Literature DB >> 21145747

The effect of prosthetic ankle energy storage and return properties on muscle activity in below-knee amputee walking.

Jessica D Ventura1, Glenn K Klute, Richard R Neptune.   

Abstract

In an effort to improve amputee gait, energy storage and return (ESAR) prosthetic feet have been developed to provide enhanced function by storing and returning mechanical energy through elastic structures. However, the effect of ESAR feet on muscle activity in amputee walking is not well understood. Previous studies have analyzed commercial prosthetic feet with a wide range of material properties and geometries, making it difficult to associate specific ESAR properties with changes in muscle activity. In contrast, prosthetic ankles offer a systematic way to manipulate ESAR properties while keeping the prosthetic heel and keel geometry intact. In the present study, ESAR ankles were added to a Seattle Lightfoot2 to carefully control the energy storage and return by altering the ankle stiffness and orientation in order to identify its effect on lower extremity muscle activity during below-knee amputee walking. A total of five foot conditions were analyzed: solid ankle (SA), stiff forward-facing ankle (FA), compliant FA, stiff reverse-facing ankle (RA) and compliant RA. The ESAR ankles decreased the activity of muscles that contribute to body forward propulsion and increased the activity of muscles that provide body support. The compliant ankles generally caused a greater change in muscle activity than the stiff ankles, but without a corresponding increase in energy return. Ankle orientation also had an effect, with RA generally causing a lower change in muscle activity than FA. These results highlight the influence of ESAR stiffness on muscle activity and the importance of prescribing appropriate prosthetic foot stiffness to improve rehabilitation outcomes.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21145747     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  9 in total

1.  Optimization of prosthetic foot stiffness to reduce metabolic cost and intact knee loading during below-knee amputee walking: a theoretical study.

Authors:  Nicholas P Fey; Glenn K Klute; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Considering passive mechanical properties and patient user motor performance in lower limb prosthesis design optimization to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2017-07-17

3.  Deleterious Musculoskeletal Conditions Secondary to Lower Limb Loss: Considerations for Prosthesis-Related Factors.

Authors:  Ashley D Knight; Christopher L Dearth; Brad D Hendershot
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Free-Living User Perspectives on Musculoskeletal Pain and Patient-Reported Mobility With Passive and Powered Prosthetic Ankle-Foot Components: A Pragmatic, Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Andreas Kannenberg; Arri R Morris; Karl D Hibler
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-01-14

5.  Focusing research efforts on the unique needs of women prosthesis users.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Andrew H Hansen; Elizabeth Russell Esposito
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2021-01-08

6.  Muscle activation patterns during walking from transtibial amputees recorded within the residual limb-prosthetic interface.

Authors:  Stephanie Huang; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Prosthetic energy return during walking increases after 3 weeks of adaptation to a new device.

Authors:  Samuel F Ray; Shane R Wurdeman; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Han Houdijk; Daphne Wezenberg; Laura Hak; Andrea Giovanni Cutti
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Knee joint biomechanics in transtibial amputees in gait, cycling, and elliptical training.

Authors:  Greg Orekhov; A Matt Robinson; Scott J Hazelwood; Stephen M Klisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.