Literature DB >> 21146622

Quantification of cartilage loss in local regions of knee joints using semi-automated segmentation software: analysis of longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

T Iranpour-Boroujeni1, A Watanabe, R Bashtar, H Yoshioka, J Duryea.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative cartilage morphometry is a valuable tool to assess osteoarthritis (OA) progression. Current methodologies generally evaluate cartilage morphometry in a full or partial sub-region of the cartilage plates. This report describes the evaluation of a semi-automated cartilage segmentation software tool capable of quantifying cartilage loss in a local indexed region.
METHODS: We examined the baseline and 24-month follow-up MRI image sets of twenty-four subjects from the progression cohort of Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score of 3 at baseline as the inclusion criteria. A radiologist independently marked a single region of local thinning for each subject, and three additional readers, blinded to time point, segmented the cartilage using a semi-automated software method. Each baseline-24-month segmentation pair was then registered in 3D and the change in cartilage volume was measured.
RESULTS: After 3D registration, the change in cartilage volume was calculated in specified regions centered at the marked point, and for the entire medial compartment of femur. The responsiveness was quantified using the standardized response mean (SRM) values and the percentage of subjects that showed a loss in cartilage volume. The most responsive measure of change was SRM=-1.21, and was found for a region of 10mm from the indexed point. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that measurement of cartilage loss in a local region is superior to larger areas and to the total plate. There also may be an optimal region size (10mm from an indexed point) in which to measure change. In principle, the method is substantially faster than segmenting entire plates or sub-regions.
Copyright © 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21146622      PMCID: PMC3046247          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  37 in total

1.  Does the use of ordered values of subregional change in cartilage thickness improve the detection of disease progression in longitudinal studies of osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Robert J Buck; Bradley T Wyman; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Martin Hudelmaier; Wolfgang Wirth; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-07-15

2.  Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  A A Kshirsagar; P J Watson; J A Tyler; L D Hall
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions.

Authors:  J Duryea; G Neumann; M H Brem; W Koh; F Noorbakhsh; R D Jackson; J Yu; C B Eaton; P Lang
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS)--inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment-based scoring system.

Authors:  Peter R Kornaat; Ruth Y T Ceulemans; Herman M Kroon; Naghmeh Riyazi; Margreet Kloppenburg; Wayne O Carter; Thasia G Woodworth; Johan L Bloem
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The association of cartilage volume with knee pain.

Authors:  D J Hunter; L March; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial.

Authors:  F Eckstein; R J Buck; D Burstein; H C Charles; J Crim; M Hudelmaier; D J Hunter; G Hutchins; C Jackson; V Byers Kraus; N E Lane; T M Link; L S Majumdar; S Mazzuca; P V Prasad; T J Schnitzer; M S Taljanovic; A Vaz; B Wyman; M-P Hellio Le Graverand
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-02-18       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wirth; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Subregional femorotibial cartilage morphology in women--comparison between healthy controls and participants with different grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M-P Hellio Le Graverand; R J Buck; B T Wyman; E Vignon; S A Mazzuca; K D Brandt; M Piperno; H C Charles; M Hudelmaier; D J Hunter; C Jackson; V B Kraus; T M Link; S Majumdar; P V Prasad; T J Schnitzer; A Vaz; W Wirth; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Swelling of articular cartilage depends on the integrity of adjacent cartilage and bone.

Authors:  Garry C Summers; Alison Merrill; Mohammed Sharif; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.875

10.  Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Schnier; M Haubner; J Priebsch; C Glaser; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantitative measurement of medial femoral knee cartilage volume - analysis of the OA Biomarkers Consortium FNIH Study cohort.

Authors:  L F Schaefer; M Sury; M Yin; S Jamieson; I Donnell; S E Smith; J A Lynch; M C Nevitt; J Duryea
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Relation between cartilage volume and meniscal contact in medial osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Sally Arno; Peter S Walker; Christopher P Bell; Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Jonathan Samuels; Steven B Abramson; Ravinder Regatte; Michael Recht
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A rapid, novel method of volumetric assessment of MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow lesions in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C Ratzlaff; A Guermazi; J Collins; J N Katz; E Losina; C Vanwyngaarden; R Russell; T Iranpour; J Duryea
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Local area cartilage segmentation: a semiautomated novel method of measuring cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jeffrey Duryea; Tannaz Iranpour-Boroujeni; Jamie E Collins; Case Vanwynngaarden; Ali Guermazi; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina; Ruby Russell; Charles Ratzlaff
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Cartilage Topography Assessment With Local-Area Cartilage Segmentation for Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Alexander Mathiessen; Erin L Ashbeck; Emily Huang; Edward John Bedrick; C Kent Kwoh; Jeffrey Duryea
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.178

6.  Development of a rapid knee cartilage damage quantification method using magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Lyn Price; Daniel Harper; Grace H Lo; Eric Miller; Robert J Ward; Timothy E McAlindon
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.