BACKGROUND: The purpose was to determine the relationship between the cartilage volumes in different regions of the femur and tibia, and the lengths of contacts between the meniscus and cartilage. The rationale was that less meniscal contact would make the cartilage more susceptible to loss of volume due to degeneration and wear. METHODS: Fifty MRI scans of osteoarthritic knees at varying degrees of severity were obtained. Computer models of the cartilage layers of the distal femur and proximal tibia were generated, from which cartilage volumes and thicknesses were calculated for different regions. The lengths of meniscal contact and heights were measured in frontal and sagittal views. RESULTS: Cartilage loss progressed initially on the central and inner regions of the distal femur, and on the tibia in the region uncovered by the meniscus. As the cartilage volume decreased further, the wear spread medially, and to a lesser extent anteriorly and posteriorly. There were inverse relations between the loss of volume on both the femur and tibia, and the meniscal contacts and heights. CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage loss initially occurred where there was direct contact between the cartilage of the femur and tibia. The meniscus did not prevent this, nor prevent the spread of the wear medially. This may have been due to the progressive reduction of cartilage-meniscal contact as the meniscus subluxed or lost substance, as the cartilage loss and deformity progressed. This suggested that the meniscus was not able to ameliorate the forces and pressures on the cartilage surfaces to prevent degeneration.
BACKGROUND: The purpose was to determine the relationship between the cartilage volumes in different regions of the femur and tibia, and the lengths of contacts between the meniscus and cartilage. The rationale was that less meniscal contact would make the cartilage more susceptible to loss of volume due to degeneration and wear. METHODS: Fifty MRI scans of osteoarthritic knees at varying degrees of severity were obtained. Computer models of the cartilage layers of the distal femur and proximal tibia were generated, from which cartilage volumes and thicknesses were calculated for different regions. The lengths of meniscal contact and heights were measured in frontal and sagittal views. RESULTS:Cartilage loss progressed initially on the central and inner regions of the distal femur, and on the tibia in the region uncovered by the meniscus. As the cartilage volume decreased further, the wear spread medially, and to a lesser extent anteriorly and posteriorly. There were inverse relations between the loss of volume on both the femur and tibia, and the meniscal contacts and heights. CONCLUSIONS:Cartilage loss initially occurred where there was direct contact between the cartilage of the femur and tibia. The meniscus did not prevent this, nor prevent the spread of the wear medially. This may have been due to the progressive reduction of cartilage-meniscal contact as the meniscus subluxed or lost substance, as the cartilage loss and deformity progressed. This suggested that the meniscus was not able to ameliorate the forces and pressures on the cartilage surfaces to prevent degeneration.
Authors: W Wirth; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; B T Wyman; S Maschek; M Hudelmaier; W Hitzl; M Nevitt; F Eckstein Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: D J Hunter; R Buck; E Vignon; F Eckstein; K Brandt; S A Mazzuca; B T Wyman; I Otterness; M P Hellio Le Graverand Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2009-04-17 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: F Eckstein; M Schnier; M Haubner; J Priebsch; C Glaser; K H Englmeier; M Reiser Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: James Huddleston; Amer Alaiti; Dov Goldvasser; Donna Scarborough; Andrew Freiberg; Harry Rubash; Henrik Malchau; William Harris; David Krebs Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2006-09-13 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: K Bloecker; W Wirth; A Guermazi; D J Hunter; H Resch; J Hochreiter; F Eckstein Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; David J Hunter; Erik B Dam; Bashir Zikria; C Kent Kwoh; Shadpour Demehri Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Piotr Luczkiewicz; Karol Daszkiewicz; Wojciech Witkowski; Jacek Chróścielewski; Tomasz Ferenc; Boguslaw Baczkowski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ming Zhang; Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Lyn Price; Daniel Harper; Grace H Lo; Eric Miller; Robert J Ward; Timothy E McAlindon Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Piotr Łuczkiewicz; Karol Daszkiewicz; Jacek Chróścielewski; Wojciech Witkowski; Pawel J Winklewski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240