mousumi Dhara; Lifu Wang; Felix Rückert; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Kamel Izeradjene; Sunil R Hingorani; Pearl Huang; Susan E Davies; William Plunkett; Merrill Egorin; Ralph H Hruban; Nigel Whitebread; Karen McGovern; Julian Adams; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; John Griffiths; David A Tuveson Journal: Science Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eric Van Cutsem; Walter L Vervenne; Jaafar Bennouna; Yves Humblet; Sharlene Gill; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Chris Verslype; Werner Scheithauer; Aijing Shang; Jan Cosaert; Malcolm J Moore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel J Renouf; Patricia A Tang; Pierre Major; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Bindi Dhesy-Thind; John R Goffin; David Hedley; Lisa Wang; L Doyle; Malcolm J Moore Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Andrew H Ko; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Jessica Van Ziffle; Olga M Mirzoeva; Nancy M Joseph; AmirAli Talasaz; Peter Kuhn; Margaret A Tempero; Eric A Collisson; R Kate Kelley; Alan P Venook; Elizabeth Dito; Anna Ong; Sharvina Ziyeh; Ryan Courtin; Regina Linetskaya; Sanaa Tahiri; W Michael Korn Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Benjamin Carlisle; Nadine Demko; Georgina Freeman; Amanda Hakala; Nathalie MacKinnon; Tim Ramsay; Spencer Hey; Alex John London; Jonathan Kimmelman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: L Gutierrez-Sainz; D Viñal; J Villamayor; D Martinez-Perez; J A Garcia-Cuesta; I Ghanem; A Custodio; J Feliu Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 3.405