Literature DB >> 21144775

Effect of humeral component version on impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Daniel R Stephenson1, Joo Han Oh, Michelle H McGarry, George F Rick Hatch, Thay Q Lee.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is growing in popularity for patients with deficient rotator cuffs; however, the phenomenon of scapular notching continues to be a concern. This study examined the effects of humeral component version in the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis (Tornier, Edina, MN) on impingement of the humeral prosthesis against the scapula to test the hypothesis that the mechanical contact of the humeral component with the scapular neck is influenced by the version of the humeral component.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven shoulders from deceased donors were tested after the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder was implanted. The deltoid, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi were loaded based on physiologic cross-sectional area. The degree of internal and external rotation when impingement, subluxation, or dislocation occurred was measured at 0°, 30°, and 60° glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Testing was performed with the humeral component placed in 20° of anteversion, neutral version, 20° of retroversion, and 40° of retroversion.
RESULTS: Maximum external rotation at 0° abduction was -1° ± 4° at 20° anteversion, 15° ± 3° at neutral, 28° ± 4° at 20° retroversion, and 44° ± 5° at 40° retroversion (P < .05). Maximum internal rotation at 0° abduction was 128° ± 9° at 20° anteversion, 112° ± 9° at neutral, 99° ± 8° at 20° retroversion, and 83° ± 8° at 40° retroversion (P < .05). Maximum external rotation at 30° abduction was 70° ± 6° at 20° anteversion, 84° ± 7° at neutral, 97° ± 6° at 20° retroversion, and 110° ± 5° at 40° retroversion (P < .05). There was no limitation to internal rotation at 30° abduction. No impingement occurred at 60° abduction. DISCUSSION: Version of the humeral component plays a role in range of motion and impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Anteversion can significantly decrease the amount of external rotation achievable after reverse total shoulder surgery.
CONCLUSION: Placing the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder humeral component at between 20° and 40° of retroversion more closely restores a functional arc of motion without impingement. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21144775     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  29 in total

1.  Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Alexandre Terrier; Julien Ston; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Kevin Chan; G Daniel G Langohr; Matthew Mahaffy; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: research models.

Authors:  Stefano Petrillo; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Alessandra Berton; Andreas Kontaxis; Timothy Wright; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty without subscapularis repair for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  F A Grassi; I Zorzolo
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

6.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  [Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy].

Authors:  T Patzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

9.  Pre-operative factors influence the recovery of range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Collin; Tetsuya Matsukawa; Patrick J Denard; Solenn Gain; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  [Indication for primary fracture prosthesis of the shoulder].

Authors:  C Kirchhoff; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.