Literature DB >> 33866520

Prognostic factors in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients-receiving second-line treatment: a single institution experience.

L Gutierrez-Sainz1, D Viñal2, J Villamayor2, D Martinez-Perez2, J A Garcia-Cuesta2, I Ghanem2, A Custodio2,3,4, J Feliu2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Second-line (2L) treatments for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) achieve a modest benefit at the expense of potential toxicity. In the absence of predictive factors of response, the identification of prognostic factors could help in the therapeutic decisions-making. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic factors associated with shorter survival in patients with advanced PDAC who received 2L treatment.
METHODS: We conducted a single institution retrospective study, which included all patients with advanced PDAC who received 2L treatment between September 2006 and February 2020 at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). Significant variables in the logistic regression model were used to create a prognostic score.
RESULTS: We included 108 patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 5.10 months (95%CI 4.02-6.17). In the multivariate analysis, time to progression (TTP) shorter than 4 months after first-line treatment (OR 4.53 [95%CI 1.28-16.00] p = 0.01), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) greater than 3 at the beginning of 2L (OR 9.07 [95%CI 1.82-45.16] p = 0.01) and CA-19.9 level higher than the upper limit of normal at the beginning of 2L (OR 7.83 [95%CI 1.30-49.97] p = 0.02) were independently associated with OS shorter than 3 months. The prognostic score classified patients into three prognostic groups (good, intermediate and poor) with significant differences in OS (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: TTP shorter than 4 months after first-line treatment, NLR greater than 3 and CA-19.9 level higher than the upper limit of normal at the beginning of 2L were associated with shorter overall survival. We developed a prognostic score that classifies patients with advanced PDAC into three prognostic groups after progression to the first-line. This score could help in the decision-making for 2L treatment.
© 2021. Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Prognostic factors; Second-line treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33866520     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02589-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  31 in total

1.  Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Andrea Wang-Gillam; Chung-Pin Li; György Bodoky; Andrew Dean; Yan-Shen Shan; Gayle Jameson; Teresa Macarulla; Kyung-Hun Lee; David Cunningham; Jean F Blanc; Richard A Hubner; Chang-Fang Chiu; Gilberto Schwartsmann; Jens T Siveke; Fadi Braiteh; Victor Moyo; Bruce Belanger; Navreet Dhindsa; Eliel Bayever; Daniel D Von Hoff; Li-Tzong Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Supportive care in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  B Laquente; A Calsina-Berna; A Carmona-Bayonas; P Jiménez-Fonseca; I Peiró; A Carrato
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Second-line oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil alone for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: outcomes from the CONKO-003 trial.

Authors:  Helmut Oettle; Hanno Riess; Jens M Stieler; Gerhard Heil; Ingo Schwaner; Jörg Seraphin; Martin Görner; Matthias Mölle; Tim F Greten; Volker Lakner; Sven Bischoff; Marianne Sinn; Bernd Dörken; Uwe Pelzer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  David P Ryan; Theodore S Hong; Nabeel Bardeesy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Phase 2 trial of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) as second-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Henry Q Xiong; Gauri R Varadhachary; Joan C Blais; Kenneth R Hess; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II study.

Authors:  A Demols; M Peeters; M Polus; R Marechal; F Gay; E Monsaert; A Hendlisz; J L Van Laethem
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRI.3 vs modified FOLFOX as second-line therapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C Yoo; J Y Hwang; J-E Kim; T W Kim; J S Lee; D H Park; S S Lee; D W Seo; S K Lee; M-H Kim; D J Han; S C Kim; J-L Lee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Milena Ilic; Irena Ilic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew McGuigan; Paul Kelly; Richard C Turkington; Claire Jones; Helen G Coleman; R Stephen McCain
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.