Literature DB >> 34249445

G2M checkpoint pathway alone is associated with drug response and survival among cell proliferation-related pathways in pancreatic cancer.

Masanori Oshi1,2, Ankit Patel1, Lan Le1,3, Yoshihisa Tokumaru1,4, Li Yan5, Ryusei Matsuyama2, Itaru Endo2, Kazuaki Takabe1,2,3,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Given the severe side effects of the treatments and poor survival, prognostic and predictive biomarkers to guide management of pancreatic cancer are in critical need. We hypothesized that cell proliferation-related pathways are associated with drug response and survival in pancreatic cancer. Six Hallmark cell proliferation-related gene sets (G2M Checkpoint, E2F Targets, MYC Targets V1 and V2, Mitotic Spindle, p53 pathway) defined by MSigDB in gene set variant analysis were evaluated in 3 independent cohorts- TCGA-PAAD (n = 176), GSE57495 (n = 63), and GSE62452 (n = 69). G2M and E2F, as well as Mitotic and p53 pathway correlated highly with other gene sets. All pathways were significantly correlated with MKI67 expression and its proliferation score, but none with cytolytic activity and the rate of pathologically complete resection (R0). All pathways were significantly associated with high alteration and expression of KRAS gene except for MYC v1. G2M, E2F, and p53 pathway were significantly associated with high alteration of TP53 gene. Interestingly, different pathways correlated with the AUC of different cancer therapeutics, such as Gemcitabine (Mitotic: r = 0.706 [P = 0.01]), Paclitaxel (MYC v2: r = -0.636 [P < 0.05]), Apatinib (Mitotic: r = -0.556 [P = 0.03]), Palbociclib (E2F: r = 0.675 [P < 0.01]), and Sorafenib (G2M: r = -0.593 [P = 0.03]). Among all six pathways, only G2M was consistently associated with worse patient survival in all three cohorts. In conclusion, each cell proliferation-related pathway was predictive of a unique agent, and the G2M score alone predicts survival in pancreatic cancer. AJCR
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; GSEA; GSVA; Hallmark gene sets; cell cycle; gene expression; gene sets; pancreatic cancer; pathway analysis; proliferation; survival; transcriptome; tumor microenvironment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34249445      PMCID: PMC8263638     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  57 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal.

Authors:  Jianjiong Gao; Bülent Arman Aksoy; Ugur Dogrusoz; Gideon Dresdner; Benjamin Gross; S Onur Sumer; Yichao Sun; Anders Jacobsen; Rileen Sinha; Erik Larsson; Ethan Cerami; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  Prior exposure of pancreatic tumors to [sorafenib + vorinostat] enhances the efficacy of an anti-PD-1 antibody.

Authors:  Laurence Booth; Jane Lisa Roberts; Andrew Poklepovic; Paul Dent
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection.

Authors:  Arthur Liberzon; Chet Birger; Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; Mahmoud Ghandi; Jill P Mesirov; Pablo Tamayo
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 5.  Sorafenib: a review of its use in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Armando Santoro
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John P Neoptolemos; Deborah D Stocken; Helmut Friess; Claudio Bassi; Janet A Dunn; Helen Hickey; Hans Beger; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Christos Dervenis; François Lacaine; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli; Akos Pap; David Spooner; David J Kerr; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Extraordinary response of metastatic pancreatic cancer to apatinib after failed chemotherapy: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Cheng-Ming Li; Zhi-Chao Liu; You-Ting Bao; Xin-Dong Sun; Lin-Lin Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  G2M Cell Cycle Pathway Score as a Prognostic Biomarker of Metastasis in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Hideo Takahashi; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Li Yan; Omar M Rashid; Ryusei Matsuyama; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  6 in total

1.  Abundance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is associated with tumor aggressiveness, immune response, and worse survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Shipra Gandhi; Li Yan; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Rongrong Wu; Akimitsu Yamada; Ryusei Matsuyama; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Intratumoral density of regulatory T cells is a predictor of host immune response and chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Joy Sarkar; Rongrong Wu; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Li Yan; Kazuya Nakagawa; Atsushi Ishibe; Ryusei Matsuyama; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  The clinical relevance of unfolded protein response signaling in breast cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Arya Mariam Roy; Shipra Gandhi; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Li Yan; Akimitsu Yamada; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.942

4.  Higher intra-tumoral expression of pro-coagulation genes is a predictor of angiogenesis, epithelial mesenchymal transition and worse patient survival in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Joy Sarkar; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Li Yan; Takashi Kosaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Masayuki Nagahashi; Chikara Kunisaki; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.942

5.  Conflicting roles of EGFR expression by subtypes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Shipra Gandhi; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Li Yan; Akimitsu Yamada; Ryusei Matsuyama; Takashi Ishikawa; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 5.942

6.  CYP26A1 Is a Novel Cancer Biomarker of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Evidence from Integration Analysis and In Vitro Experiments.

Authors:  Yi Yu; Yunxing Wang; Yufeng Zou; Yuan Yu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.464

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.